That almost sounds like a threat.pigpot wrote: Can the childish insults stop as I can really go for it but I believe the retribution will be only one way......
I'll listen to "Solsbury Hil" by Peter Gabriel thanks rather than reply to your post... "Son he said, grab your things I've come to take you home."Bones wrote:That almost sounds like a threat.pigpot wrote: Can the childish insults stop as I can really go for it but I believe the retribution will be only one way......
Bring it on, I must warn you, I have a 5th Dan black belt in childish insults
I have many moves, such as yo momma jokes and I am not afraid to use them
Yet you still replied to my postpigpot wrote: I'll listen to "Solsbury Hil" by Peter Gabriel thanks rather than reply to your post...
"Hil" not Hill... "i.q." and I.Q. Honestly... mistakes on purpose...Bones wrote:Yet you still replied to my postpigpot wrote: I'll listen to "Solsbury Hil" by Peter Gabriel thanks rather than reply to your post...
Guessing you struggle on the old iq front
He cracks himself up.pigpot wrote:
...
If you ask me they are.AndyK wrote: If only his reasoning powers were as good as his sense of humor.
But no better, certainly.longdog wrote:If you ask me they are.AndyK wrote: If only his reasoning powers were as good as his sense of humor.
I see. You would rather wait until after the event before you reveal to us what you were betting on. No surprises there.pigpot wrote:
Wait your time.
pigpot wrote:
That one day Santos will get out of jail. Clear win for Santos, utter humiliation for the powers that berumpelstilzchen wrote:That is ambiguous. Please explain in precise detail what you are betting on.pigpot wrote:
This is an interesting one. It's a long game this one........ My bets (and many others) is on Santos.
[/quote]Broward judges toss 24,000 red-light camera tickets totaling millions
Two Broward County traffic judges dismissed 24,000 pending red-light camera ticket cases Monday, ruling that the program violates Florida law.
By Brian Ballou South Florida Sun-Sentinelcontact the reporter
Trials and Arbitration American Traffic Solutions
At $264 per ticket, the value of fines would have been $6.3 million
Palm Beach County and Miami-Dade County set to hear similar cases
Judges rule that third-party screening violates state law
Two Broward County traffic judges dismissed 24,000 pending red-light camera ticket cases Monday, ruling that the program violates Florida law.
lRelated
Updated map: Red light cameras in South Florida
Florida News
Updated map: Red light cameras in South Florida
See all related
8
Fines from those citations, which came from nearly every city in the county, would have amounted to more than $6.3 million, with each ticket at $264.
Updated map: Red light cameras in South Florida
Updated map: Red light cameras in South Florida
"We made the argument that the program was an improper delegation of police power because the videos were being sent out of state for employees of American Traffic Solutions to do the screening," said Ted Hollander, an attorney with Ticket Clinic. He said the firm has challenged the program for more than four years on behalf of clients.
American Traffic Solutions, a vendor based in Arizona, reviewed videos captured by traffic cameras in Broward County before forwarding them to local police for ticketing. State law mandates that only law enforcement can issue violations.
cComments
Since the judgement I have personally witnessed cars one after another zooming right through lights all over Broward county...its not a free ride to put others in danger people! They need more Cops out there doing their jobs!!!
trucker79
at 8:55 PM March 20, 2015
Add a comment See all comments
21
"You can't enforce one law and break another, which is what these cities have been doing for the better part of four years now." Hollander said.
Other cities around South Florida have ended red-light camera programs. Boca Raton stopped its program last month, joining other municipalities like Palm Beach County, Margate, Hallandale Beach and Coral Springs, which have put a stop to red-light camera tickets.
Red-light ticket refunds? Not so fast
Red-light ticket refunds? Not so fast
Fort Lauderdale suspended its red light traffic program on March 6, after a Broward traffic court ruled that it violated the statute. The City Commission is expected to discuss the matter at its regular meeting Tuesday night. Mayor Jack Seiler declined to comment on the case, saying he didn't have enough information on the latest ruling.
Hearings are scheduled for cases in Aventura on March 30 and in Boynton Beach on April 1 and in Polk County on May 28th. Hollander said a class-action lawsuit has also been filed in federal court in Miami seeking to recoup fines for clients who have paid tickets since the inception of the program four years ago.
