Moderator: Burnaby49
On this point I have to agree. Ninj was only speaking from a PERSONAL (and rather emotional) point of view, as opposed to a LEGAL point of view. Personal opinions are protected under freedom of speech laws. He did not name any party, nor quote any portion of the case law.bmxninja357 wrote:I have not quoted the case or named anyone but Allan himself. Therefore no edits required.
Peace.
Ninj
Which is why I edited my posting but not ninjas. He was talking about a friend who had family problems. He gave this as a possible reason why Boisjoli started going overboard. Entirely valid. I was providing information from the banned decision itself.Wake Up! Productions wrote:On this point I have to agree. Ninj was only speaking from a PERSONAL (and rather emotional) point of view, as opposed to a LEGAL point of view. Personal opinions are protected under freedom of speech laws. He did not name any party, nor quote any portion of the case law.bmxninja357 wrote:I have not quoted the case or named anyone but Allan himself. Therefore no edits required.
Peace.
Ninj
As much as I respect you, Jeffery, you are out of line.
Mark Simser is a Dean Clifford fanboy. I have had a few run ins with him on Youtube. This is his channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChseRt ... sT0tvUBePQLordEd wrote:Quick search on our notary friend's name brings up this document:
http://sovcom.net/wp-content/uploads/20 ... stille.pdf
Not our friend Allen, but there's enough sovereign citizen marks to make a decent drinking game.This "Mark-Randolph: Simser " doesn't seem to be on quatloos on a quick search. Could be some gold here. Wonder who else this notary will lead us to.
- Red ink fingerprints
- Postage stamp
- Defendants including everyone including ALL POLICE SERVICES, the united nations (both lower AND uppercase), and the vatican (also both lower and uppercase)
- Notarized
- "Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. " (also lower and uppercase)
- Name trademarked
- Bible law
Hm, also an envelope from "Sovereign squamish nation government" Mission BC.
One page has a TON of stamps and signatures on it. Must be really official.
These guys don't much bother with spellcheck. This is how Boisjoli describes himself on LinkedIn;Philistine wrote:Ooo. "Deed of Alodial Tiltle" . Not allodial mind you.
Contarct?Allen-Nelson Boisjoli
Contarct Negotiation and mediation
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Financial Services
Current
ALLEN BOISJOLI HOLDINGS, SETH BOISJOLI, TIEL BOISJOLI
Previous
Microsoft, Colorado Custom Decks
Education
Hilsdale College
Perhaps it's a clever semantic out.Burnaby49 wrote:
Contarct?
Is it 'dede alodial til'tle'? If so that is a recipe for vegetarian duck cheeks in high Elf.Philistine wrote:Ooo. "Deed of Alodial Tiltle" . Not allodial mind you.
And I responded;This "Mark-Randolph: Simser " doesn't seem to be on quatloos on a quick search. Could be some gold here. Wonder who else this notary will lead us to.
And so I looked into Simser. I ended up getting a bunch of court documents to tell his story. Or one of his stories. Very similar in it's way to Boisjoli. Traffic stop, sues police officer for money owing, ends up in court, documents notarized by Powell, gets stomped on.I'd already saved a copy of that gem. Superb use of colour as a visual aid. I'm looking in to Simster (sic).
If you look at the non-sovereign stuff, the deck he built (or claims to have) looks pretty good to me.Burnaby49 wrote:This is how Boisjoli describes himself on LinkedIn;
Ninja said that he was a hard worker who was in construction so no doubt he has practical skills. They just don't include winning in court.LordEd wrote:If you look at the non-sovereign stuff, the deck he built (or claims to have) looks pretty good to me.Burnaby49 wrote:This is how Boisjoli describes himself on LinkedIn;
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eg056bebr87a8kq/nH-biUnV5w
Some Facebook editor has a particularly well-developed sense of irony.Burnaby49 wrote:So how is Boisjoli getting away with "Sentient Man"?
However the Sentient Man does face this little vexatious problem;Sentient Man
4 hrs ·
i have my reply/rebuttal almost done for Justice Rooke...the "top judge" in alberta...lol what a fuckin joke...wait tell you read it...i followed that ladies example the affidavit "Fuck this Court"..I am almost done will post in a few min. keep your shit on...all of you will want to read this i am sure of it!!
Since Boisjoli cannot file anything at all at any Alberta court, including a reply/rebuttal, without the expressed permission of the court itself his avenues of attack, at least to an amateur at these kinds of things like myself, seem extremely limited. So I await with great interest how he plans to land his devastating blow.[125] In conclusion, I order that Allen Nelson Boisjoli is a vexatious litigant and is immediately, on an interim basis restricted from filing or continuing actions in all Alberta Courts. A final vexatious litigant declaration is subject to any submissions of the Attorney Generals.
