Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Having been a resident of Nottingham for many years and having called the police to a proper fight (knives and bats rather than drunken idiots...) it was the X5s they sent. They sure as hell didn't mess around when they turned up either!Hercule Parrot wrote: There were several 'interesting' unmarked vehicles around, especially the dark unmarked 4x4's. Not the sort of thing that's used for ordinary Police work, and likely to be ARV.
"Cancer survivor"? Nah, let us go the whole hog and describe him as a "cancer sufferer". It has more of an effect don't you think?arayder wrote:
Tom added the "cancer survivor" spin on to his original story in order to heighten his victimhood.
What about the poor sick dog? No one remembers the dog. Or the chicken. Remember the Ferne Close 6!ArthurWankspittle wrote:Gregg wrote:I'm a prostate cancer survivor, ..... you say Cancer survivor!!!!! Repossession!!!1!!! Fraud!!21!!! Major Surgery!!3£!!
I should flippin' hope so, it's what they're paid for. The chances of an ARV producing weapons for that motley crew are slim and none, I imagine they were just unmarked cars that were in the area. Same with tasers, there's as much chance of a copper risking being photographed waving his taser about inappropriately as there is of him having his todger dangling in the breeze. Less, probably.Hercule Parrot wrote:There were several 'interesting' unmarked vehicles around, especially the dark unmarked 4x4's. Not the sort of thing that's used for ordinary Police work, and likely to be ARV.Colin123 wrote:Now as i have noticed that these great unwashed have their phones super glued to their hand continually recording everything, i am shocked that not one of them managed to get any video of these response units at all
My personal view is that it was a game of posturing and bluff. TC assembled his little mob and set off towards the house he used to own, watching to see what the Police would do. The Police replied with a drive-by parade of nearby units, to show they were ready to respond. TC's mob lost their bottle and sensibly withdrew.
The Police can play this game forever. In the time it takes the Crawfools to muster a mob and whip them into readiness for violent criminal acts, the Police easily can assemble a faster and better defence force to stop them.
It's almost like they get paid to do it.The Police can play this game forever.
That's hilarious. I hope they march off to the Police station and file a complaint.vampireLOREN wrote:Some Facebook stuff, Young Craig posted a photo of someone's torn up arm. Apparently while rattling the steel mesh fence a bright spark reached in to retrieve his phone which had let slip and the guard dog bit him then proceeded to chew up the phone.
Common sense suggested he was wrong. Why can't a guard dog be used "on a dwelling"? And what makes a dog a guard dog, rather than a family pet?Craig wrote:Someone was attacked by an attack dog yesterday at my parents house... If you're discusted in this feel free to complain!! Remember. All this could happen to you next.
They can't be used on a dwelling!!
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1975/50
Do your job coppers!!!
It may need reading twice, but then the meaning is clear. A dwelling-house and its land aren't "premises" within the meaning of this act. A factory would be. So these rules don't apply to dogs at dwellings.“premises” means land other than agricultural land and land within the curtilage of a dwelling-house, and buildings, including parts of buildings, other than dwelling-houses;
You are forgetting it is legalese where black is white, yes means no, lose means win.....not including a dwelling house is obviously legalese for including a dwelling house. To include one thing is to exclude all others.......equals.....only applies to dwelling houses.littleFred wrote:It may need reading twice, but then the meaning is clear.
The property is not secured, it is surrounded by temp fencing
Especially if you stick your arm through a fence where there's a guard dog. Also, please explain how you get your arm through a Heras panel fence because I'm sure they are too narrow. But if you tried to get through a gap between panels then that would be different, because then I'd wonder what the hell you were up to.Someone was attacked by an attack dog yesterday at my parents house... If you're discusted in this feel free to complain!! Remember. All this could happen to you next.
Ah but it wasn't a working dog it was an attack dog, Craig says so. Secondly Ronnie "knows F A" Dewison you are almost completely wrong. http://blogs.rspca.org.uk/insights/2014 ... aLIzfDZepQIf my GSD attacked anyone on my property I would be arrested. The law has changed, it is the same for working dogs, regardless. OH unless the dog has been sent in pursuit of a criminal / only if they have been verbally warned. ( By law enforcers, not privately owned dogs ) So my insurance has sky rocketed as from April this year, sadly this has made me decide to neuter my dog. I stand by my first statement, no working dog should attack unless commanded, they can hold, but not attack
Damn. There goes my fun.littleFred wrote:Facebook Eviction fraud of the bank has become a closed group. It has 4239 members, so only those folk will be privy to whatever is discussed behind closed doors.
littleFred wrote:Facebook Eviction fraud of the bank has become a closed group. It has 4239 members, so only those folk will be privy to whatever is discussed behind closed doors.
Better delete it then.This is a group for people to stand in solidarity to save Tom and Sue Crawford from eviction.
littleFred wrote:Facebook Eviction fraud of the bank has become a closed group. It has 4239 members, so only those folk will be privy to whatever is discussed behind closed doors.