If they did, no doubt they would lie about it and claim victoryFatGambit wrote:If the family have the money as they claim, is there anything to stop one of them bidding at the auction to buy the house for Tom?
![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
If they did, no doubt they would lie about it and claim victoryFatGambit wrote:If the family have the money as they claim, is there anything to stop one of them bidding at the auction to buy the house for Tom?
No. It would be an auction that the public can attend. However, if their bid was succesful they would have to actually pay the amount of their bid plus auction fees. There would be no chance of them getting the house without parting up. The house will make more than Tom owed so it would be a false economy.FatGambit wrote:If the family have the money as they claim, is there anything to stop one of them bidding at the auction to buy the house for Tom?
I am not too sure about that rumple. it depends on how you want to read this;rumpelstilzchen wrote:I think it is now safe to say that any suspicions we may have had that Tom has secretly negotiated with B&B to repay the loan were without foundation.
http://www.nottinghampost.com/Tom-Crawf ... story.htmlUK Asset Resolution Limited released a statement on behalf of Bradford and Bingley.
It read: "Repossession is always viewed as a last resort and follows a series of forbearance options, with the aim of finding a solution that takes account of the customer's specific circumstances.
"Regrettably, in this instance, we have been unable to find a solution.
#six wrote:Tom "supporters" really are showing their true colours now. Abusing and harassing the owner of the removals firmhttps://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=6052144 ... =1&theater
Funny that, Tom's dog had died then wasn't dead at all but very sick but he didn't think to have his beloved pet put out of it's misery.You area sorry excuse for a human being and should be put down like a sick dog.
Which is what Tom's dog seem to be suffering from at this moment.I hope you did a slow and painful death
There was a post by a member on BTBAB facebok page yesterday suggesting that they start a fund up so that they can buy Toms house at auction and then hand it back to Tom.FatGambit wrote:If the family have the money as they claim, is there anything to stop one of them bidding at the auction to buy the house for Tom?
I think they would have to pay the deposit plus related fees on a successful bid. You have to be sat there with a Bank Draft ready to fill in the amount on. The auctioneer will check you out before letting you bid to make sure you aren't messing them about. Fall of hammer is effectively exchange of contract with (99.9% of the time) 4 weeks to complete. For the Crawfords to pull this off they need the best part of £100k, say £15k-20k at the auction and the rest within 28 days. Not going to happen.rumpelstilzchen wrote:No. It would be an auction that the public can attend. However, if their bid was succesful they would have to actually pay the amount of their bid plus auction fees. There would be no chance of them getting the house without parting up. The house will make more than Tom owed so it would be a false economy.FatGambit wrote:If the family have the money as they claim, is there anything to stop one of them bidding at the auction to buy the house for Tom?
Tom Crawford charged with assaulting police officer
After an all-day stand off with police, Tom Crawford has been charged with assaulting an officer following the repossession of his home.
The 64-year-old, now of no fixed address, was arrested on Thursday after bailiffs arrived at his Carlton home.
He was one of around 50 protestors involved in the demonstration.
In total, two people have been charged with offences after five people were arrested
Monika Godos, 34, of Woodthorpe, Nottingham, has also been charged with assaulting a police constable.
The pair will appear at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court on July 31.
A 43-year-old man arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police constable in the execution of their duty has been bailed pending further enquiries until July 20.
A 21-year-old man from Nottingham received a fixed penalty for obstruction of a highway.
A 43-year-old man arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence remains in police custody
Ouch!The 64-year-old, now of no fixed address
I can't say I'm not surprised. But he'll always have a way out. Once convicted he will claim it was a great success and the judge found him not guilty because in legalese, guilty means the exact oppositeguilty wrote:http://www.nottinghampost.com/Tom-Crawf ... story.htmlTom Crawford charged with assaulting police officer
After an all-day stand off with police, Tom Crawford has been charged with assaulting an officer following the repossession of his home.
The 64-year-old, now of no fixed address, was arrested on Thursday after bailiffs arrived at his Carlton home.
He was one of around 50 protestors involved in the demonstration.