My mistake! It has been pointed out to me that the "Fuck this Court" comment had nothing to do with the Deanster but came from here;I'm assuming that "i followed that ladies example the affidavit "Fuck this Court"." refers to Dean Clifford's now notorious You Tube video. We've all seen how well that approach is working for Dean.
Or this;7. The promissory note was an offer, a promise to pay if anyone could validate the debt...and yes a violation ticket IS a fraudulent debt instrument you frikkin moron, any fool knows this! ...and again “YOU” are psychopathic old codger and it shows how truly ignorant of law “YOU” really are. I am very confident that no-one can verify or validate this debt instrument as it is made up fiat, fictional, bullshit, and; how could anyone even possibly "pay" the thing with "legal tender" when your frikkin FIAT, FRAUDULENT BILLS OF EXCAHNGE/PROMISORRY NOTES we consider “cash” are actually DEBT instruments?!? How the hell does one pay a debt with DEBT? You stupid old ignoramus!!?!
8. A common-law copyright certainly does exist on MY name and if you weren’t such a moron and would care to read the submission of my “Commercial Security Agreement”, which has been entered into EVERY court proceeding I have ever been involved in, down at Queen’s Bench AND the Provincial Court “YOU” will find my 55+ page affidavit claiming the name and then registering the name and strawman account with a UCC-1 and PPSA financing statement, and copyrighting it with a chance for rebuttal! Which, by the way, has yet to be rebutted to this date! It stands as truth in law, as an unrebutted affidavit! MORON!
9. All of these documents were signed under oath as affidavits; and none were replied to, or rebutted...again acquiescence....an unattributed affidavit stands as truth in law.
10. All of your nonsensical gobble-gook, legalese BABEL, you quote in your irrelevant decision is null and void for 2 reasons: #1. Most everything...especially the Judicature Act is contrary or inferior to the Constitution see section 52, and; #2. Its FICTION OF LAW that only applies to the fictional strawman creation called the “person” (see page 3 of the FACTUM, i.e FICTION OF LAW)
But Rooke has one last chance to avoid the horrendous consequences of his foolishness, abject surrender;12. If this is the best you can do and are one of Alberta's "TOP JUDGES", as the article suggests, in the Edmonton Sun, dated October 9, 2015, then you people haven't got a frikkin leg to stand on! I would suggest that if you don’t retract your retarded decision I will bill you for every instance you have used my “name”, as it is a copyrighted trade-marked/trade-name, you incomprehensible psychopathic MORON!
13. Your position is so weak, all I have to do is ask one simple question and you will be my lil bitch forever i.e.: Can you provide facts or evidence that any of your bullshit legislation/statuate codes/acts applies or pertains to me, or ANYONE who does not work for your made-up, imaginary, pseudo-government (which is really a publically listed corporation trading for profit with registered shareholders; See Dun & Bradstreet and page 4 of the FACTUM), without using circular reasoning. i.e. The codes applies because the codes say they apply.
But it ends on a positive note!P.S. one final thing...do you actually think anyone gives give a rats-ass about your frikkin OPINION or your frikkin fraudulent court? “YOU” are a frikkin joke and an IMBICILE! I have sent you a 10 page rebuttal of your Meads v. Meads “decision” (which is actually just a pathetic, unlearned, OPINION), you don’t get to make ANY more “decisions”/OPINION unless you can rebut that first! You better pack-up your shit and go on home and wait for my bill for your trespasses, and if you are smart you will never mention my name or cross my path again. Oh and I expect a public retraction to your BULLSHIT in the Edmonton Sun and/or Edmonton Journal…or I will bill you for every instance that you used my copyrighted trade-marked/tradename, you pathetic old fool!
I would note that, for some reason, our naughty notary Edward J. Powell has not used his judicial powers to turned this document into an official court order. Perhaps Boisjoli now has so much legal power on his side that no assistance is needed from Powell's court.Without prejudice, ill-will, vexation, or frivolity,
A.K.A. ALLEN BOISJOLI™DBA ALLEN BOISJOLI HOLDINGS™
1. Justice Rooke, “YOU” keep quoting and relying on your Meeds v. Meeds decision...like you
are some respected authority figure or something, and “WE” should take your retarded
OPINION to actually have some merit. Well I sent you a 10 page rebuttal on that…your
OPINION and “decisions” mean absolutely ZERO unless you can rebut that first you old coot.
“YOU” will have to first reply and rebut that point for point to have ANY credibility at all.