Robert Arthur Menard FOTL (Freeman on the Lam)

[wanglepin]

We Spoke to a Leader in the Freemen on the Land Movement About the Oregon Standoff

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/we-spoke ... n-standoff

he educates followers with videos and (free) books that he puts out

Are these not books then?
http://shop.worldfreemansociety.org/ind ... ucts_id=48
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ThinkFREE

[arayder]

We Spoke to a Leader in the Freemen on the Land Movement About the Oregon Standoff

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/we-spoke ... n-standoff

Daily VICE Canada: Freemen On The Land, Canada-Saudi Arms Deal, She-Devils

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhIKVYLkp44

Menard says one thing to the media and another to his freeman sycophants:

I believe we're labelled as "anti-government," but I would say it's more accurate to say we're pro-good-government. We believe in equality and personal responsibility, and as such, we believe that no one has the right to govern their fellow man without the consent of the governing.

Robert Menard says to freemen:

[S]tatutes which governments call laws, are all the laws of the society. . . Leave society, and these rules are no longer your laws. Those remaining behind will still have to obey them, you will not. . . .our society was a house party. . .

http://api.ning.com/files/c3yyoaj2Q7PnZ ... ToKnow.pdf

. . . our revolution, if it happened, to be far more peaceful and would likely be using courts and using the laws to and reclaiming our rights and the rights our forefathers had. I certainly hope that it doesn't happen. Who wants to see violent revolution? Certainly not me.

Robert Menard says to freemen:

"We have guys with guns too. . .and if it comes to a point then that's what we are going to have to do. . ."

At 1:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkEDOuH8fzg

Bobby says whatever he needs to whomever he needs to say it.

[LordEd]

Went to check on Rob's free reign to post unhindered by things like opposition or facts and see he's posted nothing.

And good old warrantcard is prosecuting thought crime

YOU HAVENT BEEN BANNED BECAUSE YOU HAVENT BROKEN THE TERMS OR LIKELY TO WC
YOU

Love it when freemen sites do stuff like that. Great irony.

[Burnaby49]

I've been humiliated, slighted and abused by Rob. I thought that I was special, that I meant something to him, that his threats to have the RCMP hunt me down and arrest me showed that we had something unique and precious between us. But it turns out to be all a big lie. I'm just one of many that he's made that promise to and then broken. I feel betrayed.

I was researching somebody else entirely for a new discussion I plan to start and I ran across this posting by Rob from 2008;

Freeman-on-the-Land (OP)
User ID: 364317
Canada
03/04/2008 11:46 PM

Re: Notice of Understanding and Intent
SHAMELESS OP BUMP.

Would love to hear from the coward who threatened me, as I will be presenting an information leading to a charge against him, as his actions are a breach of the criminal code and not supported by his so called constitution.

Applicable section of the criminal code is Section 264.1 it states:

Criminal Code
PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION
Assaults

Uttering threats

264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat

(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;
(b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or
(c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.

Punishment

(2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.

Idem

(3) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b) or (c)

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 38; 1994, c. 44, s. 16.

Read it here:
[link to http://www.canlii.org]

Can you show where the offence of assault is limited so it is not applicable to those who act like you, by that I mean a childish and ignorant coward?

Bet you can't. What you should know is I have spent considerable energy establishing a line of communications with peace officers, so I can educate them without conflict and direct them to protect me as peace officers.

You broke the law, I did not.

Your unlawful threats will be made known to some peace officers. Your breach of the criminal code will be pointed out. Demands under the criminal code will be made against them. Failure on their part will result in them facing charges. They will act on my claim, as they have no choice, unless they want to face charges themselves. Bear in mind, the one I intend to speak to knows me well, and although we may have different political views, when it comes to peace and law, we are on the same side, and I spent a lot of time helping him understand what I know of the law.

In Canada, we do not threaten physical violence due only to a difference in political views. They will frown on that in a very serious way.

You will be visited by members of my lawful forces. You may know them as RCMP. They will have a little chat with you and if they feel the need to do so to protect justice and preserve the peace, they will charge you under the criminal code.

Looking forward to seeing your cowardly face in court.
Rob

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... sclaimer=1

I thought it was my cowardly face he looked forward to seeing in court but it turns out that I'm just his latest plaything and he was making identical threats to others years ago.

If the RCMP are nothing more than Rob's own "lawful forces" then why did the Burnaby RCMP tell him to get lost when he phoned them to arrest me? Or was that just a lie too and I mean so little to him that he couldn't even be bothered to call them? I just don't know where I stand with Rob any more. How many others has he promiscuously promised to have charged and arrested and then just abandoned without even a goodbye threat?

[LordEd]

I remember him posting somebody's house during the great jargon buster wars and somewhat suggested harm towards it.

And of course the d'rok lawsuit that went nowhere other than threatening a random person

[arayder]

I remember him posting somebody's house during the great jargon buster wars and somewhat suggested harm towards it.

