The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

PeterPan
Gunners Mate
Gunners Mate
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 8:32 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by PeterPan »

Skeleton wrote:
Colin123 wrote:The reason Jay Brad was the first one arrested is simple

He is not stupid, and he wasn't up there for Tom, he was up there for the self serving, self promoting reasons that are behind everything he does

He would have known he would be arrested at the end of it, so get arrested early on, no stuck on a wet roof all night

Job done !!
Agreed, same with Ceylon, no point being anonymous on a roof when you have your own interests to look after.

Do we know who the other two were? Im half watching the F1 if this has already been answered, apologies.
One appears to be someone they call Tin... This ladies other half I assume.
Image
Skeleton
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:37 am
Location: Thailand

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Skeleton »

Good find, photos on her page of him and this would appear to be Tins Facebook page. One Martin Atkin, who also last posted on the 24 July.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id ... cation=ufi

One more to go :)
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played. :lol: :lol:
Colin123
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:11 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Colin123 »

Deleted
Last edited by Colin123 on Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2186
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Hercule Parrot »

Some photos here of the daring commando mission -
To be honest it looks a bit dismal. A couple of elite 'special forces' pikeys climbing over via a shed roof or something. Security not paying much attention, but it wouldn't have made any difference. No sign of noxious sprays.
https://www.facebook.com/freeman.o.net/ ... 3489982449
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Jeffrey »

non english speaking security guards
Please tell me again how the Crawford supporters aren't racists.
Skeleton
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:37 am
Location: Thailand

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Skeleton »

Hercule Parrot wrote:Some photos here of the daring commando mission -
To be honest it looks a bit dismal. A couple of elite 'special forces' pikeys climbing over via a shed roof or something. Security not paying much attention, but it wouldn't have made any difference. No sign of noxious sprays.
https://www.facebook.com/freeman.o.net/ ... 3489982449
Security did the right thing, no point in fighting them. I have a feeling i now know who Mr 6 is but I am not certain so will say no more.
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played. :lol: :lol:
Normal Wisdom
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 902
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:28 am
Location: England, UK

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Normal Wisdom »

GH132 wrote:Image

Somebody posting on Craig's Facebook ... I doubt this will stay up for long ! !

OR .. they'll reply saying it was paid 3 or 4 times over so they owe nothing !
A while ago I got into a very similar discussion with Craig on the Hannah Shotbolt FB page (for once she saw the Crawfrauds for what they were so wasn't going to delete the messages). Eventually after going round in circles a bit, Craig admitted that he had no understanding about endowment mortgages etc but simply could not believe that his Mum and Dad would be so stupid as to not pay their mortgage.
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Jeffrey »

Craig must have been 5(?) years old when they stopped paying the policy if not younger, so he clearly has no idea what went on.
PeterPan
Gunners Mate
Gunners Mate
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 8:32 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by PeterPan »

http://m.nottinghampost.com/Tom-Crawfor ... story.html

New article in evening post about the arrests.

Image

Mark Hawkins is the 6th person then I suspect!
Last edited by PeterPan on Sun Jul 26, 2015 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Jeffrey »

So , Craig and Ginger are roommates?
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by AndyPandy »

PeterPan wrote:http://m.nottinghampost.com/Tom-Crawfor ... story.html

New article in evening post about the arrests.

Image
Craig Crawford has been charged and he's talking about it on his facebook page, has he never heard of the concept of Sub Judice

adjectiveLAW
under judicial consideration and therefore prohibited from public discussion elsewhere.
"the cases were still sub judice"

No of course he hasn't, what on earth was I thinking! :roll: :haha:
timcurgenven1
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by timcurgenven1 »

Which one is ceylon?
rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by rumpelstilzchen »

The Nottingham Post really should refrain from repeatedly posting "the bank claims he is in debt by more than £43000 on his mortgage" as that tends to suggest there is some doubt about the matter. They should get their act together and employ a decent writer. The bank proved in court that Crawford owes more than £43000. End of.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
PeterPan
Gunners Mate
Gunners Mate
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 8:32 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by PeterPan »

I assume the three not named are Ceylon, Henry Kellie and Betty Berkeley (Liz).
Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2186
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Hercule Parrot »

rumpelstilzchen wrote:The Nottingham Post really should refrain from repeatedly posting "the bank claims he is in debt by more than £43000 on his mortgage" as that tends to suggest there is some doubt about the matter.
I agree. It reads as if the bank has not yet proved their claim. Poor journalism.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Jeffrey »

Ceylon is the 51 year old right?

It would make sense for him to remain in jail since 1. He's broke and can't afford bail and 2. He has prior convictions.
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by AndyPandy »

Jeffrey wrote:Ceylon is the 51 year old right?

It would make sense for him to remain in jail since 1. He's broke and can't afford bail and 2. He has prior convictions.
3. He's lost his name - dementia in one so young is a terrible thing !!
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3759
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

PeterPan wrote:I assume the three not named are Ceylon, Henry Kellie and Betty Berkeley (Liz).
I think so. Ceylon = Mark Haining (51).
Anyone want a laugh? The posting of "relevant" adverts has caused an ad showing "Expert tips on getting on the property ladder" at the end of the Nottingham Post piece.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
PeanutGallery
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1581
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:11 pm
Location: In a gallery, with Peanuts.

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by PeanutGallery »

I could have understood this if the roof top demo mob were young. You could put it down to the stupidity and gullibility of youth being easily swayed by this message. But almost all of them are older than me (well all of them except for Craig) and as such in the group of people I would normally consider to be 'old enough to know better'.
Warning may contain traces of nut
hucknallred
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1103
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:34 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by hucknallred »

Hercule Parrot wrote:
rumpelstilzchen wrote:The Nottingham Post really should refrain from repeatedly posting "the bank claims he is in debt by more than £43000 on his mortgage" as that tends to suggest there is some doubt about the matter.
I agree. It reads as if the bank has not yet proved their claim. Poor journalism.
And the inabilty to not type "cancer sufferer" when Tom Crawford's name is mentioned.
Maybe someone should contact the editor.