Chaos wrote:Burnaby49 wrote:Rob says that he did make a complaint to the Burnaby RCMP about me!
Chaos, that's just not being helpful. Rob has said;
What you can sense is the mean spirited, hatefulness and spiritual negativity. The absolute banality of all they have to say. The abusive uncharitableness, and sheer hostility. It is all based upon assumptions, unsupported by facts. There is a certain level of arrogance and hubris, full of judgment.
And I'm sure it is in response to things like your picture. Well I'm going to try and make amends. Rob's case is clearly floundering. We started out with a criminal investigation against me as a result of Rob making a formal complaint to the police. He had the RCMP on the case and my arrest was imminent in the new year. Now we're down to the RCMP telling him to get lost and a possibility that maybe, just maybe, he'll wander down to the local Gendarmes sometime or other next year and complain about me being mean to him. But if the criminal route is a dead end what about the civil route? Rob doesn't even need that mythical lawyer at the barbeque or the two lawyers he discussed my case with. He has the best legal advice in Canada at his fingertips. Literally. His own writings! He can use the Notary Protest technique he wrote about in his book "Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception" at pages 19-20:
The Notary is likely one of the most powerful cards in the judicial deck. He’s the Joker. As an Officer of the Court, he can fulfill any duty found in any statute. He has the power to attest, operate on your behalf, protest commercial documents and create administrative judgments. Here in a nutshell is what is known as the Notary Public Protest Method. ... It is based primarily on the concept of being honourable, avoiding conflict and agreeing with your potential adversary.
Step 1: You send them a letter by registered mail. In it you mention the rule of law and invite them to discuss. You are in fact extending an offer. Unless they accept your offer, they are going into dishonour.
Step 2: Three days later, you go to your Notary Public with your offer to discuss that your adversary either rejected or ignored and you have the Notary send it again, acting in his capacity of an Officer of the Court. If they again dishonour it, they have dishonoured an Officer of the Court.
Step 3: Three days after they dishonour the Notary, you have him send them a Notice of Dishonour. They are informed of their dishonour and given a chance to correct it. Again, they have three days. If they do nothing, go to step 4.
Step 4: Three days after they received the Notice of Dishonour, if they have not responded honourably, you have the Notary send a Notice of Protest. This is end game, for you have proof that you are in honour and they are not. They have lost the right to claim any conflict and they have no right to enter into negotiations. They have essentially lost. Their hands are dirty and your are not. Now you go to Step 5.
Step 5: Take your Notice of Protest and bring it to a Justice of the Peace and have an Administrative Judgment entered against your adversary. Begin collection proceedings against them as you would for any court judgment.
All Rob has to do is send me a letter. Hell, he doesn't even have to do that - he can just log onto Quatloos and post a message here to start the Notary Public Protest Method going. Heck, he can demand I pay him One Hundred Billion Dollars by that procedure ... so why not do that Rob? It worked for Adam Boisjoli! Well right until he got hit with that vexatious litigant order. But until then he was doing great!
While it is difficult to deliver a letter to me directly (anonymous coward that I am) you could, alternatively, send Ron Usher a notorial protest ordering him to deliver a letter to me and, if he doesn't comply, hit him for a hundred billion too. However a word of warning about Ron. He is legal counsel for the Society of Notaries Public of British Columbia and, in that role, he's had extensive dealings with freeman types. A number of them, I assume following your advice, have hit him with notorial protests and unilateral contracts. He says he has a pile of them probably totaling hundreds of millions of dollars that he now owes and he hasn't paid a single one. So if you nail him with one be forewarned it will just go to the back of a very long line.
If you are concerned that the notirial protest method will just end up with you dealing with a pair of deadbeats I have another suggestion right from your writings. Why not just set up your own court? In "With Lawful Excuse" you wrote at page 143:
I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
You don't even need the police! You can run your own court and savage the meanies who call you names, send you letters, or otherwise infringe on your "properly claimed and established rights and freedoms." You can do things directly without depending on police officers who are no doubt unreliable stooges of the state and cabal.
And none of this is "based upon assumptions, unsupported by facts". It's all solidly supported by your writings. What's more factual than that?
