Peter of England: A REal guru.

[rumpelstilzchen]

I have just spoken to my friend in the clearing house and she has advised me the entire industry is now aware of these cheques and that the issue would be dealt with "appropriately". She said the issue was being taken seriously and that other bodies were going to be involved.

I am pi**ing myself here. gremlin the resident retard on Icke's has read that comment and he believes it is positive news

From a comment:

I have just spoken to my friend in the clearing house and she has advised me the entire industry is now aware of these cheques and that the issue would be dealt with "appropriately". She said the issue was being taken seriously and that other bodies were going to be involved.

Makes waves. Rippling that positive energy!

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 441&page=8

Let's look at it from how the fuckwit gremlin probably reads it:

I have just spoken to my friend in the clearing house and she has advised me the entire industry is now aware of these cheques and that the issue would be dealt with "appropriately".

The entire industry recognises the validity of these cheques. They will be dealt with in accordance with the BoE Act

She said the issue was being taken seriously

The financial industry will treat these cheques with the same respect they treat all other cheques.

and that other bodies were going to be involved

All the financial institutions will advise all other bodies to accept these cheques.

[rumpelstilzchen]

It gets worse! jayen4 responds with:

I'm not sure whether that ''dealt with appropriately'' bit sounds ominous or not !

Er.....I would suggest you go away and think about that jayen4.
Gawd blimey...who are these thickos?

[notorial dissent]

And the cries of woe will start to be heard later in the week and deleted almost as quickly.

[rumpelstilzchen]

And the cries of woe will start to be heard later in the week and deleted almost as quickly.

jayen4 has provided the get-out:

It sounds good,but never forget just who you are dealing with (banksters,theives,fraudsters et al)! If they don't like what someone else is trying to do,to make it better for the general populace,then you can be damned sure that they'll bust a gut to put a stop to it !

IOW Peter was right but they had to put a stop to him. They were running scared.

[wanglepin]

IOW Peter was right but they had to put a stop to him. They were running scared.

Peter of England planted the " banks ganging up on me" seed some days ago. and thicky goofers will fall for it.

[wanglepin]

bertiebert is getting tadge annoyed at Quatloos!

by bertiebert » Tue May 05, 2015 10:54 am

if you have your WeRe account number, and have sent a promissary note to the WeRe bank, the funds will be there.. soon you will have access to see your balance etc

if you have filled the cheque in wrong, it may be returned unpaid...as any other presentation of a wrongly filled in cheque would be!

some are trying to make the case to discredit...when in reality they are defending the present corrupt theft system we already have !

This is where the nay sayers/ time waster get their dissruptive info from, then pass it off as fact..

"The current scams being promoted on GOODF include Simon “Spaniard” Goldberg’s Direct Debit clawback (as described in this excellent thread by new forumer littleFred) as well as promoting the eviction protest group “Response”. This has lead GOODF to be involved with just about every UK sovrun and to ingratiate themselves with every failed cause. They were there when Guy Taylor retook Bodenham, they were present when Paula Campbell lost at court. They wailed and gnashed their teeth at these failures of law and offered sympathy and promoted these pointless fights."

"Ceylon" the UK's top Goodfer nothing

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=10301

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... UjRjTTF98E

[notorial dissent]

Of course they will, they fell for his scam to begin with.

[PeanutGallery]

Awwwww Bertie's quoting me! Hiya Bertie!

But I am wondering why he's using that quote and trying to say it's not fact. I mean their is a thread on GOODF about the Direct Debit clawback and Ceylon did go up to Bodenham when Guy retook it, we saw the video, that and they did support Paula Campbell when she got evicted and went into full on mortgage fraud against the banks. GOODF also has a bit of it's forum set up to deal with Response and promoting resistance against eviction.

Now...remind me...is Guy back lording it over Bodenham or is he due in court for criminal charges relating to unlawfully squatting and what's happened to Paul Campbell? Haven't heard anything from her except that the fight was going on and then it went all silent. The direct debit clawbacks, well they are due to get interesting quickly, especially with the amount of fraud some members have been getting up to. You see the things I wrote about, they were facts. Response is still turning up at evictions, although they didn't deliver much joy in County Durham recently.

Of course you probably think I'm a paid government shill. I'm not. The government hasn't paid me a penny to post this stuff, I'm also not a Freemason or a member of any secret societies or the bar, I'm someone who was taught the importance of critical thinking and the scientific method, who understands basic legal principles and who thinks that the promises made on GOODF can cause people serious harm. If the methods on GOODF worked, you wouldn't need response, their isn't a cheat code to getting out of trouble financial or otherwise and if you follow a rainbow you won't find a pot of gold. My reasons for arguing against GOODF is I can see the harm it's doing to the desperate and those naive enough to fall into trying one of it's scams.

