No, the reason you can't win an argument with "these" people, or any group like this, is that they don't want to, an never intend to, listen to or hear anything that doesn't agree with their current fantasy. It is the same with the sovcit crowd when arguing about a law or laws. Many of them really are functionally illiterate, but a good proportion are intentionally illiterate when it comes to hearing something that contradicts them.PeanutGallery wrote:You can't win arguments with these people because they don't have the acumen to recognise where they might be mistaken and their grasp of what should be is nebulous at best.
I don't know how they do it in England, but here I've seen formal and official documents, warrants, indictments, etc that were simply typed out on plain paper and signed, sometimes with a seal and sometimes not, although usually there is a seal of some kind. I've also seen them come out on fancy letterhead and looking all but offset printed, and sealed with fancy seals and all. It just varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. One thing they generally have in common though is that they are served at the end of someone official, like a policeman or deputy sheriff, and that pretty much makes them "real" and "official", you want to argue about it, you go in to court, you don't do it at the time, that just usually gets you jailed.
