If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Over on Planet Merrill, a newbie from rural Alaska calling himself Sealhunter 31 (he gives his real name in his first post) talks about how, among other things, he wants to avoid registering the birth of his new son (poor baby....). He gives a link to a site known as http://www.stormthunder.com; and if our old friend David Merrill isn't writing for this site under a pseudonym/sockpuppet, he is of one mind with the creator of the site, who among other things repeats David's fantasy about how demanding lawful money transubstantiates FRNs into USNs.
My favorite parts, though, are these:
"It is no accident that the United States is without a dollar unit coin. In recent years the Eisenhower dollar coin received widespread acceptance, but the Treasury minted them in limited number which encouraged hoarding. This same fate befell the Kennedy half-dollars, which circulated as silver sandwiched clads between 1965 and 1969, and were hoarded for their intrinsic value and not spent. Next came the Susan B. Anthony dollar, an awkward coin which was instantly rejected as planned."
"The remaining unit is the privately issued Federal Reserve note unit dollar with no viable competitors. Back in 1935 the Fed had persuaded the Treasury to discontinue minting silver dollars because the public preferred them over dollar bills. That the public money system has become awkward, discouraging its use, is no accident. It was planned that way."
This is almost too easy. The Ike dollar, despite high mintages, failed to achieve wide circulation for the same reason as the old silver dollars -- they were too big and clunky to use in everyday commerce, and except in the West tended to stay in bank vaults (which is why so many survive today in high grades). If they were hoarded, it was because of a phenomenon which I've seen over the last 50 years: if an American sees an unusual coin, he or she thinks "I have not seen this coin before. Therefore, it is rare. therefore, it will be 'worth money' someday. Therefore, I should save as many of them as I can get." My local coin dealer has lost track of how many times people have come into his store, bearing rolls or bags of Ike dollars, Bicentennial coins, 50-state quarters and the like, expecting to leave the store with a fat check. They are shocked when, because of the hassle in handling these, he won't even offer them face value in exchange.These days, I regularly see high-grade 50-state quarters and even Bicentennial quarters in change, spent by the would-be rich. We also had silver certificates circulating alongside the FRNs for many years; and between 1933 (at the latest) and 1963, the only $1 bills in circulations were SCs. I didn't see my first $1 FRN until the fall of 1963.
The Susan B. Anthony dollar was doomed when, due to lobbying from the vending machine industry, the proposed 11-sided design was scrapped and replaced by a round design, making the coin almost impossible to distinguish from a quarter solely by touch. The new "golden dollars" have plain or lettered edges which were meant to eliminate this problem; but people confuse them with quarters that have worn reeding on their edges.
The second paragraph is even more laughable. As I pointed our earlier, actual silver dollars were not popular, outside the West, except as birthday or other presents Mintage was ceased for no other reason besides the real one -- namely, that the Mint had run out of silver with which to mint them. Yes, they had plenty of silver on hand; but they couldn't mint silver dollars without the consent of Congress (Article I, Section 8, y'know). That's why there are no silver dollars with dates from 1905-1920 and 1929-1933; and that's also why the 1964-D silver dollars never made it into production after trial strikes were made.
Then, there is this:
"The Fed maintain a ready supply of United States notes in hundred dollar denominations for redemption purposes should it be required, and coins are available to satisfy claims for smaller amounts."
Um... no. There used to be $100 USNs in various vaults, which were "circulated" by moving the pallets of wrapped notes from Point A to Point B in the warehouse; but as this link shows, the $100 USNs were destroyed some 20 years ago:
http://www.moneyfactory.gov/historicallegislation.html
As for the coins: yes, if you want to "redeem" your FRN, you can go to the bank and request coins in exchange; but good luck getting silver coins from the teller.
It's so sad to see someone, especially one who has an innocent newborn baby in his house, take the first sips of Merrillian kool-aid....
My favorite parts, though, are these:
"It is no accident that the United States is without a dollar unit coin. In recent years the Eisenhower dollar coin received widespread acceptance, but the Treasury minted them in limited number which encouraged hoarding. This same fate befell the Kennedy half-dollars, which circulated as silver sandwiched clads between 1965 and 1969, and were hoarded for their intrinsic value and not spent. Next came the Susan B. Anthony dollar, an awkward coin which was instantly rejected as planned."