And of course the d'rok lawsuit that went nowhere other than threatening a random person

Bobby's lack of effective carry through is not limited to his projects.

Went to check on Rob's free reign to post unhindered by things like opposition or facts and see he's posted nothing.

And good old warrantcard is prosecuting thought crime

YOU HAVENT BEEN BANNED BECAUSE YOU HAVENT BROKEN THE TERMS OR LIKELY TO WC
YOU

Love it when freemen sites do stuff like that. Great irony.

It is a possibility that Bobby's leashed dog is harvesting IP addresses. I go to TPUC with a proxy server lest Menard gets another investigation wrong and ends up unleashing the wrath of Bobby on somebody he thinks is me.

----------------
Dope Clock III
It has been 22 days since Robert Menard promised to turn Burnaby49 over to the RMCP and the courts for criminal prosecution. So far nothing has happen.

[wanglepin]

Went to check on Rob's free reign to post unhindered by things like opposition or facts and see he's posted nothing.

And good old warrantcard is prosecuting thought crime

YOU HAVENT BEEN BANNED BECAUSE YOU HAVENT BROKEN THE TERMS OR LIKELY TO WC
YOU

Love it when freemen sites do stuff like that. Great irony.

Love it when freemen sites do stuff like that. Great irony.
Interesting that the retard Warrantcard says that to this particular new poster. He must know him to suggest he is “unlikely to”.
This particular new poster MrKnowone seems antagonistic and unbalanced, but the sycophant arse licker WARRANTCARD appears to overlooking his behaviour after all the new rules, with definitions to boot, have been laid down.

MrKnowone asking about affidavits
http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2111

MrKnowone telling then he has been convicted locked up for terrorism for being a “leading freeman on the land”. (Which he denied being) and will be publishing book about his experiences.
http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php ... 2&start=10

MrKnowone telling them how much he loved John Harris and was “investigating Harris` death because of the “suspicious circumstances” and would be publishing a book about it.
http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1923

Yes this new poster MrKnowone seems to be able to do and say what he likes while one poster over there is being warned by our arse licker warrant card not to argue when she is not even arguing.
http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2150
While Menard, though he has not posted of late seems to have the run of the shop.

[arayder]

MrKnowone telling then he has been convicted locked up for terrorism for being a “leading freeman on the land”. (Which he denied being) and will be publishing book about his experiences.

. . . was “investigating Harris` death because of the “suspicious circumstances” and would be publishing a book about it.

Victimhood is the new competency in freemandia.

[notorial dissent]

Victimhood is the new competency in freemandia.

Well, when it is all you have, you go with your strengths.

[Wake Up! Productions]

I've been humiliated, slighted and abused by Rob.

Menard is at it again ... https://www.facebook.com/robert.menard. ... 3091820436

To Ron Usher
rusher@society.notaries.bc.ca
778-327-6386
General Counsel,
The Society of Notaries Public of BC
Monday, January 11, 2016
Hello and good day. I am contacting you hoping to secure certain information identifying someone whom you know, and who is engaged in a very concerning non-stop campaign of defamation and harassment against me. He is known to me as BURNABY49.

It goes on for miles, so I won't post it all here.

[Burnaby49]

Perhaps Menard should go back through this discussion and check about his address being posted online. I didn't do it. But Rob, don't let facts get in the way of a good story.

[Burnaby49]

Wow, he does go on forever!

[Wake Up! Productions]

Wow, he does go on forever!

FACEBOOK:

Robert Menard
Thank you Jay. One of my cyber-stalkers Steve Bates has already posted this to the quatloos forum. Took him less than five minutes. Shows how much he besets my facebook page!

Since I am BLOCKED by Menard on FB, I'll answer him here. I just happened to check your page Rob. First time in 3 days. But now that Dean Clifford is gone to the Big House, you should know that it frees up more time to focus on you !!!

[Burnaby49]

Over at Face Book menard is using this posting of mine to show that I outed his address online;

This is the house;

http://duproprio.com/home-for-sale-st-j ... -en-478481

Check the interior pictures against Menard's recent video locations. He did all but one in the kitchen. The video I link to in my signature was taken at the foot of the stairs.

This is the text of the letter I sent him on June 17th. After that phone rant he made to Ron Usher I just wanted to let him know that I knew where he was. The reference to squirrels is from one of his Facebook postings where he said he had squirrels running around the yard.

Hi Rob! Just a quick hello from Burnaby49!

Glad to see you landed on your feet in such a nice spot. I had squirrels running across my yard today too. Summer at last!

I don't want to take too much of your busy time that could be better employed working on all those videos you're busy churning out. Just one very minor critical comment. The sink and those cabinets are getting a little bit stale as a backdrop. Why not turn the camera around to the "Corner Bar" blackboard and use that for your next presentation?

