2. If you have to quote someone learn how to do it properly.
I note it didn't take long for the corruption allegation to come out. Yes, if you've been found not guilty of something it must be because the Police were corrupt.
![Sarcasm :sarcasmon:](./images/smilies/SarcasmOn.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Looking forward to seeing that video.YiamCross wrote: Fortunately for Craig his buddy who was videoing the whole episode picked the envelope up for him.
IDIOT wrote: Any chance you can get the pdf up on here for viewing? Some of us don't use FaceBook remember.
Taken in contempt of court rules?Joinder wrote:On man, I so hope there is a video of the paper serving, I can just imagine Mark's high pitched wailing.
Yes, but I haven't asked for anything in the order which would restrict them from doing what any reasonable person would consider part of their normal life and they have been given the opportunity to defend their actions if they can. These people are, as we've seen, able to mobilise others around the country and it was important to stop the harassment as soon as possible.IDIOT wrote:Thanks.
I did think it was rather short notice to be fair, less than a week. More to come in December then...
Who cares about court rules (oops), let's see it !!ArthurWankspittle wrote:Taken in contempt of court rules?Joinder wrote:On man, I so hope there is a video of the paper serving, I can just imagine Mark's high pitched wailing.
I am currently bemused by the possible scenario of everyone involved in this fiasco getting a criminal conviction with the exception of Tom.
I had a nagging doubt. Don't anymore.Joinder wrote:I was hoping that I could keep my involvement out of the public eye,vampireLOREN wrote:You are being modest, we know it was the sound advice you gave him last week that swung it his way.Joinder wrote:Glad that he was cleared.
Ridiculous charge anyway, "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace "would have been more appropriate and likely to stick.
Oh well, its out in the open now, unless you do the decent thing and delete it ?
Having looked at all of the videos of Tom's arrest I must say I'm surprised they didn't drop the charge against him long before it cout to court and the result seems fair and reasonable based on what I know of the evidence presented. If they really wanted something serious to stick then I'd have showed the court the way he drove at the police line when he arrived. In my mind that demonstrated a clear intention to intimidate the officers standing in his path and I certainly would have jumped out of the way.Joinder wrote:.....
Ridiculous charge anyway, "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace "would have been more appropriate and likely to stick.
I've yet to see Tom being violent in any video, despite the obvious stress he is under.
They will have to be deemed 'reasonable' though. The judge won't take kindly to the pudding being over egged, so to speak.AndyPandy wrote:This is the bit I like:
5. Costs reserved to 8th December 2015, I'm presuming they won't be insubstantial!!
£45,000 any one?AndyPandy wrote:This is the bit I like:
5. Costs reserved to 8th December 2015, I'm presuming they won't be insubstantial!!