"The remaining unit is the privately issued Federal Reserve note unit dollar with no viable competitors. Back in 1935 the Fed had persuaded the Treasury to discontinue minting silver dollars because the public preferred them over dollar bills. That the public money system has become awkward, discouraging its use, is no accident. It was planned that way."
This is almost too easy. The Ike dollar, despite high mintages, failed to achieve wide circulation for the same reason as the old silver dollars -- they were too big and clunky to use in everyday commerce, and except in the West tended to stay in bank vaults (which is why so many survive today in high grades). If they were hoarded, it was because of a phenomenon which I've seen over the last 50 years: if an American sees an unusual coin, he or she thinks "I have not seen this coin before. Therefore, it is rare. therefore, it will be 'worth money' someday. Therefore, I should save as many of them as I can get." My local coin dealer has lost track of how many times people have come into his store, bearing rolls or bags of Ike dollars, Bicentennial coins, 50-state quarters and the like, expecting to leave the store with a fat check. They are shocked when, because of the hassle in handling these, he won't even offer them face value in exchange.These days, I regularly see high-grade 50-state quarters and even Bicentennial quarters in change, spent by the would-be rich. We also had silver certificates circulating alongside the FRNs for many years; and between 1933 (at the latest) and 1963, the only $1 bills in circulations were SCs. I didn't see my first $1 FRN until the fall of 1963.
The Susan B. Anthony dollar was doomed when, due to lobbying from the vending machine industry, the proposed 11-sided design was scrapped and replaced by a round design, making the coin almost impossible to distinguish from a quarter solely by touch. The new "golden dollars" have plain or lettered edges which were meant to eliminate this problem; but people confuse them with quarters that have worn reeding on their edges.
The second paragraph is even more laughable. As I pointed our earlier, actual silver dollars were not popular, outside the West, except as birthday or other presents Mintage was ceased for no other reason besides the real one -- namely, that the Mint had run out of silver with which to mint them. Yes, they had plenty of silver on hand; but they couldn't mint silver dollars without the consent of Congress (Article I, Section 8, y'know). That's why there are no silver dollars with dates from 1905-1920 and 1929-1933; and that's also why the 1964-D silver dollars never made it into production after trial strikes were made.
Then, there is this:
"The Fed maintain a ready supply of United States notes in hundred dollar denominations for redemption purposes should it be required, and coins are available to satisfy claims for smaller amounts."
Um... no. There used to be $100 USNs in various vaults, which were "circulated" by moving the pallets of wrapped notes from Point A to Point B in the warehouse; but as this link shows, the $100 USNs were destroyed some 20 years ago:
http://www.moneyfactory.gov/historicallegislation.html
As for the coins: yes, if you want to "redeem" your FRN, you can go to the bank and request coins in exchange; but good luck getting silver coins from the teller.
It's so sad to see someone, especially one who has an innocent newborn baby in his house, take the first sips of Merrillian kool-aid....
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Fed Chairman of the Quatloosian Reserve
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:25 am
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Apparently the quoted page has not been updated in a few years.It is no accident that the United States is without a dollar unit coin. In recent years the Eisenhower dollar coin received widespread acceptance, but the Treasury minted them in limited number which encouraged hoarding ...
The "Ike dollar" had a brief run from about 1971 through 1978, so the reference to "recent years" is apparently from the 1970s.
In more recent decades there have indeed been $1 coins, even if not used much in everyday commerce. For example, from http://catalog.usmint.gov/coin-programs ... l-1-coins/
It is not clear to me to what degree these facts alter the premise(s) of the quoted site; but it is clear that there is little or no worth of the site that can be diminished (with the express exclusion of the site worthiness for grins and chuckles, of course) by the facts.The U.S. Mint launched the Presidential $1 Coin Program in 2007. The 10-year initiative includes one dollar coins featuring obverse designs honoring the Presidents in the order in which they served in office.
David Merrill is listed as the author of an article entitled Public Money vs. Private Credit on the site under a banner that says:
The following article explains the legalities in detail, along with the remedy. THIS IS NOT THEORY, THIS IS FACT. IGNORE THIS AND YOU DESERVE WHAT’S COMING:
More likely, accept that article as worth anything (but for amusement) and you do deserve what is coming.
“Where there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” — Plato
-
- Princeps Wooloosia
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
There is a dollar coin, it has been issued in recent years. Gold colored, a bit larger than a quarter, evidently done with different portraits in honor of the different states. I know this because these coins are used in the DC subway system magnetic card machines for change for large bills.
