Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Probably just detained for a while on BoP and then de-arrested. He's posting now on GOODF, but he doesn't have much to say. A distinct lack of VICTORY!!1!!1 rhetoric.YiamCross wrote:Hearing that Mark Ceyon has been arrested. Woo Hoo if true.
How undignified. Unfortunately, I doubt this will be the end of this whole sorry saga. The man is a stubborn old bastard.
I suspect you are right but I was hoping he would be arrested for assaulting a police officer. That would just be the cherry on the cake for his next tenancy application: No money except a state pension. 26+ years mortgage arrears. Rent-a-mob morons ready to turn out to defend him and a criminal conviction.YiamCross wrote:It's not that funny when you listen to what these people are saying. The WPC who put her hand out to stop Tom getting through the cordon has assaulted him and "deserves a smack in the mouth".The idiots seem to think this is why he's been arrested.
They don't realise Tom was arrested because he refused to leaved the scene when asked to do so by a properly authorised police officer. I expect they just wanted to get him out of the way for a while, more for his own safety, I wouldn't be surprised if he was released without charge.
That's it Fred, spoil a good day.littleFred wrote:
I don't know what Ceylon did to get nicked. Quite likely no-one will be charged with any offences.
>>>Ah, so Tom was driving the car at speed towards the police lines. See the video https://www.facebook.com/pete.maddock.7 ... =2&theater at 2m 0s onwards.dobble wrote:I don't have much to add to the discussion other than to note that Tom's first action on site seems to have been to attempt to arrest the incident commander - see https://www.facebook.com/10000917550408 ... cation=ufi from 4:30 onwards. Doesn't seem like a particularly wise move...
In isolation, that would be fair enough. "We should have sympathy for Tom, and not discuss why this has happened."SalliNae wrote:In an ideal world, we would all be gathered together and seeking a solution whilst always having consideration for Tom's choice of path and supporting him regardless. Especially now.
Can we not, at the very least, accept that we all have opinions (just like arseholes) and they don't mean a thing because it is not our house. It is not our family. It is Tom's. All we can do is support his path. Like he would support yours, in a heartbeat.
This is not about right or wrong. ...
SalliNae is allowed to whip up opinion that Tom was standing up to corruption. She will not tolerate the opinion that the story is far simpler: Tom didn't pay off his mortgage so never bought his house.SalliNae wrote:[...] who chose his path to expose an incredibly corrupt system to benefit many. [...] a gentleman with a loving family who has done nothing to hurt any one of you. [...] This is about standing up to corruption. Knowing that if we do not tackle it now, we leave a legacy to our children and grandchildren that they do not deserve. [...] those filthy rotten costume wearers will be having a very good laugh at our expense if we do not look at the bigger picture and start working together.
Sound like that was his second action with the first being attempting to intimidate the police with his car.dobble wrote:I don't have much to add to the discussion other than to note that Tom's first action on site seems to have been to attempt to arrest the incident commander - see https://www.facebook.com/10000917550408 ... cation=ufi from 4:30 onwards.Doesn't seem like a particularly wise move...
The guy must have been stressed out of his mind. He's miles from home when the news reaches him, and he frantically rushes back. Interesting that he was alone. None of the people who were in London with him came back, no family or supporters met him at the station. He seemed isolated and overwhelmed by the fact that it was really happening. I admit to feeling some sympathy for him - he really thought he was going to get away with this, and now it's all in ashes.Jeffrey wrote:The car stunt alone justifies putting him in jail a while to cool off.
>>>If his path were be to murder me and my family, I think any sane person would understand why I wouldn't want to support his path. Sorry SalliNae - I don't blindly back anyone - not even my own family.SalliNae wrote:In an ideal world, we would all be gathered together and seeking a solution whilst always having consideration for Tom's choice of path and supporting him regardless.
[snip]
All we can do is support his path. Like he would support yours, in a heartbeat.
Ahh - and here's where the truth really comes out.SalliNae wrote:This is not about right or wrong. ...
The only time I've ever heard anyone throw that in as an argument was when they wanted to do something they knew was wrong. That's like every time someone has ever told me:not about right or wrong
I learned that's a sure sign you definitely need to have a Lawyer involved for your own protection. Although in my case, my option is simply not to proceed in doing business with that person in the first place - it's a far simpler solution that's also far less costly.We don't have to involve Lawyers
Joanne Ince: Spoke with Craig Crawford earlier (about 15 mins ago) his mum is safe with the dog. Xxxx
Joanne Ince: We nipped up to see if there was anything else we could do and we asked craig and he said they were both safe. The poor dog is still very ill but is safe with sue bless xxxx
also fount this video which might have already been posted.Police said a 64-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police officer and a breach of the peace.
Two people were arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police officer, another for a breach of the peace and a fourth for a racially aggravated public order offence.
All remained in custody last night.