Biggest problem you have overlooked though is that a dog can't claim state benefits.vampireLOREN wrote:Slight problem you may have over looked , a dog can be euthanized on request to a vet. It could end badly especially for the dog.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Biggest problem you have overlooked though is that a dog can't claim state benefits.vampireLOREN wrote:Slight problem you may have over looked , a dog can be euthanized on request to a vet. It could end badly especially for the dog.
The owner of said dog, however, can be all of the above.longdog wrote:Thinking about it this could be the Next Big Thing™ in the freeman movement... Transfer all of your legally lawful legal liabilities to your dog.
A dog doesn't need a driving licence.
A dog cannot be sued.
A dog cannot be arrested.
A dog cannot be tried.
A dog cannot be jailed.
A dog doesn't have to pay taxes.
A dog's birth isn't registered.
It ticks all the right boxes.
On and for the record this is the copyright© 2015 idea of the copyright© 1965 entity commonly known as longdog all rights reserved, non-assumptit, not-negotiable, accepted for value, exempt levy, errors and omission accepted and so on and so forth and etcetera.
It was no skin off his nose.PeanutGallery wrote:My dog used to try to create Joinder with everything he saw, eventually we got him fixed.
jimmyw » Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:22 am
i'm getting my head around this now....
so you send someone a cheque, they try to cash it and the bank says its cleared.
they decide not to accept it, !?!?!?
they then come chasing you for money on a debt you have offered to pay..... how can that work for them?
they have to either accept payment or debt is GONE.
G O N E
Jimmyw mail handling and registering service.
by jimmyw » Wed May 06, 2015 8:34 am
I've just had an idea, that is so simple and easy I'm surprised it has not been done already......the best ideas are always the simple ones lol
How's the dog going to write out it's Last Will And Testament to leave everything to Jimmy?ArthurWankspittle wrote:Biggest problem you have overlooked though is that a dog can't claim state benefits.vampireLOREN wrote:Slight problem you may have over looked , a dog can be euthanized on request to a vet. It could end badly especially for the dog.
Government? That's a bit progressive isn't it? The answer is (IIRC) it goes to The Crown.Hyrion wrote:And what happens to an Estate if there is no LWAT? Does a good chunk of it revert to the Government?
I encouraged him so much....he banned me.wanglepin wrote:Jimmy one cell`s BIG IDEA !![]()
Jimmyw mail handling and registering service.
by jimmyw » Wed May 06, 2015 8:34 am
I've just had an idea, that is so simple and easy I'm surprised it has not been done already......the best ideas are always the simple ones lol
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... UocrDTF98E
I love it when those other goofers egg him on.
I choose the term as it's more "neutral" - in other words, covers more worldly jurisdictions.ArthurWankspittle wrote:Government? That's a bit progressive isn't it? The answer is (IIRC) it goes to The Crown.Hyrion wrote:And what happens to an Estate if there is no LWAT? Does a good chunk of it revert to the Government?
To enable another person to drive a car owned by a dog, the vehicle would require third party insurance in the name of the dog. The person would then be a named driver on the dogs policy or would need third party cover to enable him to drive another car. Now here comes the tricky bit when applying for insurance for the dog unless it is one hell of an intelligent critter one would have to act for it. Among the questions asked will be does the dog have a full licence? and date of birth here is where it goes tits up say the dog is 5years old !!! immediate warning bells will sound. This could lead to getting stopped by the police and having to say it is not the dogs car...... it belongs to your brother. Brothers I put it to you this concept is flawed.PeanutGallery wrote:Isn't the legal status of a dog such that it is property. If someone were to humanely destroy another persons pet dog, the worst they could be charged with would be criminal damage (which does sound upsetting, especially if you own a dog or like them).
Therefore if a dog is property, can it actually own property? Wouldn't any property ostensibly owned by the dog revert to the dogs owner, such that my dog has toys, but I own them and simply let the dog utilise them. So if Jimmy owns the dog and the dog owns the car, Jimmy owns the car.
Of course if nobody owns the dog, then the dog is a stray and should be taken in by an animal rescue centre and re-homed, in which case would it take it's car with it to the rescue centre? Would the car then belong to them?
Only in some cases, but it is a common clause.vampireLOREN wrote:To enable another person to drive a car owned by a dog, the vehicle would require third party insurance in the name of the dog.
Well there are the issues that it is unlikely to be over 17, won't have a driving license and will not have any driving experience. I'm more looking forward to the Police checking the driver has the owner's permission to drive the car.vampireLOREN wrote:Now here comes the tricky bit when applying for insurance for the dog...