Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 10:33 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
yes and no, they claim they are justified in this, but real innocent people, who are just sat there, giving reports to the paper about the Crawford camp, following them, threatening them, the post would love to run with stories "Crawfords ruined my life" "i am a prisoner in my own home"
it would just show them up to be the scum they really are
it would just show them up to be the scum they really are
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 810
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:49 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
The crazy part is that for all this fake posturing, once again, when faced with two options (behave themselves, or act abusively) they've once again picked the wrong option.Pox wrote: If similar things happen in Nottingham I do hope that there are no mistaken identity situations.
If there's any trouble it won't effect me, I'm not on trial, but if it's reported to the court (even Craig's silly post) it can impact their sentence.
It's actually in their interests to prevent any scenes, or disturbances.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 1:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Hurling abuse at people in the public gallery would do it.fat frank wrote:I think tom and his gang need to attack innocent people, this will be the final nail in the coffin of Tom Crawford,
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:26 pm
- Location: The Gem of God's Earth
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Item 39, 3 Fearn Chase definitely wasn't sold by auction today. The auctioneers slipped another property in in it's place (Item 39A).
"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Phuck me - who's going to be daft enough to stump up that sort of money for a wacko fringe meet of the Big Failure Club?tom Crawford wrote:Unfortunately there has to be a charge for this meeting of £ 25.00 per person, this will cover costs for the venue and printing etc no profit will be made out of it
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 10:33 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
prob same lot who bought in to WeRe bank, with there poisoned money and bought worthless chqaexiledscouser wrote:Phuck me - who's going to be daft enough to stump up that sort of money for a wacko fringe meet of the Big Failure Club?tom Crawford wrote:Unfortunately there has to be a charge for this meeting of £ 25.00 per person, this will cover costs for the venue and printing etc no profit will be made out of it
-
- First Mate
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:58 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Might be worth contacting them for tickets, then when they ask for payment drop the "WE-RE BANK CHEQUE" BOMB
WMD- WEAPON OF MASS DELUSION
WMD- WEAPON OF MASS DELUSION
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:03 pm
- Location: No longer on a train
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Wasn't it suggested that it had sold prior to auction and that was why it was withdrawn?guilty wrote:Item 39, 3 Fearn Chase definitely wasn't sold by auction today. The auctioneers slipped another property in in it's place (Item 39A).
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 10:33 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
yes, but camp Crawford claim that was a lie and it was going ahead, but it didn't, so that proves that the auction house believe the house was stolen and the new owners don't have the legal or lawful right to sell it, so they are backing he crawfords,Footloose52 wrote:Wasn't it suggested that it had sold prior to auction and that was why it was withdrawn?guilty wrote:Item 39, 3 Fearn Chase definitely wasn't sold by auction today. The auctioneers slipped another property in in it's place (Item 39A).
its plain to see
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 6:49 am
- Location: In the real world
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Bargain price for a forthcoming eviction just ask Panama Tom.exiledscouser wrote:Phuck me - who's going to be daft enough to stump up that sort of money for a wacko fringe meet of the Big Failure Club?tom Crawford wrote:Unfortunately there has to be a charge for this meeting of £ 25.00 per person, this will cover costs for the venue and printing etc no profit will be made out of it
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 2:47 pm
- Location: Manchester by day, Slaithwaite by night
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
We debated at work sending someone along. Although I'm the obvious choice, being the self-appointed FOTL expert, I know too much and might give myself away or get in an argument with a freetard and draw too much attention to myself. Plus I have a ticket for Rochdale v Wigan that day. We eventually whittled it down to a trainee solicitor but to be honest she's so gullible she'd probably sign up for the whole thing. Pity, it'd have been £25 well spent. But I'm fairly certain there'll be other moles in the crowd.Losleones wrote:Bargain price for a forthcoming eviction just ask Panama Tom.exiledscouser wrote:Phuck me - who's going to be daft enough to stump up that sort of money for a wacko fringe meet of the Big Failure Club?tom Crawford wrote:Unfortunately there has to be a charge for this meeting of £ 25.00 per person, this will cover costs for the venue and printing etc no profit will be made out of it
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:41 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Send Yiam's dog.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Soho London
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I think that's the first time I've ever seen the words "solicitor" and "gullible" appear in the same sentence.mufc1959 wrote:. We eventually whittled it down to a trainee solicitor but to be honest she's so gullible she'd probably sign up for the whole thing.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 10:33 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
send her along, and get her to say she believe tom won and wants to help him get the house back
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Indeed, my posts are so inconsequential that dozens have been deleted so outsiders, Tom, GOODF can't read them.LordEd wrote:It's probably safe to assume that in the den of government shill trolls that your super secret PMs to other secret rebel freedom fighters are subject to unreasonable search and seizure with the delicacy of a TSA full cavity examination. Papers please.
Or perhaps nobody really cares what you post in private to others.
We have to maintain the vision of perfect harmony over here.... No dissent tolerated.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
You might not believe this, but I don't give a toss what you think of me.Gregg wrote:I hardly ever type in red, so don't get my Irish up. As a hint to you, I know its hard to believe, but the 12 years this forum has been here before you popped in to make a noise was not, really wasn't, all in preparation for your eventual arrival, I know this is hard for you to fathom, but its not all about you.Joinder wrote:The moderators RED warning is well made.
I hope Quatloosians take notice of it and stop posting peoples details on line.
Just as an aside, do moderators ever read our PMs?....hmmmmmmmm?
Yes, I do read PMs, I'm not aware that you have ever sent me one.
And the moderators deliberately misreading my query about PMs tells me all I need to know.
You might want to delete this if its too painful to be on public view.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:37 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
And the obsession with a carpet fitter from Nottingham continues, and continues........
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Soho London
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
That is incorrect. Dissent is tolerated on here. Obviously you were not here when Van Pelt used to post. Flame wars are not tolerated on here. Good job too.Joinder wrote: We have to maintain the vision of perfect harmony over here.... No dissent tolerated.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: Wanstead
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Joinder, you really are boring me now. Leave your gripes behind and lets move on FFS.Joinder wrote:And the obsession with a carpet fitter from Nottingham continues, and continues........
Oh the irony of the Get Out Of Debt Free website
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Ahh! You think that a mod/s have read your pm's to someone?Joinder wrote:You might not believe this, but I don't give a toss what you think of me.Gregg wrote:I hardly ever type in red, so don't get my Irish up. As a hint to you, I know its hard to believe, but the 12 years this forum has been here before you popped in to make a noise was not, really wasn't, all in preparation for your eventual arrival, I know this is hard for you to fathom, but its not all about you.Joinder wrote:The moderators RED warning is well made.
I hope Quatloosians take notice of it and stop posting peoples details on line.
Just as an aside, do moderators ever read our PMs?....hmmmmmmmm?
Yes, I do read PMs, I'm not aware that you have ever sent me one.
And the moderators deliberately misreading my query about PMs tells me all I need to know.
You might want to delete this if its too painful to be on public view.
I have no idea if they have or haven't but maybe another explanation is that a recipient of a pm has forwarded it to a mod?
I guess you still have some sort of a beef and this is noted by me at least (so perfect harmony does not reign supreme) but IMO , life is too short to get too worked up about it - in the scheme of things, this is just an internet forum so if you can, it would be great if you could just turn the page now?
If you don't mind me asking?