Last month, the Fourth District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach declined an appeal by Hollywood over an October ruling that the city could not delegate ticket writing to American Traffic Solutions. Since that ruling, Hollywood has stopped issuing tickets but it continues to operate 18 red-light cameras. The city is evaluating how to best modify the program to align it with state law, and could revisit any violations captured by the cameras.
Cops push message: Red means stop
"Our city attorney has indicated that changes could be made quickly," said Raelin Storey, spokeswoman for Hollywood.
Pigpot, what is bothering you? The fact that traffic cameras were being used, or that the judge ruled against their use? As usual, your point is, at best, ambiguous.pigpot wrote: THIS IS WHAT IS BOTHERING ME. What's going on.
Thank you for the early morning laugh.pigpot wrote:one day Santos will get out of jail. Clear win for Santos
Standard troll tactic. Instead of answering a question directly go off on a loosely related tangent to somehow "prove" his point. Pigpot seems to fall into what I call the "travelling freeman" specialty. Common traits include a belief that police are tools of an oppressive government and that arguing over a minor traffic stop counts as a victory. Any time the police have to change their procedures to enforce the provisions of the Highway Traffic Act becomes meat ripe for their picking so you can expect all sorts of totally meaningless pig spittle from him.noblepa wrote:Pigpot, what is bothering you? The fact that traffic cameras were being used, or that the judge ruled against their use? As usual, your point is, at best, ambiguous.pigpot wrote: THIS IS WHAT IS BOTHERING ME. What's going on.
Also, what the heck does a judge's ruling in a Florida traffic camera case have to do with a sovereign citizen in Australia? Is this simply a thread hijacking?
17-08-2015, 05:49 PM #3
sprat
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 407
Default
Mr Duncan was not acquitted due to the freeman type arguments though!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0pzwa2CzEUCamp Blanding First Amendment Audit
Soooooo... What does that matter to the price of bread at current value? Political, social, economic, common sense, cultural value........ Really....... Remember to ask each of your clients whether he or she is or knows "pigpot" because given the day I'll love to ram it you know where. Asked by a voter to stand for the "Labour Party".....NG3 wrote:I notice Haining's Nazi video appears to have vanished.
The outcome could be one of many. Can you prove the ACTUAL outcome in some kind of, I don't know what, case, ruling, ANYTHING..... What are you ON about....NG3 wrote:YouTube take down, or is he trying to backtrack on his racist views?
Listen if he has... and I don't know the man but it's very easy to produce slander and defamation from the end of an I.P. address without evidence and you are producing it, before the court case and / or the following release or conviction.NG3 wrote:It's all going a bit wrong for Mark, invariably seen now as a confirmed liar, foul mouthed obnoxious deceiver, scam promoter, racist supporter, all whilst facing both criminal and civil actions.
But it's not...NG3 wrote:He's painted himself in to a bit of a corner.
No. Read the thread and you'll have your answers.pigpot wrote:This is just an observation but I don't see what's happening here other than posters stating the obvious. "He broke the law and was summarily jailed and punished. HAHAHAHAHA!" Is that it?
Read it for yourself. It's right there in front of you.From here: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=297331
Who is this Mr Duncan? Does anyone know what he was acquitted for? I've not long found it over on Ickes site. If anyone knows it'll be you guys and girls.
No my WHOLE quote was this:NG3 wrote:No. Read the thread and you'll have your answers.pigpot wrote:This is just an observation but I don't see what's happening here other than posters stating the obvious. "He broke the law and was summarily jailed and punished. HAHAHAHAHA!" Is that it?
Care to answer the whole thing IN IT'S WHOLE? Don't just do the bit part.A few words... such as, "Bias", you have only your business posting assumptions. If though, there is such a thing as law (which I doubt due to an absence of proof / evidence) then let the law remain.
If the law remains then it should be just.
AND HERE are TWO examples where those entrusted with this "sacred" LAW DO NOT APPLY their "trust" to IT.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Allan_Thomas
AND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lesley_Molseed
Tittle tattling and making up stories behind the bike sheds is for kids though....................
NG3 wrote:He's painted himself in to a bit of a corner.