Good idea bones. What about Guy Taylor. ? Isn't he up again soon? I keep losing track of his starring roles in the courts.Bones wrote:
All we have to look forward too now is see Mark Haining and the other mentally challenged idiots going to court.
Should we have a new thread just for that now..
Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Last edited by wanglepin on Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CEYLON AT HIS BEST >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqUhR4n ... g&index=91
Hainings arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MI07tVoh0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqUhR4n ... g&index=91
Hainings arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MI07tVoh0
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: Wanstead
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I'm pretty sure that chargeable costs are set out in the CPR and from memory they are pretty low for a Litigant in Person, something like £18 per hour plus provable disbursements (travel etc).AndyPandy wrote:This is the bit I like:
5. Costs reserved to 8th December 2015, I'm presuming they won't be insubstantial!!
Oh the irony of the Get Out Of Debt Free website
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: Wanstead
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Yep £18 per hour - have a read of this article...getoutofdebtfools wrote:I'm pretty sure that chargeable costs are set out in the CPR and from memory they are pretty low for a Litigant in Person, something like £18 per hour plus provable disbursements (travel etc).AndyPandy wrote:This is the bit I like:
5. Costs reserved to 8th December 2015, I'm presuming they won't be insubstantial!!
http://www.mills-reeve.com/litigants-in ... -recovery/
Oh the irony of the Get Out Of Debt Free website
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
-
- Cannoneer
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 8:55 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Guy Taylor 10th and 11th December Hereford Crown Court
Can't wait
Can't wait
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: Wanstead
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
What's he in Court for? I presume it's not Crawford related?mac wrote:Guy Taylor 10th and 11th December Hereford Crown Court
Can't wait
Oh the irony of the Get Out Of Debt Free website
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
-
- Cannoneer
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 8:55 pm
-
- Gunners Mate
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 9:32 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I have been to the RCJ twice & won on both occasions and asked for my costs which because the other side insisted on early starts included hotel rooms & meals, train fares & could justify cab fares to & from Hotel/train station/RCJ as my OH is in a wheelchair, parking fees for having to leave the car parked securely & also replacement labour costs for someone to cover my job whilst absent. Each time they were granted without having to produce itemised costs. For a hotel I can certainly vouch for the Holiday Inn in Mayfair or any of the Radissons.getoutofdebtfools wrote:I'm pretty sure that chargeable costs are set out in the CPR and from memory they are pretty low for a Litigant in Person, something like £18 per hour plus provable disbursements (travel etc).AndyPandy wrote:This is the bit I like:
5. Costs reserved to 8th December 2015, I'm presuming they won't be insubstantial!!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Latest from TC
Justice has been served because he won, though when he loses a case it is fraud
Justice has been served because he won, though when he loses a case it is fraud
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Ab initio, that means it would void his original endowment mortgage contract, he definitely wouldn't get his former home back then.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Who was the 'stalker' that was removed from court?
Anybody seen the video that TC refers to?
And Fearn Chase sold again! Is that the 3rd time in a matter of months? It's getting a bit like pass the parcel!
My understanding is that Land Registry get a bit twitchy (as do lenders) when properties change hands in less than 6 months - something to do with fears of money lending.
I know this as it is something I want to do but my solicitor advised that I should wait 6 months, which is what I am doing at the moment.
Anybody seen the video that TC refers to?
And Fearn Chase sold again! Is that the 3rd time in a matter of months? It's getting a bit like pass the parcel!
My understanding is that Land Registry get a bit twitchy (as do lenders) when properties change hands in less than 6 months - something to do with fears of money lending.
I know this as it is something I want to do but my solicitor advised that I should wait 6 months, which is what I am doing at the moment.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
As far as I'm aware the only person removed from the court was Ceylon.Pox wrote:Who was the 'stalker' that was removed from court?
Anybody seen the video that TC refers to?
And Fearn Chase sold again! Is that the 3rd time in a matter of months? It's getting a bit like pass the parcel!