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
I think there has been a current dollar coin issued almost every year, and they all have the same failing, they resemble a quarter, and all of the ones I currently have, and I have a large dish full of them at this point, came to me in change as quarters. With the exception of the Post Office which got steamrolled in to setting their machines to return change in dollar coins, they are absolutely and utterly useless.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
The only way that we will get a functional dollar coin into regular use in this country will be to follow Canada's example: 1) stop printing dollar bills, which have such a short useful life, and 2) make the dollar coin in a way so that it can be distinguished, by touch, from other coins in one's pocket. The UK has the "round pound" and no 1 pound note; and the Euro zone has the 1 euro coin (and no 1 euro note).notorial dissent wrote:I think there has been a current dollar coin issued almost every year, and they all have the same failing, they resemble a quarter, and all of the ones I currently have, and I have a large dish full of them at this point, came to me in change as quarters. With the exception of the Post Office which got steamrolled in to setting their machines to return change in dollar coins, they are absolutely and utterly useless.
When in Canada, I have no trouble distinguishing loonies from quarters (or even the old half dollars which I get down here and bring up there to spend).
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 6:46 am
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
but how do i exchange them for lawful money? oh, Sanhedrin.
lol. im tired so thats my two shekel dig at sfbkadmvp.
ninj
lol. im tired so thats my two shekel dig at sfbkadmvp.
ninj
whoever said laughter is the best medicine never had gonorrhea....
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
You know that there are people who do not enumerate their child at birth, nor is a birth cert from the state needed.Pottapaug1938 wrote:Over on Planet Merrill, a newbie from rural Alaska calling himself Sealhunter 31 (he gives his real name in his first post) talks about how, among other things, he wants to avoid registering the birth of his new son (poor baby....). He gives a link to a site known as http://www.stormthunder.com; and if our old friend David Merrill isn't writing for this site under a pseudonym/sockpuppet, he is of one mind with the creator of the site, who among other things repeats David's fantasy about how demanding lawful money transubstantiates FRNs into USNs.
My favorite parts, though, are these:
"It is no accident that the United States is without a dollar unit coin. In recent years the Eisenhower dollar coin received widespread acceptance, but the Treasury minted them in limited number which encouraged hoarding. This same fate befell the Kennedy half-dollars, which circulated as silver sandwiched clads between 1965 and 1969, and were hoarded for their intrinsic value and not spent. Next came the Susan B. Anthony dollar, an awkward coin which was instantly rejected as planned."
"The remaining unit is the privately issued Federal Reserve note unit dollar with no viable competitors. Back in 1935 the Fed had persuaded the Treasury to discontinue minting silver dollars because the public preferred them over dollar bills. That the public money system has become awkward, discouraging its use, is no accident. It was planned that way."
This is almost too easy. The Ike dollar, despite high mintages, failed to achieve wide circulation for the same reason as the old silver dollars -- they were too big and clunky to use in everyday commerce, and except in the West tended to stay in bank vaults (which is why so many survive today in high grades). If they were hoarded, it was because of a phenomenon which I've seen over the last 50 years: if an American sees an unusual coin, he or she thinks "I have not seen this coin before. Therefore, it is rare. therefore, it will be 'worth money' someday. Therefore, I should save as many of them as I can get." My local coin dealer has lost track of how many times people have come into his store, bearing rolls or bags of Ike dollars, Bicentennial coins, 50-state quarters and the like, expecting to leave the store with a fat check. They are shocked when, because of the hassle in handling these, he won't even offer them face value in exchange.These days, I regularly see high-grade 50-state quarters and even Bicentennial quarters in change, spent by the would-be rich. We also had silver certificates circulating alongside the FRNs for many years; and between 1933 (at the latest) and 1963, the only $1 bills in circulations were SCs. I didn't see my first $1 FRN until the fall of 1963.
The Susan B. Anthony dollar was doomed when, due to lobbying from the vending machine industry, the proposed 11-sided design was scrapped and replaced by a round design, making the coin almost impossible to distinguish from a quarter solely by touch. The new "golden dollars" have plain or lettered edges which were meant to eliminate this problem; but people confuse them with quarters that have worn reeding on their edges.
