Dave John Clapham The banks have corrupted parliaments and courts in order to achieve their seemingly invincible position. Through the parliaments, banks have set in place legislation which form the blue print and provide the means to realize their goal.
However, such legislation can only be enforced through the courts where, if justice were to prevail, bad laws would be vetoed and rejected in fair trials or tribunals. That is why the banks have to have dominance over the courts. They do this by firstly controlling the judges and secondly eliminating juries - thereby removing any possibility that the judges may "do right" or that the people may exercise their will.
But there is a chink in the banks' armour - an Achilles' heel. There is a way to smash the banks by proclaiming a simple truth which the banks have swept aside in the implementation of their practice of issuing loan contracts.
The truth is in the meaning of the word, "variable", as found in the Oxford English Dictionary. "Variable" means "uncertain" and "certain" means "not variable". For contracts to be valid under the common law, there must be "certainty of terms" as an essential element. Therefore, all loan contracts in which the banks have incorporated variable interest rates are invalid. Those loans are illegal and the banks are common law criminals.
The judges know this and are concealing this serious offence. This website exposes the incompetence, corruption and treachery in the judiciary.
Magna Carta says, "To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay, Right or Justice.". Unless the banks can be defeated, such noble principles are gone and the people, having no rights, are merely slaves.
What a load of crap, when the Magna Carta was written the 'common man' had NO rights, it's only during the 20th Century that basic Human Rights began to be introduced.
These people need to study their history and the way their Grandparents lived to realise actually, we don't have it so bad !!
PeanutGallery wrote:
But we didn't have the last laugh yet, we've had the first laugh, the middle laughs, the actual eviction laughs, the Betty laughs, we've had loads of laughs, and we know it's not over, because now at the end of a lovely dinner and a show we sit waiting patiently for the bill to arrive in the hope it will provide an encore performance.
Bravo! Bravo! Waiter, please bring me a large caramel mocha with extra cream.
PeanutGallery wrote:
But we didn't have the last laugh yet, we've had the first laugh, the middle laughs, the actual eviction laughs, the Betty laughs, we've had loads of laughs, and we know it's not over, because now at the end of a lovely dinner and a show we sit waiting patiently for the bill to arrive in the hope it will provide an encore performance.
Bravo! Bravo! Waiter, please bring me a large caramel mocha with extra cream.
As long as the bill is stamped and has a wet signature we may even consider paying it. That is if we have contracted of course.
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played.
Skeleton wrote:
As long as the bill is stamped and has a wet signature we may even consider paying it. That is if we have contracted of course.
Coffee... Plant... Made by god.
Caramel... From sugar cane / beet... Plant.... Made by god.
Cream... From cows... Made by god.
Water... Rain... Made by god.
So a large caramel mocha with extra cream was made by god so why should you have to pay for anything that was free from god? It was yours to begin with you sheeple!!!!!!!BOOM!!!111!!!!ONE!!!
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
I think the reason Tom hasn't tried it is because he's convinced himself that he doesn't owe anything, so why should he spend ANY money (real or imaginary) on a thing he has convinced himself he's paid enough for. It's stubborn stupidity. Quite wonderful to watch.
Footloose52 wrote:I wonder if they'll accept payment in Re or even this new 'legal tender' Peter is talking about. I'm surprised Tom hasn't tried it yet.
I don't think it is going to be 'new'. This will be the usual PoE offering - Re notes (without the gold because that costs too much) photocopied at the local CopyShop and distributed sold to his 'customers' so that they can 'spend' the 'legal tender' in shops.
"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
Following the same principles which make a promise to pay the same as payment over in Footlerland / Goofsville all he needs to do is write the word 'gold' on a piece of paper and it becomes gold.
It's all to do with energy transfer and stuff far too complex for the likes of me and thee to comprehend.... Or something.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
longdog wrote:Following the same principles which make a promise to pay the same as payment over in Footlerland / Goofsville all he needs to do is write the word 'gold' on a piece of paper and it becomes gold.
It's all to do with energy transfer and stuff far too complex for the likes of me and thee to comprehend.... Or something.
Gold crayon.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
The full transcript of the latest failed judgment of the Crawfrauds has been received and everyone who has paid towards it will receive a copy within the next 24 hours.
Once everyone has received their copy, it will be made public
I will say that it looks like he has received the final bill as in the judgment he claims B&B are asking him for £98k and that's after the house had been sold
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
letissier14 wrote:
I will say that it looks like he has received the final bill as in the judgment he claims B&B are asking him for £98k and that's after the house had been sold
That's one costly screw up.
If he'd had sold the house, and paid the debt, he'd have had about £50k in his pocket, instead he acted like an idiot and owes close to £100k.
That's a price of £150k for being a dick.
I'd want something a lot better than that for that amount of money.
386. Mr Crawford : This isn’t arguing, he just stated that there was a shortfall in the sale, now
that shortfall they were asking £43,000, you’ve got the figures there …
387. Mr Justice Phillips : Mhmm.
388. Mr Crawford : … £43,000, they sold the property for £55,000, they put no costs in after
the last hearing, they now are asking another £98,000 on top of that with no accounts once
again, they are acting as a fraudulent company.
..... 