Vile? VILE? A young lovely who can dance herself into your heart with this?fat frank wrote: Amanda, vile women and prob the main reason so many have turned against the crawfords
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB4o10c ... e=youtu.be
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Vile? VILE? A young lovely who can dance herself into your heart with this?fat frank wrote: Amanda, vile women and prob the main reason so many have turned against the crawfords
The Crawfords would never raise enough money this way. As has been noted by others, you need equity in the first place. What hasn't been noted is that you need equity relative to the age of the occupants. If you are 100, you can use 100% of the equity pretty much as stats say you will only be around for another 1-2 years. If you are in your early 60s (and female) you can't use much more than 20-30% of the equity because the chances are you are going to be around for 25-30 years. That's a lot of interest to accumulate.Jeffrey wrote:Way back in the thread I asked why not refinance and go with a reverse mortgage on the equity on the house. Eliminate the 300 pound monthly payment, banks pays you a little bit each month.
If I had a pound for every variation of that, from every loser that's gone down a similar deluded path, I'd be quite happy.Bungle wrote: "On a brighter note I can say we have never been in a position to say all is lost as the opposite is true, the family have always been positive and are now being approached by so many people as our story is spreading quite nicely and whether paid or not the trolls/agents are actually keeping our story going people are taking the time to read and watch and research the major fraud taking place in our country, so far we have won 3 battles- lost 1 and last Thursday's battle is still in progress and there are many more to come.
I mean this in all seriousness, has Tom got mental issues.Bungle wrote:Whatever Tom Crawford is on.....I don't want any of it. This is his latest on EFOTB this morning:
"On a brighter note I can say we have never been in a position to say all is lost as the opposite is true, the family have always been positive and are now being approached by so many people as our story is spreading quite nicely and whether paid or not the trolls/agents are actually keeping our story going people are taking the time to read and watch and research the major fraud taking place in our country, so far we have won 3 battles- lost 1 and last Thursday's battle is still in progress and there are many more to come.
Let us all remember that stolen property always remains the owners.
Sue popped by home yesterday and our house looks a sorry old state but want to say big thank you to the Neighbour's who did a lovely job cleaning the mess the security left behind in the garden and behind the scenes we are working hard to help others".
No, I think you'll find you've lost consistently and completely and the only placed Thursday's battle is in progress is in your head. Do you know what a Civil Retraint Order is? Then again why would you when an endowment mortgage is beyond your graspBungle wrote:Whatever Tom Crawford is on.....I don't want any of it. This is his latest on EFOTB this morning:
"....so far we have won 3 battles- lost 1 and last Thursday's battle is still in progress and there are many more to come.
... lose their homes. Hopefully the trolls and shills will be able to warn any prospective clients off and I can only say that anyone who does accept your help deserves everything that will land on their heads.Bungle wrote:.... we are working hard to help others".
& he's even screwing that up.Bones wrote: They only thing you have left is your family and the crowed that follow you out of pity
This last sentence is worrying on three points.Bungle wrote:
Tom Crawford said:
"Sue popped by home yesterday and our house looks a sorry old state but want to say big thank you to the Neighbour's who did a lovely job cleaning the mess the security left behind in the garden and behind the scenes we are working hard to help others".
What about a big thank you to the poor people that had the task of clearing up the sxxt left by the 'Rooftop Six"?Bungle wrote:
Tom Crawford said:
"want to say big thank you to the Neighbour's who did a lovely job cleaning the mess the security left behind in the garden ".
Very true but with the help of Mr Ebert, Guy Taylor, Michael O'Berncia, Michael O'Deria and of course Mark "ceylon" Haining, Tom has managed to piss it all awayBungle wrote:he could have sold the sold the property, paid off B&B and be left with around £100,000 to purchase somewhere cheaper.
Just for the record and for the Crawfords, especially Amanda and Tom, it legally changed hands on 12/08/2015. So, better go back and change all those posts about "our" house.Bones wrote:Just for the record the property is no longer registered in Tom's name.
The new proprietors of your former castle would like to say a big thank you to all involved in making them a massive return on their investment. I really hope not, but i can see Tom's health declining after this total & utter self destruction.Bungle wrote:What about a big thank you to the poor people that had the task of clearing up the sxxt left by the 'Rooftop Six"?Bungle wrote:
Tom Crawford said:
"want to say big thank you to the Neighbour's who did a lovely job cleaning the mess the security left behind in the garden ".
Please Burnaby, some of us want to keep our heterosexuality.Burnaby49 wrote:Vile? VILE? A young lovely who can dance herself into your heart with this?fat frank wrote: Amanda, vile women and prob the main reason so many have turned against the crawfords
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB4o10c ... e=youtu.be
Bungle wrote:This last sentence is worrying on three points.Bungle wrote:
Tom Crawford said:
"Sue popped by home yesterday and our house looks a sorry old state but want to say big thank you to the Neighbour's who did a lovely job cleaning the mess the security left behind in the garden and behind the scenes we are working hard to help others".
The bungalow is NO LONGER their home.
It is no longer OUR HOUSE.
God help anyone else that he may be assisting.
Jeez, that was seriously disturbing & thankfully I'd eaten prior to watching. Looks like a cross between Kathy Burke & Vicky Pollard. Still , i suppose her husband must find her attractive ........after about 25 pints.PeanutGallery wrote:Please Burnaby, some of us want to keep our heterosexuality.Burnaby49 wrote:Vile? VILE? A young lovely who can dance herself into your heart with this?fat frank wrote: Amanda, vile women and prob the main reason so many have turned against the crawfords
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB4o10c ... e=youtu.be