Peter of England: He's going to be in REal trouble

[notorial dissent]

Almost but not quite to reality. So close yet so very far.

[Skeleton]

We opening a book on this?

Even odds favourite that Post is gone very shortly along with member 251250MR .

10/1 POE blames member 251250MR for not knowing how to fill out cheques correctly.

25/1 POE has a rant that ignores member 251250MR's questions and blames the banks that use real cheques for not accepting his.

50/1 POE produces a new video showing once again how people are not following his instructions, and contains another plug for some more marks to send him cash only.

1000/1 POE answers just 1 question or point raised by member 251250MR clearly, concisely and with a bit of respect toward his customer.

[FN75]

The comment about him being a 'state champion archer' seems so out of place...wonder if at that exact moment he was thinking about putting his arrows to good use...

[Hercule Parrot]

But if, as he says, he's signing up 65 people a DAY in the USA at $80 each, in the USA alone he's on track to collect at least $1.5 million a year, probably closer to $2 million - in cash, tax free, sent to an anonymous mailbox in a seedy party of Manchester. So one has to ask the question - why would he need to use WeRe Bank and go through all the grief members are going through trying to get their cheques cleared?! He's going to be a millionaire whatever happens. A cash millionaire, that he can actually use to buy things, not a Re millionaire with a book of cheques no-one will accept.

Meanwhile, Re members are ending up in a worse position than they were before, and Peter is unconcerned. Something is very wrong here.

How can the idiots read this without realising the grotesque scam that's being played out upon them?

[AndyPandy]

But if, as he says, he's signing up 65 people a DAY in the USA at $80 each, in the USA alone he's on track to collect at least $1.5 million a year, probably closer to $2 million - in cash, tax free, sent to an anonymous mailbox in a seedy party of Manchester. So one has to ask the question - why would he need to use WeRe Bank and go through all the grief members are going through trying to get their cheques cleared?! He's going to be a millionaire whatever happens. A cash millionaire, that he can actually use to buy things, not a Re millionaire with a book of cheques no-one will accept.

Meanwhile, Re members are ending up in a worse position than they were before, and Peter is unconcerned. Something is very wrong here.

How can the idiots read this without realising the grotesque scam that's being played out upon them?

Because they don't want to.

[PeanutGallery]

Not only do they not want to recognise it, but when their involvement reaches a certain point they will defend the scam and scammer, because any attempt to make them realise that they have been scammed is taken by them to be a personal attack. As such close friends and family members generally don't bring it up, because they don't want the aggravation of doing so, while strangers are written off as not being smart enough to understand it.

It's a pattern of behaviour that can be seen in a number of videos on the thinkjessica website. Peter's target audience are already those I think it would be fair to describe as being vulnerable adults, they are already in financial difficulties, they harbour a negative view towards the traditional financial system and they have been thoroughly prepared for the scam by other guru's or helpful idiots.

The internet, and certain forums (where the mods like to talk about paths) finally allows them to reinforce each others belief that they have made the right choice. Note that a common theme among the scammed is that negative comments are trolling and that only positive comments are welcomed. This creates a false sense of security among the scammed, they gain confidence from each other, and this further entrenches them.

The more entrenched they are the more to a certain sense addicted they become. Each cheque they write, that might be the cheque that finally works, it might be the one to write their debts off, others have reported that their cheques worked (helpful idiots) and Peter actively heaps scorn on those who ask questions - which in turn helps to prevent the meeker members from asking questions and at the same time triggers a mob mentality to attack the questioner and blame them for the failure.

Whether he knows what he's doing or not, Peter is a dangerous scammer admittedly to a limited group of those already vulnerable and facing destitution.

[Bones]

More from Tesco in the WeRe Forum

[Hercule Parrot]

Not only do they not want to recognise it, but when their involvement reaches a certain point they will defend the scam and scammer, because any attempt to make them realise that they have been scammed is taken by them to be a personal attack. As such close friends and family members generally don't bring it up, because they don't want the aggravation of doing so, while strangers are written off as not being smart enough to understand it.

Thanks Peanut - a very helpful and compassionate comment.

