Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Is anybody from here going to attend the hearing?
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
l
Last edited by Crawfrauds on Tue Jan 05, 2016 8:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
My bloody head hurts trying to decipher what you are saying.Crawfrauds wrote:Wow that's what this shit holeArthurWankspittle wrote:If it is someone is taking it seriously.
Look like I m gonna be here in 3 days giving it large ones in zeeee clown court
So u all on Tuesday 10 o'clock sharp at Leicester Clown Court Be there or be square!!!
Bring your best jesters outfit Coz this is gonna be one hell of a show I feel for the prosecutor I think this is gonna finish his career of......... Please the ones representing yourselves don't make me laugh in court as once I start I can't stop lol-bradley
Lets do this!! Here ane interested to see justice be done.
The CPS ARE CRAZY!!!-craig
these are not
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Serves you right for even tryingBungle wrote:My bloody head hurts trying to decipher what you are saying.Crawfrauds wrote:
Wow that's what this shit hole
Look like I m gonna be here in 3 days giving it large ones in zeeee clown court
So u all on Tuesday 10 o'clock sharp at Leicester Clown Court Be there or be square!!!
Bring your best jesters outfit Coz this is gonna be one hell of a show I feel for the prosecutor I think this is gonna finish his career of......... Please the ones representing yourselves don't make me laugh in court as once I start I can't stop lol-bradley
Lets do this!! Here ane interested to see justice be done.
The CPS ARE CRAZY!!!-craig
these are not
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
For Tria
Last edited by Crawfrauds on Tue Jan 05, 2016 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
All that I will say is that your signature with the disgusting word cxxts is far from being acceptable. I really ought to ignore you.Crawfrauds wrote:For Tria
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
wankspittle, seeing as though you like moderating so much, could you take down all posts with pictures/videos of me on quatloos, that are illegal and unlawfull or do i need to obtain a court order. I will only say this, the court of appeal affirmed its illegal in 2001. Now delete my account and posts or tell me how to and the afforemention
Last edited by Crawfrauds on Tue Jan 05, 2016 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:23 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
I was hoping for some kind of report from the courts, difficult to understand as it might be, but I don't think that's looking very likely. In fact I can see the mods having a not too lengthy discussion before booting someone out. I don't even know what we've done to upset crawfrauds, seems unlikely we'll ever find out.
I have heard that both Haining and Craig's moves to have their cases dismissed have failed but that's not really from the horse's mouth. Seems likely to be true, though.
I have heard that both Haining and Craig's moves to have their cases dismissed have failed but that's not really from the horse's mouth. Seems likely to be true, though.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
please doBungle wrote:All that I will say is that your signature with the disgusting word cxxts is far from being acceptable. I really ought to ignore you.Crawfrauds wrote:For Tria
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
From what I understand you are correct and due to the evidence neither application stood much of a chanceYiamCross wrote: I have heard that both Haining and Craig's moves to have their cases dismissed have failed but that's not really from the horse's mouth. Seems likely to be true, though.
Last edited by Bones on Tue Jan 05, 2016 8:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
YiamCross wrote:I was hoping for some kind of report from the courts, difficult to understand as it might be, but I don't think that's looking very likely. In fact I can see the mods having a not too lengthy discussion before booting someone out. I don't even know what we've done to upset crawfrauds, seems unlikely we'll ever find out.
I have heard that both Haining and Craig's moves to have their cases dismissed have failed but that's not really from the horse's mouth. Seems likely to be true, though.
most people are not interested so why bother. My first one went down well
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Crawfrauds wrote: please do
-
- Banned (Permanently)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
A no case to answer argument should be made after all the evidence has been heard. QC told me thatBones wrote:From what I understand you are correct and due to the evidence never application stood much of a chanceYiamCross wrote: I have heard that both Haining and Craig's moves to have their cases dismissed have failed but that's not really from the horse's mouth. Seems likely to be true, though.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Wasn't you there ? Didn't you see what occurred ?
Do you think that Freeman / Sovcit's follow procedure and protocol's ?
They are supposed to have waited until the prosecution's case had been concluded. However, rumour has it they tried to jump the gun. I am not sure if that is because any of them have to be back in Nottingham with in two weeks to sign on again or something.
I am sure your Q.C buddy would have advised you that when there is such irrefutable evidence of a crime, such as photo's of certain people committing said crime, then a no case to answer application would most likely be unsuccessful
* the above is pure speculation
Do you think that Freeman / Sovcit's follow procedure and protocol's ?
They are supposed to have waited until the prosecution's case had been concluded. However, rumour has it they tried to jump the gun. I am not sure if that is because any of them have to be back in Nottingham with in two weeks to sign on again or something.
I am sure your Q.C buddy would have advised you that when there is such irrefutable evidence of a crime, such as photo's of certain people committing said crime, then a no case to answer application would most likely be unsuccessful
* the above is pure speculation
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8246
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
His signature has been removed and he has lost signature privileges.Crawfrauds wrote:please doBungle wrote:All that I will say is that your signature with the disgusting word cxxts is far from being acceptable. I really ought to ignore you.Crawfrauds wrote:For Tria
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
And has been given a timeout so that he can choose between sitting in the corner facing the wall and behaving.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Oh dear. I get this on another site I am a regular on, they even have their own memes for it. So, please point out which posts contain videos or pictures of you, what basis you are claiming they are illegal and why you will be getting a court order. Then be aware that this site is owned, and I think hosted, in the US. I understand you will be waiting several days in order to reply to this post, but I will remind you about it in due time.Crawfrauds wrote:wankspittle, seeing as though you like moderating so much, could you take down all posts with pictures/videos of me on quatloos, that are illegal and unlawfull or do i need to obtain a court order. I will only say this, the court of appeal affirmed its illegal in 2001. Now delete my account and posts or tell me how to and the afforemention
Alternatively, due to the possibly misinterpretation of you post, I offer the following:
Done..... take down all posts with pictures/videos of me on quatloos, that are illegal and unlawfull ....
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
And now, hopefully, we can go back to literate, factual reports of court hearing we may be interested in.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
Jay Bradley posted this on BTBATB Facebook page a short while ago:
Jay Brad Bradley with Rick Rolls and 5 others.
That was an interesting day 1 let's see what happens tomorrow, due to the case being ongoing we are not allowed to discuss on the Internet the case so we will fill you all in as soon as we can we are discussing with family and friends so if you know them ask them but it looks good at the minute and please that is my point of view no one else's
Thanks everyone who has supported us all and asked about us and posted today thanks much love
To my homies now we can tag each other I thought I would tag u all see ya tomorrow 10.30 sharp
Jay Brad Bradley with Rick Rolls and 5 others.
That was an interesting day 1 let's see what happens tomorrow, due to the case being ongoing we are not allowed to discuss on the Internet the case so we will fill you all in as soon as we can we are discussing with family and friends so if you know them ask them but it looks good at the minute and please that is my point of view no one else's
Thanks everyone who has supported us all and asked about us and posted today thanks much love
To my homies now we can tag each other I thought I would tag u all see ya tomorrow 10.30 sharp
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 1:38 am
Re: Tom Crawford failed judgment 3/9/15 Part 1 & 2
It seems that now the case has begun the defendants can now interact with each other but should continue to refrain from talking about the case either between themselves or with others.
With only two of them being represented I so wish at times like this there was some way we could purchase video, not just the transcript, of the proceedings. I do love a good comedy.
With only two of them being represented I so wish at times like this there was some way we could purchase video, not just the transcript, of the proceedings. I do love a good comedy.
I call it as I see it
I speak my mind
I don't hold back
I speak my mind
I don't hold back