The second paragraph is even more laughable. As I pointed our earlier, actual silver dollars were not popular, outside the West, except as birthday or other presents Mintage was ceased for no other reason besides the real one -- namely, that the Mint had run out of silver with which to mint them. Yes, they had plenty of silver on hand; but they couldn't mint silver dollars without the consent of Congress (Article I, Section 8, y'know). That's why there are no silver dollars with dates from 1905-1920 and 1929-1933; and that's also why the 1964-D silver dollars never made it into production after trial strikes were made.
Then, there is this:
"The Fed maintain a ready supply of United States notes in hundred dollar denominations for redemption purposes should it be required, and coins are available to satisfy claims for smaller amounts."
Um... no. There used to be $100 USNs in various vaults, which were "circulated" by moving the pallets of wrapped notes from Point A to Point B in the warehouse; but as this link shows, the $100 USNs were destroyed some 20 years ago:
http://www.moneyfactory.gov/historicallegislation.html
As for the coins: yes, if you want to "redeem" your FRN, you can go to the bank and request coins in exchange; but good luck getting silver coins from the teller.
It's so sad to see someone, especially one who has an innocent newborn baby in his house, take the first sips of Merrillian kool-aid....
A family bible with the day of birth is legal and is a hearsay exception.
-
- Scalawag
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Needed for what purpose? Legal for what purpose?Patriotdiscussions wrote:You know that there are people who do not enumerate their child at birth, nor is a birth cert from the state needed.
A family bible with the day of birth is legal and is a hearsay exception.
A family bible with the day of birth is legal evidence towards getting a delayed birth certificate, but by itself it's not even sufficient to let you register to vote in many states.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:32 pm
- Location: Somewhere South of Canada...
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
From the comments under one of the posts I think that David under a pseudonym wrote that site, I say this because David himself seems to be using the comments to push Savingsforsuckers every chance he gets..
As for PatriotDismay's comments:
You are so wrong, a family bible is not sufficient for legal purposes in the united states for proof of birth other than the aforementioned comment, a delayed BC, however when said child grows up and wants to go to school, drive, get a job, etc, they will need a government issued BC or they will be able to live on the street, and even then, it's iffy.
As for PatriotDismay's comments:
You are so wrong, a family bible is not sufficient for legal purposes in the united states for proof of birth other than the aforementioned comment, a delayed BC, however when said child grows up and wants to go to school, drive, get a job, etc, they will need a government issued BC or they will be able to live on the street, and even then, it's iffy.
-
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Personally, i love the gold dollar coins.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
-
- A Councilor of the Kabosh
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
- Location: Wherever my truck goes.
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Aww, look, more drive-by irrelevancy. First of all a certificate of birth is issued with every single child born in the United States and is provided, in temporary form, before you leave the hospital. As such it lists the date and time of birth, parents (father and mother), place of birth, height, weight, etc. of the child. A legal format birth certificate is available later and is necessary for just about everything you do in life that involves the government. Need it to get a drivers license, enlist in the military, get any type of government benefits, apply for Social Security, used for getting a passport, first apply for school, etc. So... both statements in the first sentence are wrong, go figure. Second statement has been previously debunked.Patriotdiscussions wrote: You know that there are people who do not enumerate their child at birth, nor is a birth cert from the state needed.
A family bible with the day of birth is legal and is a hearsay exception.
So what, exactly, does this have to do with DMVP's crappy theory?
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
-
- Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:13 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
REMEMBER: Cheap shots at David Merrill are neither permitted nor tolerated.
David can not (unless he assumes some alias) post here any longer and, thus, can not defend himself against any bad-mouthing.
So, play nice.
David can not (unless he assumes some alias) post here any longer and, thus, can not defend himself against any bad-mouthing.
So, play nice.
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders
-
- Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:13 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
As usual, PD totally overlooked or intentionally misunderstood the RELEVANT portion of the statement: 'Sealhunter31' intends to avoid any form of government-related documentation with respect to his son. That has absolutely NOTHING to do with PD's blather regarding exceptions to in-hospital generated documentation.Patriotdiscussions wrote:You know that there are people who do not enumerate their child at birth, nor is a birth cert from the state needed.Pottapaug1938 wrote:Over on Planet Merrill, a newbie from rural Alaska calling himself Sealhunter 31 (he gives his real name in his first post) talks about how, among other things, he wants to avoid registering the birth of his new son
...
A family bible with the day of birth is legal and is a hearsay exception.