[Hercule Parrot]

More from Tesco in the WeRe Forum

Tesco were not being very helpful there. They could have suggested that the customer went into his nearest branch of werebank and withdrew £6,304 in cash. They could then have paid that cash into Tesco Bank through any High Street bank or post office, using the Giro system.

[pigpot]

Whether he knows what he's doing or not, Peter is a dangerous scammer admittedly to a limited group of those already vulnerable and facing destitution.

Fair enough if you say so. Can you point me to any "Court" case that backs up your assertion please.

TTFN.

[PeanutGallery]

Whether he knows what he's doing or not, Peter is a dangerous scammer admittedly to a limited group of those already vulnerable and facing destitution.

Fair enough if you say so. Can you point me to any "Court" case that backs up your assertion please.

TTFN.

Didn't know I needed a court case to have an opinion about something. Although I suppose if you aren't used to thinking for yourself I can see how you would want others to do it for you piggy.

[Judge Roy Bean]

... Fair enough if you say so. Can you point me to any "Court" case that backs up your assertion please.

TTFN.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, chances are it's a duck.

[notorial dissent]

And in this case, stinks like a duck!!!!!

Conversely, I also don't need a court case to know that if you take bare hold of the business end of a red hot poker you are going to fry your hand. You are entitled to your opinions, such as they are, you are just not entitled to have anyone give them any credence.

[guilty]

PoE says:

ReMovement members are going to be protected and allowed freedom from incursions by bailiffs, Enforcement Officers, bent judiciary, police, courts and council harassment and fines and taxes of every kind.
HOW?

ALL Your documents to civil enforcement agencies, Law firms - [like Shoesmiths],Courts, HMRC, the police and local councils must be stamped with the Re Logo and have written alongside it:

"Refusal to Pay & Refusal To Comply" Re

IF you're displaying the Re Logo - You have IHS

INVIOLABLE HUMAN SOVEREIGNTY

[PeanutGallery]

PoE says:

ReMovement members are going to be protected and allowed freedom from incursions by bailiffs, Enforcement Officers, bent judiciary, police, courts and council harassment and fines and taxes of every kind.
HOW?

ALL Your documents to civil enforcement agencies, Law firms - [like Shoesmiths],Courts, HMRC, the police and local councils must be stamped with the Re Logo and have written alongside it:

"Refusal to Pay & Refusal To Comply" Re

IF you're displaying the Re Logo - You have IHS

INVIOLABLE HUMAN SOVEREIGNTY

I thought Peter's first line was not to fight it and just to pay it? Now he's telling them to refuse to pay? So what are the cheque books for then? Weren't the suckers meant to pay by dodgy cheque? Clearly they've been doing the woo wrong because they've been trying to pay when they should have been refusing to pay.

[Losleones]

Piss Take:

Refusal To Pay & Refusal To Comply

Business as normal then Petey.

[longdog]

Yes... Because a history of refusing to cooperate has always been such a great tactic in court hasn't it?

Remind me Poe... How many successes have you had in court with your 'Freeman Legal Services'?

And while we're talking about your legal prowess what are you going to do when the defendants in your imaginary £150,000 'class action' against the banks write "Refusal to Pay & Refusal To Comply Re <rune sign>" on their summonses?

[Dr. Caligari]

More from the idiot in America who tried and failed to pay her rent with a WeRe Cheque

In other words, "Eviction=Victory!!!!!1!!"


Reminds me of George Orwell:
Ignorance =Strength
War=Peace

[PeanutGallery]

Yes... Because a history of refusing to cooperate has always been such a great tactic in court hasn't it?

Remind me Poe... How many successes have you had in court with your 'Freeman Legal Services'?

And while we're talking about your legal prowess what are you going to do when the defendants in your imaginary £150,000 'class action' against the banks write "Refusal to Pay & Refusal To Comply Re <rune sign>" on their summonses?

Why in the very first thread on Pete I highlighted a video of one of his legal wins. According to Peter he won because the judge had him escorted from the building by the police. It was an 'abandoned the court, so Peter dismissed the case' victory, so not a real win just a make believe imaginary one that the Freemen like to lap up.

[NG3]

...in the very first thread on Pete...

...at 100+ pages time for the next one?

You do the PoE one's so well!