Ed and Elaine Brown's new Myspace page

[Dezcad]

I do like the new Ed and Elaine Brown Myspace page:

http://www.myspace.com/time2makeastand

[Cpt Banjo]

Not to be too picky, but the Code really got its authority from both Article I, Section 8 and the 16th Amendment. Let's not forget that income taxes on wages and personal earnings have never had to be apportioned, and that relying solely upon the 16th allows the crackpots to argue that it was never ratified or that all one needs to do to prevent Congress from levying income taxes is to repeal the 16th.

[ErsatzAnatchist]

That is brilliant. I hope Reno and the rest of the "Too Much Jail Time Crew" get a chance to see it from prison.

[Lambkin]

I do like the new Ed and Elaine Brown Myspace page:

http://www.myspace.com/time2makeastand

It's got to be a fake, everyone knows the tax code is a woman.

[webhick]

I do like the new Ed and Elaine Brown Myspace page:

http://www.myspace.com/time2makeastand

It's got to be a fake, everyone knows the tax code is a woman.

Yeah, I did a movie with her back in '78. The movie itself is not available to the general public, but if you have a copy of Illuminati Gone Wild you can see her elbow (or at least I think it's an elbow) at the 20m44s mark. She also did a guest spot on The Illuminati Chronicles which aired on SciFi after the Dresden Files. Sadly, both shows are in permanent hiatus.

[Truthstalker]

everyone knows the tax code is a woman.

In that case, I guess we all know what we can do with the tax code.

[Imalawman]

The movie itself is not available to the general public, but if you have a copy of Illuminati Gone Wild you can see her elbow

That was an elbow? Boy do I feel stupid. I'll say this, that's one sexy elbow.

everyone knows the tax code is a woman.

In that case, I guess we all know what we can do with the tax code.

Been there, done that. They say a Gentlemen never tells about his exploits with a lady. But I'm not a Gentlemen and she ain't no lady. All woman? oh yes. Genteel Lady? hardly.

[Demosthenes]

I do like the new Ed and Elaine Brown Myspace page:

http://www.myspace.com/time2makeastand

It's got to be a fake, everyone knows the tax code is a woman.

As in She Who Must Be Obeyed?

[Truthstalker]

As in She Who Must Be Obeyed?

Yeah, if we could only figure out exactly what the hell it is she wants.

[Demosthenes]

As in She Who Must Be Obeyed?

Yeah, if we could only figure out exactly what the hell it is she wants.

If she has to tell you, then you'll never understand...

[webhick]

As in She Who Must Be Obeyed?

Yeah, if we could only figure out exactly what the hell it is she wants.

She wants a man who doesn't need a road map for the female anatomy. Or a B.O.B. Actually, she doesn't really want the first one because men are all about cuddling, or caring, or being clingy or some crap...she wasn't really listening...

[grixit]

I'm guessing the phrase "blue box" is in there somewhere.

[Demosthenes]

Blue box with shiny things inside.

Please get it right.

[TMoore]

You know that was illegal, muthafuckers?

Seriously. Malicious hacking isn't smiled upon.

[Demosthenes]

How are you doing Mr.Moore? Welcome back.

Please provide any evidence whatsoever that any hacking or illegal activity took place.

[Nikki]

You know that was illegal, muthafuckers?

Seriously. Malicious hacking isn't smiled upon.

Nice way to jump in, potty-mouth.

Please explain how setting up an internet site with a similar name constitutes hacking. Was E&E's personal MySpace page touched? Ws it even parodied?

Perhaps you should get your facts straight before you start casting aspersions. Never mind, doing that requires a level of intelligence higher that that of you plus three of your best friends.

[Evil Squirrel Overlord]

I read "mutha" as "Mothra", makes it seem even more ominous.

Take down the website or face the threat of Japanese movie monster!

[Colonel_Buck]

Let's not forget that income taxes on wages and personal earnings have never had to be apportioned,

For those of us who have an IQ of 47 and who are not lawyers, would you mind going into a little more detail on the above? TIA.

[Moebius_Dick]

Let's not forget that income taxes on wages and personal earnings have never had to be apportioned,

For those of us who have an IQ of 47 and who are not lawyers, would you mind going into a little more detail on the above? TIA.

"the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation, but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged, and being placed [240 U.S. 103, 113] in the category of direct taxation subject to apportionment by a consideration of the sources from which the income was derived,-that is, by testing the tax not by what it was, a tax on income, but by a mistaken theory deduced from the origin or source of the income taxed"

-Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.

Taxes on income are indirect, but the Courts decided that you could view the source of the income (in the primary case, property), and make it effectively a direct tax on property ownership.

The 16th removed that analysis....but it was only necessary because of the "mistaken" determination by the Supreme Court, and then only necessary for those "sources" of income which would be indirectly directly taxed, so to speak.

[Demosthenes]

Welcome to Quatloos, Moebius ... um ... Richard.