It is true that annotated family bibles, and assorted other documents and testimony, have been adjudged to be valid and legal substitutes for a missing birth certificate. HOWEVER, such documentation is valid only in specifically-defined instances -- usually with respect to obtaining some other form of government document such as a drivers' license or a Social Security card.
As previous posters have clearly stated, as the child grows up, the annotated bible, BY ITSELF, won't be of any use other than as an interesting paperweight.
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders
-
- Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
- Location: Earth
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
He also quoted an entire ~800 word posting just to make a two-sentence comment about the *FIRST* sentence in the posting.AndyK wrote:As usual, PD totally overlooked or intentionally misunderstood the RELEVANT portion of the statement:
That's either stupid or rude (or both).
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Or lazy. It could be lazy.LPC wrote:That's either stupid or rude (or both).
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Pirate Purveyor of the Last Word
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 2:06 am
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
Troll. From start to finish. And he should be finished.
All the States incorporated daughter corporations for transaction of business in the 1960s or so. - Some voice in Van Pelt's head, circa 2006.
-
- A Councilor of the Kabosh
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
- Location: Wherever my truck goes.
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
It's funny, so many people we see on here rail against the All Mighty Birth Certificate when, in essence, all it does is to give you the ability to prove that you were born in a certain place and a certain way to receive the rights you are due as a citizen. In other countries people have marched for years and fought just for the right to be given a birth certificate and to be able to prove they are citizens and, in many places, are still denied the right to that little piece of paper. I'll quote a little piece out of the Wiki article:
You can't prove you're a citizen, you don't have any rights in many places.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_certificateBirth registration opens the door to rights to children and adults which many other human beings take for granted: to prove their age; to prove their nationality; to receive healthcare; to go to school; to take exams; to be adopted; to protection from under-age military service or conscription; to marry; open a bank account; to hold a driving licence; to obtain a passport; to inherit money or property; and to vote or stand for elected office.
You can't prove you're a citizen, you don't have any rights in many places.
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
If I remember correctly, the sovrun obsession with birth certificates includes, among other things, the fact that they have serial numbers (just like currency) and are often printed on banknote-style stock (just like currency); so they must be money -- just like currency.JamesVincent wrote:It's funny, so many people we see on here rail against the All Mighty Birth Certificate when, in essence, all it does is to give you the ability to prove that you were born in a certain place and a certain way to receive the rights you are due as a citizen. In other countries people have marched for years and fought just for the right to be given a birth certificate and to be able to prove they are citizens and, in many places, are still denied the right to that little piece of paper. I'll quote a little piece out of the Wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_certificateBirth registration opens the door to rights to children and adults which many other human beings take for granted: to prove their age; to prove their nationality; to receive healthcare; to go to school; to take exams; to be adopted; to protection from under-age military service or conscription; to marry; open a bank account; to hold a driving licence; to obtain a passport; to inherit money or property; and to vote or stand for elected office.
You can't prove you're a citizen, you don't have any rights in many places.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
And it is another swing and a miss for Sovrunidjitjibber. It is a legal requirement in all 50 states that a birth, like a death has to be reported, registered in other words, so the people doing that are not only stupid in the extreme, but are breaking the law, and ultimately gifting their children, and probably themselves, with a whole series of legal problems when they get older.Patriotdiscussions wrote: You know that there are people who do not enumerate their child at birth, nor is a birth cert from the state needed.
A family bible with the day of birth is legal and is a hearsay exception.
Recording anything in a family bible is pure hearsay and not acceptable in any court except in very limited cases with a lot of supporting evidence to go with it, making it largely useless.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- A Councilor of the Kabosh
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
- Location: Wherever my truck goes.
Re: If David didn't write this page, an acolyte did.
I remember seeing three different cases where a family Bible was able to be used as a legal proof of birth, even then it was only one of multiple documents required. You can use it to get a social security card, a passport, or to register to vote. The first two basically require you to use it to get a delayed birth certificate if memory serves and the last is up to the voter's registration board to decide on. The Bible by itself is not enough, it must be accompanied by other documentation like census records or other government surveys, something noting the birth like a local newspaper, and a certificate of no record from the hospital, IIRC. An affidavit from the delivering doctor or midwife would probably also suffice. The Bible is, by no means, a single source of birth information. Which is still moot in this country since, as been noted, every birth is required by law to be registered and a birth in a hospital is automatically registered, whether you want it or not. These exceptions are meant for people of age when the record keeping was not as good, hence, none.
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"