UK - Tom Crawford Calls For Help

[wanglepin]

Over on goof
Re: The JUDGEMENT EXPLAINED!!!!!!!!!
Postby letissier14 » Fri May 22, 2015 11:07 pm

Embarrassing. Tom needs to get a solicitor asap

[rumpelstilzchen]

Wise words. That is if it is not too late.

[Bones]

My sympathy for Tom is starting to come back a little.

What has Mark and Guy done to him to further their own causes - just look at all the ceylon adverts. He looks more and more like a helpless puppet with them pulling his strings

As for letisser - respect to you, it may already be too late but do you have any way to contact Tom and try and talk some sense into him

[wanglepin]

I believe Taylor is worried Tom Crawford is not going to pay him for all his legal advice.
Ceylon is worried he won't be getting his finder's fee.
And Ebert trying to squeeze what may be left of Tom`s legal fund and is still explaining to Tom the difference between a sea lion masquerading as a seal .

[Bones]

He should pay them all with WeRe cheques

Got to see how Ceylon tries and pulls this one back, remember in the other video how excited he got about this video. I can't see what got him so excited.

He said that we were all going to be in for a shock and this is how he looked when he said it



Where is King's hand ????

around 9:20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP5PubNsbK8#t=581

[rumpelstilzchen]

The JUDGEMENT EXPLAINED!!!!!!!!!

The nine exclamation marks are swaying me towards their line of thinking.

[wanglepin]

Re: The JUDGEMENT EXPLAINED!!!!!!!!!
by Wooden head » Fri May 22, 2015 11:40 pm
That video shows both Tom and Guy Taylor to be liars.
Guy Taylor has a very short memory if he is going to insist that there was never any warrant issued. Which he is insisting..
Wooden head
Bronze Member


Posts: 53
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 10:53 am
•
http://getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewt ... 83#p387683

[wanglepin]

He should pay them all with WeRe cheques

Got to see how Ceylon tries and pulls this one back,

he should pay off all his debt with WeRe cheques seeing Haining has faith in them.
Well going by the comments so far, no one is impressed with it except Sycophant Salli who has post a smile. What she finds to smile about is beyond my understanding. The other platinum star mods are peed off with all the lies and back sliding.

[Bones]

Found part 2 AND 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1uwbPFeTD0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIhA47IZh7g

Edit - ignore that they are just parts of the video already posted

[JonnyL]

Go to their eviction fraud of the bank page, read the comments, then find a brick wall, put your hands behind your back, take a deep breath then repeatedly thrust your face into the brick wall.

It's stuuuuuuuuuuupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[#six]

Who where was the new information in that video? Where was the smoking gun? Where have the brain cells I just lost gone to? If I wanted to watch dumb and dumber I could have rented the film rather than watch that badly edited, badly researched, badly presented waste of bandwidth.

[NYGman]

Just an FYI, I'm YouTube on my pc, i can click sertings, and change the speed to double time. This makes viewing these videos a bit more tolerable.

[Bones]

I was sitting at home thinking about this and this just came to me

In the video posted by Ceylon - Tom talks (around 1:40) about what he says was £173 that he claims was allegedly paid into Sue's account. The payment relates to the cashing in of the endowment, which Tom claims he did not know about.

The judgement states

30. Bradford & Bingley have information from Phoenix Group (successors to Royal Life) indicating that their records show that endowment policy premium payments were received from the account of S A Crawford (Mrs Crawford) up to and including 25 June 1991. There is no record of any payments thereafter and the policy was surrendered on 22nd July 1992 with a surrender payment of £178.75. There is a credit to the Crawford’s mortgage account of £178.75 on 23rd July 1992.

Now here is the kicker, Tom denies this, yet if you watch this video made by tom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsJPDQKglpU
very carefully at 7:28 and look at the credit entries (money paid in) on the mortgage statements, that Tom is showing, you will notice something interesting



It is clearer if you watch the video but you can see a credit to the mortgage account for





You can make out in the above £17x.75 - I am guessing the x is an 8.

Tom's own statements, that Tom showed on youtube, show the money from the cashed in endowment policy being credited to the mortgage account. Tom has known about this since 1992.

[Hercule Parrot]

That pose reminded me of another self-satisfied, smirking rat -

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Rat)

The resemblance is quite uncanny....


