The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by AndyPandy »

letissier14 wrote:Desperation has kicked in with the Crawfords

They want to sue me and every other troll :haha:

http://postimg.org/image/a4pqjr5yb/
Starting a LIABLE case against you - OMG :haha: it's just getting better and better
Skeleton
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:37 am
Location: Thailand

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Skeleton »

Amanda is starting to sail very close to the wind. She is married to a serving member of the Armed Forces, Section 69 of the Air Force Act i believe it is details "bringing the service into disrepute" Her husband would not be the first to be marched in and reminded of his obligations to the Act and to pass that message on to his family. I am a little surprised to see that no action appears to have been taken in that direction.
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played. :lol: :lol:
Losleones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 6:49 am
Location: In the real world

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Losleones »

letissier14 wrote:Desperation has kicked in with the Crawfords

They want to sue me and every other troll :haha:

http://postimg.org/image/a4pqjr5yb/
That's a frightening prospect Tiss what with their growing list of "successes" & heavyweight legal representation headed by the mighty Guy Taylor. :shrug:
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Jeffrey »

Who is Donna, Gordon, Darren? Only person I recognize on that list is Danny Bampin.
pigpot
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 546
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:49 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by pigpot »

rumpelstilzchen wrote:pigpot are you aware that this is all done and dusted?
What's done and dusted "RUMP". I'll give you a heads up. NOTHING. The people are not buying into it. Regardless whether YOU think this is real, go onto the internet and these people are popping up everywhere. They want it "RUMP" they feed off it. They are going to get it. The Police... Even the Army don't stand a chance against these people. Sorry I'm wrong because... WHAT... YOU said so. We'll watch it all play out friend. Or are you not my friend... Will you want to DO ME IN just because I don't want to give (currency) or something else to you (another, the Big Man, The Master, The Government, call it what you will) that is demanded of me.
rumpelstilzchen wrote:The people were arrested and held in custody over the weekend and appeared in Nottingham mags' yesterday. Bailed to appear at CC on 10th August.
So by your own word "RUMP" it hasn't ended. AND EVEN IF IT DOES FOR THESE PEOPLE then the there's the NEXT lot. It'll keep on coming. You may need to look to the future as it is changing and peoples perceptions shift. :lol:
Boaz. It's a little like Shazam. It certainly meant a lot to Billy Batson.
Nothing in this post is legal or lawful advice, it is only used for the sake of entertainment.
All "rights" are reserved by this poster.
rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by rumpelstilzchen »

pigpot wrote:What's done and dusted "RUMP".
The rooftop protest.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
pigpot
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 546
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:49 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by pigpot »

Skeleton wrote:Amanda is starting to sail very close to the wind. She is married to a serving member of the Armed Forces, Section 69 of the Air Force Act i believe it is details "bringing the service into disrepute" Her husband would not be the first to be marched in and reminded of his obligations to the Act and to pass that message on to his family. I am a little surprised to see that no action appears to have been taken in that direction.
How scary? Something that applies to one but not another... No link. Yes very clever. :shrug:
Boaz. It's a little like Shazam. It certainly meant a lot to Billy Batson.
Nothing in this post is legal or lawful advice, it is only used for the sake of entertainment.
All "rights" are reserved by this poster.
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

Jeffrey wrote:Who is Donna, Gordon, Darren? Only person I recognize on that list is Danny Bampin.
I'm Gordon :haha:
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Jeffrey wrote:Who is Donna, Gordon, Darren? Only person I recognize on that list is Danny Bampin.
People on Facebook groups opposed to the Crawfords.
While I'm posting, is Mark Gillard going to put in an appearance?
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
pigpot
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 546
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:49 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by pigpot »

rumpelstilzchen wrote:
pigpot wrote:What's done and dusted "RUMP".
The rooftop protest.
As I said "RUMP" that's not it for these people. "IT'S" growing... Like a weed, try stop it. Best of luck. :roll:
Boaz. It's a little like Shazam. It certainly meant a lot to Billy Batson.
Nothing in this post is legal or lawful advice, it is only used for the sake of entertainment.
All "rights" are reserved by this poster.
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
Jeffrey wrote:Who is Donna, Gordon, Darren? Only person I recognize on that list is Danny Bampin.
People on Facebook groups opposed to the Crawfords.
While I'm posting, is Mark Gillard going to put in an appearance?
I believe Mark will be posting later this afternoon
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
pigpot
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 546
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:49 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by pigpot »

See you over on Marc's site. You're too comfortable here. Just an idea to take you OUT of your comfort zone. Come on... I've come over there and I've been unoffensive so why not reciprocate. :?:
Boaz. It's a little like Shazam. It certainly meant a lot to Billy Batson.
Nothing in this post is legal or lawful advice, it is only used for the sake of entertainment.
All "rights" are reserved by this poster.
Syf
Cannoneer
Cannoneer
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Syf »

guilty wrote:Ceylon is promising to tell the GOOFers what really happened:
got out last night so been a little busy but will try and catch up and share what happened
We know what happened, he was a naughty boy and went to court. he lost the name, his DOB was just hearsay and he lives in his heart. Mr judge didn't take to kindly to the nonsense and after being told off somewhat his case of amnesia quickly wore off and remembered all his particulars :lol: :lol:
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by AndyPandy »

Losleones wrote:
letissier14 wrote:Desperation has kicked in with the Crawfords

They want to sue me and every other troll :haha:

http://postimg.org/image/a4pqjr5yb/
That's a frightening prospect Tiss what with their growing list of "successes" & heavyweight legal representation headed by the mighty Guy Taylor. :shrug:
Are they going to pitch up at the Royal Courts of Justice with a 'Liable' Order in their sweaty mitts, only for Master McCloud to ask 'do you mean Libel' !!
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

AndyPandy wrote: Are they going to pitch up at the Royal Courts of Justice with a 'Liable' Order in their sweaty mitts, only for Master McCloud to ask 'do you mean Libel' !!
I love the fact that she has lists of people that they intend to take to court
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
Skeleton
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:37 am
Location: Thailand

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Skeleton »

pigpot wrote:
Skeleton wrote: How scary? Something that applies to one but not another... No link. Yes very clever. :shrug:
Scary? I wasn't trying to scare anyone, and for the record my post was not in reply to any previous posts. I was making a general comment based on my past experience.

I do not know what link you require, maybe one that details the relevant section of the Air Force Act? I am sure you are more than capable of looking that up yourself.

You seem to know everything else.
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played. :lol: :lol:
Syf
Cannoneer
Cannoneer
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:39 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Syf »

No doubt my name will be on the list.. :lol: :lol:
rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by rumpelstilzchen »

Syf wrote:No doubt my name will be on the list.. :lol: :lol:
This is getting to be like that Dad's Army moment.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by rumpelstilzchen »

pigpot wrote:"IT'S" growing...
Rub some oinkment on it.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Just an example of where I'm coming from regarding comments: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-le ... e-33687420
Police have told people not to post anything online that might prejudice the court proceedings.

"Criminal proceedings have now commenced and the defendant has the right to a fair trial," a statement said.

"It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings."
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self