Thought I’d pop in on Wally Dove and the Human Rights Defenders League In Canada to see what they’re up to. First, an administrative note – it seemed for quite some time that Kent Barrett (
http://www.facebook.com/kent.barrett) was a significant figure in that movement, but he seems now to have shifted over to Scott Duncan’s camp. Scott Is Always Right!
The HRDLC class action lawsuit (
http://humanrightsdefendersleague.ca/our-legal-action/) appears to have gone absolutely nowhere – the mysterious lawyer is still threatening “… to hand in his bar card(s) …” - but now instead of one lawsuit, Wally & Co. seem to think there might be numerous lawsuits ahead:
Civil Litigations
It is not yet entirely clear to us, exactly how many civil litigations may be required in order for us to accomplish our objectives. For example, we know that Action(s) will be required against the Federal government respecting the offence of private money ownership via the Bank Act, and the offence of privatizing of national assets via another Act or Acts, all or some of which may enjoin various Ministries. We also know we will be required in each province and territory to take Actions regarding the offence of denying private property ownership and protection of subsisting Crown Grants via the Land Titles Acts, and of course, Actions against the various Ministries, probably both provincial and federal, regarding the offence of the fraudulent creation and attachment of the registered names. All of the above institutions or agencies serve in one way or another to enact and enforce statutes and by-laws that abrogate our fundamental natural human rights, contrary to the superior laws of the nation and the international treaties.
Provincial and Federal Actions
Now concurrent with all of the above, we will be taking action against each of the various provincial and federal law societies, the BAR associations and the appropriate Ministries of Justice, as the members of these organizations are complicit with the activities of the aforementioned institutions and agencies. These court actions are designed to utilize the tools built into the system itself, to actually cause foundational and permanent change to that system, as it was originally designed to be. The result will be our freedom from the enslavement of the banker dominated money system, and to have a government that will be our servant and not our master, taking instructions from us, and not from the bankers. As Canadians, we are being [criminally] deprived of our Patrimonial Entitlements, that being our right to freely enjoy our fair share of the natural wealth and resources of our nation, and therefore we are not only entitled, but we are morally obligated to take action aimed at stopping that deprivation. That is what our process is all about.
I’m sure they’ll figure it out.
Another new feature on the website is for the HRDLC users to report their negative interactions with the CRA and banks (
http://humanrightsdefendersleague.ca/cr ... r-stories/). You see, this happens a lot:
It goes without saying that as being a transparent advocate for the people of Canada we get to hear a lot of horror stories when it comes to our dealing with government agencies like the Canada Revenue Agency and monolithic banking corporations.
The problem is that for the most part the people we can share our stories, and have them care, are few and far between. Well here at Human Rights Defenders League we want to hear your stories and with your permission we also want to share those stories with people who do care and so you can see you are not alone.
But apparently things must have greatly improved of since the HRDLC put this mechanism in place because in total there are zero of these “Horror Stories” posted to the HRDLC website. Good for you, CRA! Glad you cleaned up your act! (Or maybe no one is visiting Wally’s website …)
But, thankfully Wally & Co. have not been entirely inactive. One new focus is an outreach to Newfoundland fishermen. For those not familiar with the state of fisheries in Canada, this was a traditional mainstay of the Newfoundland economy, but in the 1980 onward a crash in fish stocks due to overfishing much reduced that activity, and led to close government management. Well, the HRDLC has produced a nifty little 17 page pamphlet (
http://humanrightsdefendersleague.ca/?ddownload=2506) that explains how fisheries legislation only applies to a person (a.k.a. the Infamous Strawman) and you can opt of having a person using the usual HRDLC techniques.
I wonder if we’ll see any litigation based on that scheme? My guess is no. HRDLC doesn’t seem to have many subscribers, and most Newfies have a little more common sense than that. With the occasional exception (
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=9593) like Amy Collins, and I think she’s quit the HRDLC too and also shifted to Scott Duncan. Seems to be a pattern here …
Last, HDRLC is offering “Provincial Letters of Complaint” (
http://humanrightsdefendersleague.ca/no ... complaint/). These are entirely new documents which you can download, personalize, and send to your local Law Society, and various Attorney Generals, who are identified like this: “a man, Sometimes acting as Attorney General of Canada”.
I’ll reproduce one (styling is in the original) for fun.
RE: NOTICE FOR CORRECTIVE OR DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
Members of the Law Society have, either wittingly or unwittingly, created a (legal) system of enslavement and theft under which the people have been beguiled into a life of slavery. We ask that you investigate and take corrective or disciplinary action as appropriate.
No Act or Statute or Governmental Policy or Guideline is written, reviewed and enforced unless done by a member of the Law Society. In other words, the legal system is created by lawyers, as is any type of governance, be it banking or political.
It is the inherent duty of government to supply the money to the people in order that they may create and freely exchange their goods and services. The government's failure to do so, is a breach of trust whether done wittingly or unwittingly. The present-day system reflects this failure.
Worse, the delegation/transfer of this duty to a private for-profit group of bankers is unconstitutional and in contempt of the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General) [1951], S.C.R. 31. This exploit has been facilitated by the members of the Law Society.
Because of this breach of trust, the people are left with no alternative but to borrow money they need from private bankers, at interest, and consequently find themselves in a permanent state of debt bondage, slavery or servitude (see Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights), and living in a permanent state of hopelessness.
