Imagine my surprise when I visited "that site" and found the begging masthead gone and "Freewill is back! there instead.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Freewill Pollitical Prisoner / P.O.W. finally released!
I will be putting together an article and publishing it within the next few days. Just trying to get back to something resembling normal.
Wanted to let you all know I am finally back!
Posted by Freewill at 11:33 PM
17 comments:
Anonymous January 13, 2016 at 11:35 PM
The vanguards of babylon can hold no man prisoner except the willing. True story.
Anonymous January 13, 2016 at 11:52 PM
Thank God for his release! I can't even imagine what he and his family have gone through! SO glad to here he is out of that rat trap ~ Each day since I heard the terrible news I've waited for news of his release. Never thought it would be this long. Many prayers where at work... took some time but your now free.
Teepee January 14, 2016 at 12:13 AM
Your post has made my day!!!! I can't wait to read your article!!! Relax and enjoy your family & home & freedom....we can wait. I always felt your release would be close to the time the Republic is restored & announced. Perhaps your freedom is also our freedom also. God Bless you and your family and the other inmates waiting to be freed.
Seeker January 14, 2016 at 12:28 AM
Great News! So happy to hear! Welcome back Freewill! We missed you!
Anonymous January 14, 2016 at 12:55 AM
Freewill,
This is great!
Be Blessed.
big man January 14, 2016 at 1:12 AM
Great to have you back Freewill!!! You are truly a freedom fighter standing for what is right and just. May our Creator bless you and yours with a deep and everlasting peace.
Anonymous January 14, 2016 at 1:37 AM
this one for you Freewill; "you can take my body but you can not take my SOUL". the man is back!. GOD is with bud, wellcome back.
marie January 14, 2016 at 2:14 AM
Very good!!!!!!!!
Fostr January 14, 2016 at 2:19 AM
Great News!
Anonymous January 14, 2016 at 2:54 AM
This news is excellent!
tomorrow, this old rock n' roller is going
to let her inner 'Tina Turner' out
and be singing 'Proud Mary' real loud!
For what you've done and gone through,
"You're Simply The Best!"
TUG January 14, 2016 at 3:00 AM
Great!
Worth mentioning the non relenting Nesara News Network publishing.
Thanks John MacHaffie & Co!
Anonymous January 14, 2016 at 6:55 AM
Fantastic! Congratulations! I'm so happy for you and your family.
redones January 14, 2016 at 7:48 AM
GOD BE PRAISED --- JUST RELAX AND ENJOY ---- TO ALL THE OTHER POLITICAL PRISONERS JUST STAY STRONG AND HANG IN THERE
change_is_comming_are_you_ready? January 14, 2016 at 8:54 AM
awesome! welcome back!
Anonymous January 14, 2016 at 9:05 AM
Welcome HOME "FREEWILL".....I'm sure it is nice to sleep in your own bed, drink from our own coffee cup.. eat some good food...and enjoy your family and friends.. EVERYONE HAS MISSED YOU !! Perhaps you are JUST in time for this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... mtw8pbTnNg
Please listen to ALL of it.. This has NOT been posted yet...
Hugs for YOU - Freewill !!
Your Pensacola Friend.
slaveman January 14, 2016 at 9:56 AM
Welcome back, Freewill. Anxious to hear the 'whole story' of your 'stand' and your subsequent kidnapping. For now,... enjoy being re-united with your family. Thank you for your patriotism.
Anonymous January 14, 2016 at 6:32 PM
What were the charges?
"Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Moderator: Deep Knight
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
"Follow the Money"
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Too bad, I loved the friendly Canadian ladies I met in Climax, Saskatchewan, and the town's welcome sign that said "Please come again" as I was leaving.Burnaby49 wrote:All we Canadians know that. I've been there. The name is a con. If they sell dildos I never saw one.Deep Knight wrote:It turns out there's a town of Dildo. No foolin'.
But Canada has nothing on their southern neighbors, American Exceptionalism is alive and well in Ol' Kentucky.
If a free man was available, why would any utopians need dildos?Chaos wrote:this would probably be true if any of the quitters ever followed through on their freeman utopias.
"Follow the Money"
-
Jeffrey
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Spoiler, Mr. Payne posted bond on the 14th.
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Freewill may have posted bond yesterday or the day before, but he posted this today, in response to the last comment, "What were the charges?"
Freewill January 15, 2016 at 6:23 AM
You can charge a battery or an account, you cannot charge the living. You can only accuse the living.