And let's not forget the half-witted sidekick -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_and_Andy

[guilty]

On the subject of the latest video, William Marshal says on GOOFers:

TOM raised the claim of fraud in para 75 NOT the judge. The judge said in 76 that was not true, There is no "recognition" of fraud.
It doesn't matter what the arrears were. The possession order is based on the fact that there were arrears over two months. The judge explains this in para 92. His snarky comment about computer records is obiter dicta. It is NOT a "key point".
You don't understand what 'seal' means.
You don't understand what a warrant is.
You didn't raise these issues at the court case. It is too late now.
It was at the County Court. It doesn't matter which particular room it was in.
You don't understand 'claimant' and 'defendant'.
You don't understand court procedure.
'Review and revise' is a made up procedure by you.
Due process has happened. You were at court. The suggestion that there has never been a court case is insane. You have been there at least three times.
Talk of seals, affidavits and fees is just an attempt to confuse the viewer.
B&B didn't ask for costs because that would have resulted in an assessment which would not have covered their costs. In mortgage cases it is quite normal for the lender to do this because your mortgage agreement already says that you have to pay costs. The costs will be added to the amount you owe. It is nothing to do with tax. They didn't pass up a pay-day - they already have the authority to collect the charges, they didn't need the judge to order it.
B&B didn't turn up for the reading of the decision because they didn't need to. They already had a copy.
Guy Taylor is an idiot.

You didn't pay your mortgage. Why do you think you deserve a free house?
Tom, dump Guy Taylor and get yourself some proper advice.

[Hercule Parrot]

William Marshal will wake up with a horse's head in his bed for that outrageous, unwarranted bare-faced honesty.

[Jeffrey]

Wait so when does he get evicted.

[Normal Wisdom]

On the subject of the latest video, William Marshal says on GOOFers:

TOM raised the claim of fraud in para 75 NOT the judge. The judge said in 76 that was not true, There is no "recognition" of fraud.
It doesn't matter what the arrears were. The possession order is based on the fact that there were arrears over two months. The judge explains this in para 92. His snarky comment about computer records is obiter dicta. It is NOT a "key point".
You don't understand what 'seal' means.
You don't understand what a warrant is.
You didn't raise these issues at the court case. It is too late now.
It was at the County Court. It doesn't matter which particular room it was in.
You don't understand 'claimant' and 'defendant'.
You don't understand court procedure.
'Review and revise' is a made up procedure by you.
Due process has happened. You were at court. The suggestion that there has never been a court case is insane. You have been there at least three times.
Talk of seals, affidavits and fees is just an attempt to confuse the viewer.
B&B didn't ask for costs because that would have resulted in an assessment which would not have covered their costs. In mortgage cases it is quite normal for the lender to do this because your mortgage agreement already says that you have to pay costs. The costs will be added to the amount you owe. It is nothing to do with tax. They didn't pass up a pay-day - they already have the authority to collect the charges, they didn't need the judge to order it.
B&B didn't turn up for the reading of the decision because they didn't need to. They already had a copy.
Guy Taylor is an idiot.

You didn't pay your mortgage. Why do you think you deserve a free house?
Tom, dump Guy Taylor and get yourself some proper advice.

That would seem to cover it. I like this William Marshall fella.

I think the GOODF crew ought to bear in mind the old adage "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"

[vampireLOREN]

On the subject of the latest video, William Marshal says on GOOFers:

TOM raised the claim of fraud in para 75 NOT the judge. The judge said in 76 that was not true, There is no "recognition" of fraud.
It doesn't matter what the arrears were. The possession order is based on the fact that there were arrears over two months. The judge explains this in para 92. His snarky comment about computer records is obiter dicta. It is NOT a "key point".
You don't understand what 'seal' means.
You don't understand what a warrant is.
You didn't raise these issues at the court case. It is too late now.
It was at the County Court. It doesn't matter which particular room it was in.
You don't understand 'claimant' and 'defendant'.
You don't understand court procedure.
'Review and revise' is a made up procedure by you.
Due process has happened. You were at court. The suggestion that there has never been a court case is insane. You have been there at least three times.
Talk of seals, affidavits and fees is just an attempt to confuse the viewer.
B&B didn't ask for costs because that would have resulted in an assessment which would not have covered their costs. In mortgage cases it is quite normal for the lender to do this because your mortgage agreement already says that you have to pay costs. The costs will be added to the amount you owe. It is nothing to do with tax. They didn't pass up a pay-day - they already have the authority to collect the charges, they didn't need the judge to order it.
B&B didn't turn up for the reading of the decision because they didn't need to. They already had a copy.
Guy Taylor is an idiot.

You didn't pay your mortgage. Why do you think you deserve a free house?
Tom, dump Guy Taylor and get yourself some proper advice.

That would seem to cover it. I like this William Marshall fella.

I think the GOODF crew ought to bear in mind the old adage "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"

Me too, he covered the whole sorry mess. William if you see this Well Done.

[wanglepin]

You can make out in the above £17x.75 - I am guessing the x is an 8.

Tom's own statements, that Tom showed on youtube, show the money from the cashed in endowment policy being credited to the mortgage account. Tom has known about this since 1992.

It just gets worse doesn't it. Tom needs a good friend like errrm Guy Taylor who will tell him that X = is not 8 but 10. That will put all the accusations of lies and deceit to rest once and for all.