http://www.manxforums.com/forums/index. ... len/page-1
(His incoherent OP has subsequently been self-edited several times so it has become even more unintelligible, if that is possible.)
The thread has now extended to 115 pages. A couple of supporters continued to rant about… well, you know the drill… NAMES, birth bonds, corporations, banks, common law, non-participation in society, sheeple, legal fictions etc., etc.
The initial ramblings pointed to this:
https://kateofgaia.wordpress.com/2014/0 ... is-fallen/
where you will recognise the beautiful Kate of Gaia (aka Keith Thompson). Tameelf states that the USUAL SUSPECTS will try to debunk the information but it cannot be REBUTTED.
“Read it and weep”, he says.
The usual suspects (?) immediately take the p**s and derail his gibberish with a discussion about Boney M. But eventually it settles down:
Tameelf soon reveals that he is driving around with ‘TameElf’ as a number plate on his car, and explains his world-view:“I think it's best if we just take the safety labels off everything, and let Darwin sort Tameelf out”
“you cast your bait ans subconsiously caught two egos that seem to think that it was them you were reaching out to.sadly these now self confessed egos added nothing to this thread they who are members of the co-opt team prob financed by a goverment to plant seeds and steer the topic in the goverments favor i mean you woud have to be payed judgeing by the amount of time he has put into the global warming thread. hes placed here in a govermental role to WELL govern the ****** mental in this litter for all literal shitefest”
(Keith Thompson’s views on gamete intra-fallopian transfer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYopC0-GsDU)“to the ego that thinks he owns his house YOU DONT get your deeds out look see.are you not listed as tenent you created the moonie the bank manager bought your house you entered a mortgage a death bond.knowing or unknowing fraudulently when you are fully payed up the crown owns it and at any time can collect because you bought it fraudulently by useing a crown copy righted name that IS NOT YOURS **** go look dont be-lie-ve m/e. dig out your deed
please do not bait the legal person in here his absence says lots he can only agree with m/e
for he has been given a G.I.F.T. GAMMA INTERA FALOPIAN TRANSFER this means he was born outside the womb every lie-er gets it. when they cross the temple bar also he has been given permission to use his dead name HAVE YOU. your po-lie-tit-ions they all swear a blood oath to the crown to protect it at all costs.not you the people.”
Ah. That’s clear then.
He also makes a prophecy:
Could be. But then again…“the plates will stay i will not be arrested i im not paranoid if the truth is mad and you cant comprehend it could it be that you are mad and i am sane“
Rather like our old friend Rob ‘Moosehead’ Menard, Tameelf tells us that he is really quite intelligent:
The reference to ‘phonetion’ links again to Keith Thompson, and it explains some of Tameelf’s strange spelling.“these days i tend to be in skype chats with professers of phycoligy bill clintons x campain manager people who speak fluent phonetion iv been on a few internet radio shows and i intend to run my own radio show in the near future because i am not all one(alone)”
https://kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com/ ... f-gaia.pdf
https://kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com/ ... f-gaia.pdf
In early January 2015, a photograph of Tame’s car is posted on the forum. Tameelf continues to boast that he does not need to recognise the law and that the police can’t or won’t do anything about it.
He posts his beliefs on the constabulary’s FB page.
It’s a great surprise to everyone, of course, that days later Tame is pulled over by the police and arrested. He spends 24 hours in the cells. He is examined at the hospital. His car is impounded.
Tameelf, aka Paul Joseph Doyle, arrived at the Court House on 26th March 2015 to answer to 6 charges, accompanied by an entourage of perhaps 10 supporters. Outside the courtroom, he immediately exasperated the Court Usher by making declarations and “waving his birth certificate”. Security was alerted and some large gentlemen in uniform became quite attentive. Mr Doyle seemed a little hesitant to enter the court but perhaps the aforesaid large gentlemen were able to assist.“i knew on the 1 august what would in time happen do you think i am that thick i did not see this coming”
Mr Doyle is 60, and obviously of poor health. He refused to stand in the dock and kicked up a fuss with the usher and security. The chairman of the magistrates tried to calm things down by allowing the accused to stand in front of the dock. Mr Doyle appeared to have a prepared script of several pages and commenced to read from it. I wasn’t able to make much sense of it, to be honest. I was expecting ‘OPCA woo’ and, although there were some recognisable elements there – the birth certificate, names in capitals, something about a trust – I couldn’t follow it. Additionally his words were mostly drowned out by the magistrates and the court clerk shouting (and I may be paraphrasing here) “What the **** are you on about?”