They violated my Apostile/Act of State and ignored a challenge of jurisdiction.
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.
Freewill January 15, 2016 at 6:23 AM
You can charge a battery or an account, you cannot charge the living. You can only accuse the living.
They violated my Apostile/Act of State and ignored a challenge of jurisdiction.
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.
Others say "Apostille" is the correct spelling. But whichever, it's not one of these:State of Texas wrote:Question:
What is an Apostile and when is it required?
Answer:
An Apostile is a birth/death record that is prepared to present in a foreign country. First, obtain a certified copy of the record giving the reason for the request as "Apostile". Then the certified document must be submitted to the Texas Secretary of State with the required fee.
"Follow the Money"
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Deep Knight doesn't just talk the talk, he mails the mail. That's right, yesterday I actually sent Freewill a picture of a pink personal vibrator with rhinestones (ouch!). It was not pornographic in any way (the design did not try to suggest the "real thing"), but it was next to its box which noted it was a "small" and only 5 inches long. 
This took a lot of Google searching (and a bit of explaining to the wife when she looked over my shoulder), but it was worth getting a picture that sent the right message. Instead of signing it, I added a picture of Captain Dildo from the town of the same name, and put "Captain Dildo RCMP (ret)" on the return address (the rest was the PO Box of a friend who lives in the mountains and told me he'll pass along any response). At the bottom I also put "Formam autem consequitur functio," which he might think is some sort of legalese, but translates to "form follows function." I doubt he'll get the joke, but you never know.
Don't send anything that actually looks anatomically correct
or harassing, that might be illegal, but I urge you all to send something silly along to this poor released prisoner of war to brighten his day. Especially those of you who waded through the first 50 pages of his 250-page court-clogging filing like I did (ouch again!).
This took a lot of Google searching (and a bit of explaining to the wife when she looked over my shoulder), but it was worth getting a picture that sent the right message. Instead of signing it, I added a picture of Captain Dildo from the town of the same name, and put "Captain Dildo RCMP (ret)" on the return address (the rest was the PO Box of a friend who lives in the mountains and told me he'll pass along any response). At the bottom I also put "Formam autem consequitur functio," which he might think is some sort of legalese, but translates to "form follows function." I doubt he'll get the joke, but you never know. Don't send anything that actually looks anatomically correct
or harassing, that might be illegal, but I urge you all to send something silly along to this poor released prisoner of war to brighten his day. Especially those of you who waded through the first 50 pages of his 250-page court-clogging filing like I did (ouch again!)."Follow the Money"
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
After a "few days" morphed into 11, Mr. Payne finally tells his story (sort of).
Sunday, January 24, 2016
An explination of what happened to Freewill
First I want to thank those who have donated funds to me while I was held captive. Federal Court filings are very expensive! I still can use more donations to help. Thank You!
In 2011, I ended all fraudulent contracts with the corporation UNITED STATES INC. I became a North American inhabitant. An American National as recognized with clear distinction from a U.S. Citizen in Title 8 U.S.C. § 1101. That section also denies any possible dual citizenship.
The STATE OF MICHIGAN judges are under orders that all litigants that represent themselves must loose at all costs. Michigan court system is operating as a demonstration court process that has an open book to do as they please. 17 other states have adopted this system. They ignore their own rules. I have challenged them on this as they reach out of their jurisdiction to profit from me. Back in 2011 I expatriated from U.S. Citizenship under the international upheld right to self determination. I have an Apostille/Act of state that is literally diplomatic immunity. All contracts ended. SSN, DL, BC,and VR all rebutted. The franchise STATE OF MICHIGAN courts and policy enforcers have failed to uphold the Apostille and have pursued to violate my rights. In 2011 I had investigators from the coastguard attending a traffic ticket case with me and I exposed the way the state courts operate in maritime law to hold maritime liens against me unlawfully. The investigators asked me what action I want them to take and I responded that I wanted the judge arrested for inland piracy. The investigators informed me they had to council with their superiors first. This started a big problem between Judge Advocate General and the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. The next thing I found out was the investigators were sent to Afghanistan and the Coastguard refused any further involvement. I then filed a challenge of jurisdiction into the record. Once the jurisdiction of the court is challenged, it must be answered in detail and the court cannot move forward. Jurisdiction cannot be assumed even by a black robe. The judge ignored the challenge and issued warrants that were abinitio that means they do not exist in law. I was arrested on September 1st 2015 on these warrants and have moved the case to Federal court under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1441 no fair trial possible in a state court and because of my Apostle, the case must be in federal court. The state judge tried to push court appointed attorney on me and I had to refuse. Then on December 1st, the state judge tried to bait me with a plea bargain and waive all fees against me. I told the state judge that I was suing her in Federal court and send me back to my cell. She got very nervous and started studdering. The bailiff was gawking at me with disbelief. They are very afraid of me.