My understanding is that Land Registry get a bit twitchy (as do lenders) when properties change hands in less than 6 months - something to do with fears of money lending.
I know this as it is something I want to do but my solicitor advised that I should wait 6 months, which is what I am doing at the moment.
No one I know has seen the video, it must be just like the warrant.
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:23 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Haining was told to leave the court for his aggressive behaviour to my process server. No one else was asked to leave as far as I know.Pox wrote:Who was the 'stalker' that was removed from court?
I don't think Tom wants to publish the video, it will prove service of my papers on him and his.Pox wrote:Anybody seen the video that TC refers to?
I thought most houses were bought with borrowed money. Someone has to lend it so where would the fear be?Pox wrote:My understanding is that Land Registry get a bit twitchy (as do lenders) when properties change hands in less than 6 months - something to do with fears of money lending.
-
- Tourist to Quatloosia
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:50 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I think that's probably money launderingYiamCross wrote:I thought most houses were bought with borrowed money. Someone has to lend it so where would the fear be?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:11 pm
- Location: In a gallery, with Peanuts.
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Actually with Tom it's a little more complicated than that, Tom thinks he won the Godsmark verdict, so if this is a win like his previous 'win' he'll probably wind up serving life in solitary.letissier14 wrote:Latest from TC
Justice has been served because he won, though when he loses a case it is fraud
Anyway onto the guff that Tom wrote:
Tom claims that he had three stalkers in court, we know that one of them was Yiam and Tom probably thinks the other was the process server, so that leaves one other person. One person who was removed from court. Now Yiam's told us that person was Ceylon. So is Ceylon stalking Tom? Is that what TC is telling us?
Finally Tom says that his former house now looks like a bomb site. I'd suggest that might have something to do with the fact that a bunch of idiots clambered all over the roof. I am glad that Tom isn't going to dwell on the past, and is planning to move on, although I don't think he's going to take this advice when it comes to Fearn Chase, as he'll never allow himself to understand that his failure to repay the mortgage capital led to his eviction.
Warning may contain traces of nut
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Yes, that's what I meant - thanks.Alex C. wrote:I think that's probably money launderingYiamCross wrote:I thought most houses were bought with borrowed money. Someone has to lend it so where would the fear be?
Damned spell checker on this gizmo!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
He gives thanks to John Hurst and Peter Crol. I've seen Hurst's name on here before but who is Crol?
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Misspelling by Tom. He is Peter Croll. For crying out loud this is the guy running Dignity Alliance and another mate of Guy Taylor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9jsXr5jS4cBungle wrote:He gives thanks to John Hurst and Peter Crol. I've seen Hurst's name on here before but who is Crol?
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: Wanstead
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
It's the 2nd paragraph below that is the clincher....
Bring them on Tom (if you're allowed to) and I for one look forward to the private prosecutions, the Grand Jury and all the other laughable tosh you and your delusional friends and family think will get Fearn Chase back and get justice against those that 'stole' it
"We will keep you up todate with further Court cases to regain our home" doesn't sound like Tom is moving on to me.letissier14 wrote:Latest from TC
Bring them on Tom (if you're allowed to) and I for one look forward to the private prosecutions, the Grand Jury and all the other laughable tosh you and your delusional friends and family think will get Fearn Chase back and get justice against those that 'stole' it
Oh the irony of the Get Out Of Debt Free website
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
Now owned by a debt management company Bye bye Ceylon
-
- Captain
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 1:38 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
One of the comments on that post never fails to make me giggle when I read it.
If the police used unnecessary force does that mean the eviction was invalid?
This is the standard of the suporters. There's just no helping some of them is there?
If the police used unnecessary force does that mean the eviction was invalid?
This is the standard of the suporters. There's just no helping some of them is there?
I call it as I see it
I speak my mind
I don't hold back
I speak my mind
I don't hold back
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
They should have charged him for the stunt with the car frankly.