As it was already intruding upon precious lunchtime, the magistrates adjourned the proceedings until the afternoon. Mr Doyle left the court declaring “Case dismissed!”
The accused did appear after lunch, however, with his supporters, and again refused to stand in the dock. The clerk asked him to confirm his name, which he refused, but when the accused was pressed, “Have you at any time been known as Paul Joseph Doyle?”, he admitted that he had been known by that name in “a previous life”. The clerk asked “Was this previous life during the period you have been alive?” – at which point the giggles were starting on the Magistrates Bench.
The accused started to explain again that crown copyright is a fraud, the court is a trust, the court has no jurisdiction, but, again, it was not a well-structured speech and just appeared to be rambling gibberish. The magistrates smiling good humour and leniency* disappeared very quickly when Mr Doyle started aggressively questioning the court officials eg “Who are you?”, “What oath have you taken?”
They put up with it for a few seconds and then…
“Contempt of Court. Take him down”.
(* the magistrates had already demonstrated extraordinary leniency that day in several prior cases where the defendant had pleaded guilty)
During Mr Doyle’s sojourn in the cells a duty solicitor was sent to speak to him. I don’t know what was said, but the duty solicitor didn’t stay. According to Mr Doyle:
(note: Jurby = prison)he was the duty ad in caught we spoke downstairs he gave me some great advice freely on condition i could also say something soon as he said his name i twigged i used his advice my way later on and thats not why i am not in jurby ...contempt is about 30 days i am told but i could be wrong ..then i warned him not to comment agree or gesture or argue to what i am about to say then told him something that visably turned him pale adding im here to seek remedy find that for me and ill stop ..........so please dont link me to freeman its a lerning platform that becomes crap when you find and understand the 2nd paragraph of BIF anything before and after is cult distraction again for those who are hard of hearing i am not on a freeman path
guilty i got to agree again m8 im sorry it was prob the first case of its kind in the uk now do you accept i am not a freeman did a light just go on??? you spelled/spelt unpassionate wrong the sencable magistrates heard words that became a race to the door wonder what words would make ppl run i never told them to fck off yet they did in fact i never swore all day and ppl who know me will find that very hard to belive...
A mental health practitioner also appeared, and I had a chat to her about the Freeman/Sovereign citizen world-view. It was new to her, as it was to the usher and the magistrates, but they all seemed to cope quite well in the circumstances. I don’t know whether the mental health practitioner visited Mr Doyle; she was there for another case in court that day.
At the end of the day’s business Mr Doyle was brought back from the cells. He had no option but to stand in the dock because that’s where the stairs led to. No supporters were present. He was accompanied by two security guards.
He said he did not consent to the procedure – to which the magistrates responded “We don’t need your consent”. When asked to confirm his name he demanded to be referred to as “unidentified” (amongst other incoherent things that I didn’t understand). The charges were read and Mr Doyle was asked whether he was guilty or not guilty. He refused to plead, saying “pleading is begging, I don’t beg”.
The court clerk had no option but to mark it down as ‘not guilty’ and the clerk and magistrates then consulted on a trial date and bail conditions.
Mr Doyle demanded that they let him have his car back. He was informed that it was a matter for the police, not the court. He then made claims of assault against the security guards and the court usher. He was ignored.
The magistrates declared a trial for Tuesday 2nd June at 10am, with a bail recognisance of £500. The accused reverted to claims of consent.
He was asked to sign the bail bond, but again refused, “I do not sin” (presumably sign=sin). He offered to provide his autograph, but because his autographs are rare he asked to be paid £25,000.
The bail bond was marked ‘refused to sign’ and Mr Doyle was sent on his way. He declined to accept any documents from the court in case his DNA was transferred to them.
There were no reporting restrictions.
As this was, to the best of my knowledge, the first time our Courts had experienced the freeman/sovcit issues, I thought that they dealt with it quite well. I would have enjoyed seeing a better effort from Mr Doyle – the magistrates were not severely tested – but perhaps court officials will now take the opportunity to read up on the OPCA movement in preparation for further appearances.