The Federal court case is listing all Michigan judges as the defendants. Everything I have done was under the council of nine Supreme Court Justices and I have broken no laws. The Federal judge I have goes strictly by the book as I have done.
Last summer two deputies showed up on my front porch to either arrest me or collect $6,000. I informed them that I was not a U.S. resident and I do not use their corporation's internal trading Federal Reserve notes. I use Iraq Dinar for trade. They informed me that the county accepts Dinar as payment. That caught me by surprise! I said "Oh really?" and told them to hang on, I'll be right back. I went and grabbed a handful of dinar and returned. The deputies said they had no idea of the exchange rate. I informed them the oil rate was $95 per Dinar. They figured about 74 Dinar would cover the $6,000 and accepted two 50 Dinar notes for payment with the promise of a receipt and change due for $3,500. I also have this tied up in the Federal Court as the state must accept Dinar as Payment at the rate of $95 per Dinar. If successful, everyone will be able to do the same in all states! Do you smell an RV being triggered? I am tired of the hot air from the gurus and decided to force it myself!
$500 million in punitive damages, $70 million in Apostle damages, $200 million in copyright damages, 1.8 million per day for 137 days, and much more being added. I am after the franchise STATE OF MICHIGAN charter and the removal of the B.A.R. association. I will then turn over the charter to the republic.
Most people cannot comprehend how big this case is and the ramifications!
I know there will be many responses with many suggestions or critics saying it is wrong or whatever, but hear this... I am working with the best of the best right now and know what I am doing and they know what they are doing. The Bill of Rights 10th Article lists what about where the power resides?? I baited the bottom feeding scum suckers back in 2011 for this to happen and they took the bait! Never under estimate what one guy with guts can do.
~Freewill
Posted by Freewill at 1:17 PM
Amazing! Never doubt what I guy who's nuts can think he is doing.
BTW, if you think Freewill has a spelling problem, you're wrong. The all-new masthead at NESARA News:
Sunday, January 24, 2016
An explination of what happened to Freewill
First I want to thank those who have donated funds to me while I was held captive. Federal Court filings are very expensive! I still can use more donations to help. Thank You!
In 2011, I ended all fraudulent contracts with the corporation UNITED STATES INC. I became a North American inhabitant. An American National as recognized with clear distinction from a U.S. Citizen in Title 8 U.S.C. § 1101. That section also denies any possible dual citizenship.
The STATE OF MICHIGAN judges are under orders that all litigants that represent themselves must loose at all costs. Michigan court system is operating as a demonstration court process that has an open book to do as they please. 17 other states have adopted this system. They ignore their own rules. I have challenged them on this as they reach out of their jurisdiction to profit from me. Back in 2011 I expatriated from U.S. Citizenship under the international upheld right to self determination. I have an Apostille/Act of state that is literally diplomatic immunity. All contracts ended. SSN, DL, BC,and VR all rebutted. The franchise STATE OF MICHIGAN courts and policy enforcers have failed to uphold the Apostille and have pursued to violate my rights. In 2011 I had investigators from the coastguard attending a traffic ticket case with me and I exposed the way the state courts operate in maritime law to hold maritime liens against me unlawfully. The investigators asked me what action I want them to take and I responded that I wanted the judge arrested for inland piracy. The investigators informed me they had to council with their superiors first. This started a big problem between Judge Advocate General and the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. The next thing I found out was the investigators were sent to Afghanistan and the Coastguard refused any further involvement. I then filed a challenge of jurisdiction into the record. Once the jurisdiction of the court is challenged, it must be answered in detail and the court cannot move forward. Jurisdiction cannot be assumed even by a black robe. The judge ignored the challenge and issued warrants that were abinitio that means they do not exist in law. I was arrested on September 1st 2015 on these warrants and have moved the case to Federal court under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1441 no fair trial possible in a state court and because of my Apostle, the case must be in federal court. The state judge tried to push court appointed attorney on me and I had to refuse. Then on December 1st, the state judge tried to bait me with a plea bargain and waive all fees against me. I told the state judge that I was suing her in Federal court and send me back to my cell. She got very nervous and started studdering. The bailiff was gawking at me with disbelief. They are very afraid of me.
