Oh dear, he doesn't understand journalism, does he?
Regarding the class action: Peter announced it on his
public FB page, where 17 people have said they are in.
How about the private WeRe Bank forum. Obviously this is where the detail is thrashed out, who is sueing who for what, and when, and so on, right?
Wrong. Peter has said nothing about it on his private forum. Mind you, he rarely says anything. But the suckers are eagerly discussing this wonderful development, right?
Wrong. Only two members (150180SW and 170959MM) express support, in the thread "Raising Money For Class Action", started by 150180SW.
150180SW ("Sammy") has previously been sceptical, eg about the meeting that never happened, and the Firstplus "success" thread that vanished, how Peter misinterprets BoE 1882, and it doesn't apply in the USA, and so on.
I've mentioned here that 170959MM (Michael David Meehan) failed to pay council tax, gas, electric and BT bills with WeRe cheques, and lost in court over the council tax. He was annoyed with Peter for not supporting the court case. He said recently, 17 September, that "it ain't rocket science to discern that WeRe Bank's Achilles Heel is their lack of LEGAL support".
Why are Sammy and Michael now supporting Peter? Do they think Peter stands a snowball's chance against the Mirror newspaper? Has Peter bought them off somehow? I don't know.
On the negative side, 160365SG cautions that "there is absolutely no guarantee of winning the case". Well, indeed; it's a guaranteed fail. More likely still, Peter will take any fighting fund and not fight at all, aside from ranting on FB.
I don't think it's been mentioned on Q, that Peter has started using the
WeRe Bank FB page.