37 BOUL SAINT-LUC,
SAINT-JEAN-SUR-RICHELIEU QC
J2W 1E3

viewtopic.php?f=48&t=10492&start=800#p201831

What he neglects to mention that it was Wake Up! Production who identified his house online in this previous posting;

I HAVE FOUND ROBERT MENARD !!!

Based on the video that Menard uploaded yesterday https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG0X3ErdSHQ I took certain land markers and went to Google Maps. The only usable point of reference was the store next do, which features a giant "GoPro" (camera) sign. We all knew Menard was somewhere in Montreal. So I simply googled all of the GoPro authorized dealers in Montreal, and bada-bing, bada-boom.



In the video Menard's ninjagoat was in this vacant lot, and he was in the yard of the house next door.



I can only assume that this is where Menard currently lives. The address is 41 Boulevard St Luc Montreal. The easiest way to find it is to visit the site for the shop next door, http://www.lordphoto.ca/ scrool to the bottom. There is a google map, just click on it, then hit Streetview !!!

viewtopic.php?f=48&t=10492&start=800#p201810

Once Steve did that I just confirmed it. Steve got the address off by one but the house was correctly identified.

[Wake Up! Productions]

I can verify that what Burnaby is saying is the truth.

So the question now Rob is, are you going to drop your crusade against Burnaby and sue me?

[arayder]

I've been humiliated, slighted and abused by Rob.

Menard is at it again ... https://www.facebook.com/robert.menard. ... 3091820436

To Ron Usher
rusher@society.notaries.bc.ca
778-327-6386
General Counsel,
The Society of Notaries Public of BC
Monday, January 11, 2016
Hello and good day. I am contacting you hoping to secure certain information identifying someone whom you know, and who is engaged in a very concerning non-stop campaign of defamation and harassment against me. He is known to me as BURNABY49.

Like I said victimhood is the new competency in freemandia.

Since Bobby can't get diddily done in the real world he childishly opines that checking his facebook page, replying to him on forums and sending him harmless letters is a coordinated campaign of illegal harassment.

It's just more Menard ado about nothing.

----------------
Dope Clock III
It has been 22 days since Robert Menard promised to turn Burnaby49 over to the RMCP and the courts for criminal prosecution. So far nothing has happen.

[bmxninja357]

the reasonable expectation of privacy threshold diminishes greatly for public figures. for example if you are a movie star, politician, or other celebrity. rob may be disliked by most here, but aside from many things i do not agree with i consider him a friend. that being said he has made himself a public figure making movies, doing shows, magazine interviews, and several other public appearances that mean his expectation of privacy is at an extremely low threshold. if privacy was a concern he would try much harder to remain reclusive and not make public all that he does. this also includes ones actions. for example im not going to get sued for posting a picture of tom cruises house and yelling tom cruise is an ass douche at a movie. he would have no case due to being a public figure. no matter how often i did it.

im reclusive so i have no facebook at all. i only post vagaries of my location. to find me i have to tell you where i am. if you knew where i was and posted it i would have a greater expectation of privacy. im not a celebrity of any type.

and thats why there is no case here.

peace,
ninj

[Jeffrey]

So Menard has time to try and track down anonymous critics but doesn't have time to appeal his federal case. You know the clock is running on that, I'm not going to bother looking it up, but I"m certain there's a time limit to how long you can wait before filing an appeal. I'm glad he has his priorities in order.

Why chase down your anonymous critics anyways Rob? Plenty of your critics are open about their identity, hell you got Bates full name and work address.

Or is Rob trying to prove some vast government conspiracy? Of the Menard critics I know, none work for the government, there's the strip club DJ, a math tutor, a pharmacy student, a dude that works in retail. The demographics of your critics are largely the same as the demographics of your victims.

If your little crusade is against statutes, then your targets need to be the Parliament that writes and enacts those statutes, the cops that enforce them, and the judges that interpret and apply them. Getting mad at us for noticing that you haven't made any progress in your war against the government in 16 years just shows how half-assed your efforts have been.

[Burnaby49]

Actually, thinking it over, I don't think that either Steve or I first revealed Rob's address on the internet. Rob did it himself. I'm guessing that, legally, Rob voluntarily relinquished any right to privacy regarding his address when he posted that NinjaGoat video. There were enough visual indications on the video to easily determine where it was located and that is what Steve did.

[Burnaby49]

So Menard has time to try and track down anonymous critics but doesn't have time to appeal his federal case. You know the clock is running on that, I'm not going to bother looking it up, but I"m certain there's a time limit to how long you can wait before filing an appeal. I'm glad he has his priorities in order.

The appeal period expired long ago.

(2) An appeal under this section shall be brought by filing a notice of appeal in the Registry of the Federal Court of Appeal

(a) in the case of an interlocutory judgment, within 10 days after the pronouncement of the judgment or within any further time that a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal may fix or allow before or after the end of those 10 days; and
(b) in any other case, within 30 days, not including any days in July and August, after the pronouncement of the judgment or determination appealed from or within any further time that a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal may fix or allow before or after the end of those 30 days.