In total, two people have been charged with offences after five people were arrested
Monika Godos, 34, of Woodthorpe, Nottingham, has also been charged with assaulting a police constable.
The pair will appear at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court on July 31.
A 43-year-old man arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police constable in the execution of their duty has been bailed pending further enquiries until July 20.
A 21-year-old man from Nottingham received a fixed penalty for obstruction of a highway.
A 43-year-old man arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence remains in police custody
I thought I read somewhere that they had been denied access to the court. Problem is that I read so much in the last 24 hours I can't remember where I saw it.wanglepin wrote:I see that Tom and Guy Taylor had been in court earlier helping some one else lose there house.
At the end of the day we have every bank docket to prove that we paid over 130k ish on a 41k mortgage.
At least when pressed, Craig admits he doesn't understand the mortgage system but is relying on pure blind faith that his father wouldn't do something so stupid as to not pay his mortgage. Amanda it seems is not so self aware and continues to churn out opinions based on her partial understanding of the misleading and contradictory rubbish that Tom and co have been producing for months if not years. Tom's arguments are difficult to follow at the best of times and hers are worse since they seems to be based on her listening at the keyhole while Tom, Guy and Ebert discuss strategy. Fortunately we have the judgement and some helpful videos from Tom which tells us all we need to know. Perhaps Amanda should consult them before advancing any more "Chinese whispers" masquerading as ideas.YiamCross wrote:Amanda P's post is back again. Is it fair to inflict it on you? Hell, why should I suffer alone? the crux crooks of the matter is, well, see for yourselves.
Not actually been to sleep so excuse the state of this but
we dont actually know whats gone on, why they did it or why they refused us any paper work to see which in itself is against the law. What i witness yesterday was terrorism. Pure and simple. My nan not yet in her grave our family pet with maybe only hours to live now. We were threatened, attacked, assulted, insulted, laughed by "bailiffs" court staff, "security staff" and most shocking of all the police, all day long even while i was sobbing told we were boring by a police man, god the list is endless. But the crooks of the matter are. We read out to them verbatim the actual laws being broken. Which ive lost count of. They'd cover many pages, the people there to protect us and be impartial, were totally ONLY on the side, with the bank...however. with all this said its only the beginning. Now its a criminal matter, we have plans. Things will get going again. At the end of the day we have every bank docket to prove that we paid over 130k ish on a 41k mortgage. Along with all our other evidence If that in itself apart from the rest of the matter isn't enough evidence for you i don't know what it. It was proven in court we did not change the mortgage it was proven the judge could NOT find the figure the bank were claiming we owed, it was also proven that we did not agree for it to be changed, and that the bank did not change it back to its original agreement 2 parties HAVE to agree to change a contract thatvis FACT and was agreed upon in court . However this is all a side matter though, as NO PROCESS was followed. Litrally none. Grater issues and laws have been broken. So once we get it further they are going to have to prove what they are saying. Considering they brought zero evidence to the previous hearing well that will be very interesting wont it. They can't and they know it. Anyway lifes a fucking ball bag of a bitch sometimes i feel so so sorry for my mum , dad, sister and brother but you know what I couldnt be bloody prouder. One day all will see. The criminals may have won yesterday but not for long. THANKYOU SO SO MUCH for the messages of support you'll never EVER understand what it means to us. Love you all and THANKYOU for sticking with us xx
'I'm not sure of the geography around the house but in the video where he's arrested he's walking away from the property down the road talking on the phone while one copper is trying to read him the despersal notice, another copper stops him and starts pushing him back up the hill towards his house (iirc Ferne Close is at the top of hill), at this point more coppers pile in and start man handing him, then he lashes out at one and is arrested, that's how I understood what I was watching anyway.Losleones wrote:Tom looked remarkably cool & unfazed in the video which makes one ponder how he managed to get arrested. As for taking advise from the likes of Ceylon (2 failed business ventures) & ex convict Guy Taylor beggars belief.
I particularly enjoyed our John's narration throughout the video. "Disgraceful". Reminded me of Haining in an earlier eviction video where he repeatedly threatened to arrest a Police Officer.