[rumpelstilzchen]

Of course they will, they fell for his scam to begin with.

It's kind of weird really, these people must believe that PoE is some kind of a wizard who possesses sooper dooper magical powers. They know that if they write out a promissory note and try and pay it in at a proper bank the bank will tell them to piss off. They know no one will attach any value to that note and it's worthless. They cannot do anything with it. They know that. Yet at the same time they believe if they send the promissory note to Peter he can cast a magic spell and transform it instantly into £150,000 worth of available spends.

[rumpelstilzchen]

Awwwww Bertie's quoting me! Hiya Bertie!

Message to Bertie.
Hiya, Bertie! Come on over here and talk to us. I would come over there and talk to you but, like some of the other members on here, the mods at GOOFs banned me. (Three times actually )
What do you say? Are you up for it?

[longdog]

Well 5pm has rolled around here in her majesty's most united of kingdoms and the high street banks will have reached close of business for another stressful day of moving ones and zeros about.

But from Poe there has been not so much as a squeak.

I wonder why...

[rumpelstilzchen]

I wonder why...

'Cos that effing mobile won't stop ringing!

[longdog]

Has anybody here tried ringing it?

[rumpelstilzchen]

Has anybody here tried ringing it?

Not me. Being of a delicate disposition I'm worried that he might shout at me in ALL CAPS!

[GaryBale]

He posted on his facebook page at 05:45am yesterday. Up early to catch a flight perhaps?

[wanglepin]

But from Poe there has been not so much as a squeak.

I wonder why...

I wonder if Emily Davies got her "supprise" from Bromley District Council concerning her cheque for £1,766.10p.

[longdog]

From GOOFy....

"I have not received any paperwork from we re yet so a bit blind , but could we not somewhere include a 4x equitable penalty for being a Defaultee.??"

So not only are they going to protest their victim's 'dishonour' of their worthless cheque they want to charge them four times the value of the cheque for the privilege.

You couldn't make this shit up could you?

[Normal Wisdom]

From GOOFy....

"I have not received any paperwork from we re yet so a bit blind , but could we not somewhere include a 4x equitable penalty for being a Defaultee.??"

So not only are they going to protest their victim's 'dishonour' of their worthless cheque they want to charge them four times the value of the cheque for the privilege.

You couldn't make this shit up could you?

Isn't it already 7x according to Neelu?

[mufc1959]

Coming soon to a TV near you:

Fraud Squad
Tuesday 12th May at 9:00pm on ITV4
Series 3, Episode 2: Crime documentary series. This programme follows detectives from the City of London and Metropolitan Police as they pursue a gang who have committed the biggest ever bank cheque fraud in Britain. Despite our love of credit cards and online banking, we still write two million cheques every day. Counterfeiting a bank cheque is as hard as counterfeiting cash. Cheques are designed with a series of robust security measures including inks invisible to the naked eye, unique magnetic strips and bespoke layered paper. One gang have mastered the art of producing near perfect counterfeits which are passing through the banking system undetected. This enables them to steal millions of pounds from the victims' accounts. The programme has exclusive access to the DCPCU, a specialist unit funded by the banks, and films them during surveillance operations and making arrests. It also includes interviews with some of the victims of this sophisticated crime.

Ah, the documentary's about "sophisticated" crime. Peter of England's more likely to appear on CrimeBotch where they show that wall of fugitives the police urgently need to speak to.

[wanglepin]

It appears our new member tilts is being totally ignored. No one seems to want to address the "the critique and questions posed" here.

by tilts » Mon May 04, 2015 11:58 pm
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=10218&p=188644#p188616
I have read on another forum that this forum has a reputation for stifling healthy debate. Is this fair criticism?
Would anyone who has signed up with were bank or who understands how it functions care to offer answers to the critique and questions posed in the link posted above?
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... Uhl9zTF98E

Early days I suppose for us that is, far too late for the suckers who fell for it. Not even the ardent promoter of the WeRe Bank and it's dodgy cheques Mark ceylon Haining or bertiebert who seem rather shy, want to tackle any questions .
I must say, those over there on GOODF do treat their ardent members with contempt and disdain at times , I feel.
I will pose a simple one for promoter of WeRe Bank Mark Haining (Ceylon) of GOODF.
Mark Haining Ceylon, have you paid off anything with your WeRe bank Cheques or did it/they bounce?