I think that's the bit they are clinging on to. I suppose they think that if they can cast doubt on one figure, no matter how small and the judge acknowledges it, then it must follow the whole case collapses which means the Order for Possession is not valid. Then there can be no warrant. No warrant....suspension must be lifted because warrant does not exist.Normal Wisdom wrote:
You could be right. Obviously that was a relatively small amount representing the amount of interest that he actually owed in addition to the capital sum. Hardly an indicator of fraud but after today I wouldn't be surprised how they spin any information
Nutty I know, but these are nutty people.