In fact, the government is contributing directly to this enslavement of the people by borrowing, at interest, from these same private bankers and holding the people as surety for the national debt, through the ancient system of pledging, effected and perpetuated by the birth registration process.
To correct this situation, the government must either start supplying the money to their legal entity, the registered legal name, or accept the responsibility of paying all the financial debts and obligations under the registered legal name appearing on the said birth certificate (“BC”), the title to which is held by the government, making government the responsible party (principal).
The current system of commerce is patterned after the game of Monopoly and was created by lawyers, who write, interpret, enforce, and judge the law (Rules of the game/Acts & Statutes), on behalf of the private bankers, through government(s), to facilitate the enslavement of the people and the theft of the people's natural and created wealth.
There are two simultaneous systems at play in our country today.
The first we refer to as “fact”. This is where human beings are all created free and equal in dignity and rights under God (or whatever we may call our Creator), with dominion over the earth and all things of it (humanity's birthright).
The second is effectively a mirror image of the “fact”, and is cognizable by its fictional nature, which we refer to as the fictional system of commerce (“rule of law”). This is where human beings take on (compelled by law), or play, any number of the fictional characters that exist therein, such as person , client, Police Officer, Member of Parliament, Lawyer, Judge, etc.
When a human being attends at a lawyer's office to engage his/her legal services, it is the human being that attends but the lawyer assumes the human being is playing one or more of the aforementioned fictional characters available to him/her (person). This is the problem!
If the lawyer does not divulge the truth to the human being, that he/she is not the client, that the person/registered legal name is the client, then the lawyer has assisted in the enslavement of, and theft from, the human being. This is the distinction between “fact” and “rule of law”.
It is common knowledge, or it certainly ought to be, among lawyers, that all Acts and Statutes apply only to persons and not human beings (men and women).
Further, it is every human being's right to choose to be recognized as a person before the law, OR NOT (see Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights). Infringement of this right is Extortion (see R v. Davis, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 759).
No human being can be forced to play one of the fictional characters in the fictional system of commerce as established by lawyers for the sole purpose, we submit, of enslaving humanity and stealing all their natural and created wealth for the ultimate benefit of the private bankers, both domestic and international.
We submit, this is negligent misrepresentation of the truth to human beings for the sole purpose of bringing the human being into debt bondage as a fictional character known, in law, as a person.
The ultimate purpose of this misrepresentation is to obtain the execution of valuable securities (Court Orders for money) and placing that burden upon the human being. This is fraudulent and invokes Section 363 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
In fact, this amounts to the negligent misrepresentation of human beings as a client, as property, as debtor, and the unlawful pledging of human beings as security for the debt of another (debt bondage). It is an act committed by all lawyers including those playing the fictional character of judges in all Canadian Courts.
The registered legal name, which existence is certified by the birth certificate (“BC”), contains the names of the principals (responsible parties), CANADA and the province of birth, such as ONTARIO. Our (human beings) signatures do not appear on the “BC” and we are not, therefore, a party (principal).
The best evidence of title in the registered legal name (the Statement of Birth) is archived with the government which means, we submit, that the government is the holder of the legal title in the registered legal names and by extension, the legal owner of all property registered in those registered legal names.
Consequently, LEGALLY the people are chattel and used (hypothecated) as surety for the debt of another, the government. This is done, without the knowledge and consent of the people and is, by definition, slavery, which is a crime against humanity.
The Crown and members of the Law Society, collectively and individually, are misrepresenting the facts. This truth (“fact”) being, all legal claims and obligations requiring the payment of money are the responsibility of the issuer of the “BC” AND HOLDER OF LEGAL TITLE IN THE REGISTERED LEGAL NAME, not the human beings.
This lack of disclosure amounts to misrepresentation, malpractice, mistake, fraud, or negligence.
Respectfully, all of this results in the passing off of debt and other liabilities to human beings (men and women), and is one, if not the sole, cause of loss of enjoyment of life for humanity and damage to the public.
The violation of an Act or Statute is not a wrong committed by any human being (man or woman).
It is respectfully submitted that, because of the foregoing, amongst other things, the Law Society is guilty of dereliction of duty, and the Attorney's General are grossly negligent in the performance of their duties.
The bottom line is that men and women do not belong in this system and when they are duped or otherwise tricked into being a part of it, that makes out fraud. This requires corrective action by members of the Law Society.
Thank you for your assistance in these matters and I look forward to your response.
by, i, a man, john doe
for, Human Rights Defender (Declaration on Human Rights Defenders; UN Resolution, A/Res/53/144, 8 March 1999)
Human Rights Defenders League in Canada
[insert your address here]
Well, that correlates well with Wally's "Federal and Provincial" lawsuits mentioned above. Frankly, I'm a little confused why Wally doesn't just do this himself. All he has to do is retain a lawyer, demand legal proof of The Strawman, and when the lawyer pulls out
Meads v. Meads, 2012 ABQB 571, then Wally can file a lawsuit in negligence - or perhaps even conspiracy! Seems straight forward enough. Don't need a class action for that, nor a de-BAR-carded representative.
Hopefully that alternative will occur to Mr. Dove. In the meantime? Excelsior!
SMS Möwe
