Pox wrote:More worrying, he used to be a teacher - head of English, no less.
I wonder why he doesn't name the school...
He doesn't name any of the 20 odd schools he says he has worked in.
To have worked in that number of schools throughout a teaching career is a tad unusual
But maybe he has worked as a supply teacher at some point in his career
Pox wrote:More worrying, he used to be a teacher - head of English, no less.
I wonder why he doesn't name the school...
He doesn't name any of the 20 odd schools he says he has worked in.
To have worked in that number of schools throughout a teaching career is a tad unusual
It's very unusual. I've only worked at one educational establishment, and cite that establishment when appropriate, however I know a lot of other people who have worked in education and to a person they list any universities, or schools they held recognised positions at, and in the case of supply teachers they tend to say between year x & year y that they worked as a supply teacher.
Usually when someone purposely omits an employer there's a reason behind it.
NG3 wrote:
I wonder why he doesn't name the school...
He doesn't name any of the 20 odd schools he says he has worked in.
To have worked in that number of schools throughout a teaching career is a tad unusual
Usually when someone purposely omits an employer there's a reason behind it.
Exactly
Where there is smoke.....
I would love to know the schools (if indeed there are ANY?, who knows with this lot?)
Pox wrote:More worrying, he used to be a teacher - head of English, no less.
I wonder why he doesn't name the school...
He doesn't name any of the 20 odd schools he says he has worked in.
To have worked in that number of schools throughout a teaching career is a tad unusual
But maybe he has worked as a supply teacher at some point in his career
NG3 wrote:
I wonder why he doesn't name the school...
He doesn't name any of the 20 odd schools he says he has worked in.
To have worked in that number of schools throughout a teaching career is a tad unusual
But maybe he has worked as a supply teacher at some point in his career
notorial dissent wrote:I think that was a prairie dog, but they are determined little critters, too.
Here is a picture that's definitely a Canadian Beaver, it screams Burnaby!
Where the hell did you get that? Aren't you aware you are not allowed to post photos of other Quatloos contributors?
Apart from the above blatant abuse of Quatloos privileges there are two pictures of me in the public domain, both on Google Street View. In one I'm standing at my front door watching the camera car go by, in the other I'm walking down my back lane heading home from the Skytrain station.
And yes, it is a prairie dog. I couldn't be bothered to spend too much time looking for the correct mammal and we have a lot more prairie dogs than we do beaver.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
Burnaby49 wrote:And yes, it is a prairie dog. I couldn't be bothered to spend too much time looking for the correct mammal and we have a lot more prairie dogs than we do beaver.
And, strangely, the UK has far more beavers than prairie dogs!
"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
Tom Crawford Transcript update for those who made a contribution.
I'm hoping to hear today or tomorrow that the audio is with the trascriber! Then we should get an estimate of when the trasncription will be ready and I'm hopeful, if not confident, that we should have the words in our inboxes fairly soon.
I suggest the transcript is sent to subscribers as soon as it arrives after which we all agree not to release it for, say, 24 hours so those who've paid can read an digest it before the non-paying public get their chance to see it.
YiamCross wrote:Tom Crawford Transcript update for those who made a contribution.
I'm hoping to hear today or tomorrow that the audio is with the trascriber! Then we should get an estimate of when the trasncription will be ready and I'm hopeful, if not confident, that we should have the words in our inboxes fairly soon.
I suggest the transcript is sent to subscribers as soon as it arrives after which we all agree not to release it for, say, 24 hours so those who've paid can read an digest it before the non-paying public get their chance to see it.
As Tom would say, thoughts please....
It's a bit eletist to keep it away from us paupers.
With the audio, will it be possible to hire an expert to "listen between the lines" ?
hardcopy wrote:
It's a bit eletist to keep it away from us paupers.
With the audio, will it be possible to hire an expert to "listen between the lines" ?
We shill troll banker illuminati types are the elite of the elite so what do you expect?
If the Ebert transcript which was posted on FB the other day is anything to go by, there's plenty to find between the lines.
It was long but worth the time to read it. Hilarious. I can't see Tob Crawford being able to match that but I live in hope.