The Federal court case is listing all Michigan judges as the defendants. Everything I have done was under the council of nine Supreme Court Justices and I have broken no laws. The Federal judge I have goes strictly by the book as I have done.
Last summer two deputies showed up on my front porch to either arrest me or collect $6,000. I informed them that I was not a U.S. resident and I do not use their corporation's internal trading Federal Reserve notes. I use Iraq Dinar for trade. They informed me that the county accepts Dinar as payment. That caught me by surprise! I said "Oh really?" and told them to hang on, I'll be right back. I went and grabbed a handful of dinar and returned. The deputies said they had no idea of the exchange rate. I informed them the oil rate was $95 per Dinar. They figured about 74 Dinar would cover the $6,000 and accepted two 50 Dinar notes for payment with the promise of a receipt and change due for $3,500. I also have this tied up in the Federal Court as the state must accept Dinar as Payment at the rate of $95 per Dinar. If successful, everyone will be able to do the same in all states! Do you smell an RV being triggered? I am tired of the hot air from the gurus and decided to force it myself!
$500 million in punitive damages, $70 million in Apostle damages, $200 million in copyright damages, 1.8 million per day for 137 days, and much more being added. I am after the franchise STATE OF MICHIGAN charter and the removal of the B.A.R. association. I will then turn over the charter to the republic.
Most people cannot comprehend how big this case is and the ramifications!
I know there will be many responses with many suggestions or critics saying it is wrong or whatever, but hear this... I am working with the best of the best right now and know what I am doing and they know what they are doing. The Bill of Rights 10th Article lists what about where the power resides?? I baited the bottom feeding scum suckers back in 2011 for this to happen and they took the bait! Never under estimate what one guy with guts can do.
~Freewill
Posted by Freewill at 1:17 PM
Amazing! Never doubt what I guy who's nuts can think he is doing.
BTW, if you think Freewill has a spelling problem, you're wrong. The all-new masthead at NESARA News:
Reminds me of a famous traffic case in the town I live in, where a person who got a speeding ticket told the judge, "It wasn't my fault, my radar detector was broken."Freewill is back!
For those spelling critics out there...
Remember this...
Android spell checker is not always accurate!
"Follow the Money"
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Comments on the above Freewill post so far:
20 comments:
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 1:33 PM
FREEWILL... youre th MAN!!!!
Carnival Girl January 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM
http://reignoftheheavens.com/?p=1827 show if you seriously want to help the people research and join if you want an end to the no justice system of your US
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 2:06 PM
You are wrong on just about everything. You have not renounced your citizenship and even if you had, you are subject to the laws of Michigan as long as you are inside its borders.
Your lawsuit is just going to give you more trouble.
The word is Apostille, not Apostle. The Apostille Convention authorizes one country to recognize legal documents issued by another country. Whatever document you have signed is not issued by any authority in the United States so is not recognized by the countries that signed the Convention.
big man January 24, 2016 at 4:32 PM
I know for a fact that Freewill has a Apostille, the same as the one I have. It was issued by the STATE OF MICHIGAN with their STATE SEAL on it.
big man January 24, 2016 at 4:39 PM
Show me the law that says that because I am on the land commonly known as MICHIGAN that the law apples to me. The only law that apply s to me is GODS law=common Law the highest law on earth. I consent not to any man made laws. Common law only. If you don't like it bite me.
Ah ha, the old and well-known "bite me" legal argument.
Freewill January 24, 2016 at 4:54 PM
Anonymous, you have no idea of what else I have done. I have done much more. Besides, what the hell have you done other than provide lip service?
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:26 PM
You are welcome to your delusions Freewill, but don't burden the rest of us with your frivolous lawsuits.
marie January 24, 2016 at 6:03 PM
ANON: 2:06 The SO CALLED LAWS OF MICHIGAN/EVERY STATE WHICH HAS THE WORD [OF] IN IT OR ALL CAPPS OR HAS IS ON THE DUN & BAR LIST WITH A NUMBER ARE STATUTES, CODES, AND ORDINANCES/CORPORATE POLICY. UNLESS FREEWILL IS A CORPORATION HE IS NOT SUBJECT TO CORPORATE LAWS. A CORPORATION CAN ONLY DEAL WITH A CORPORATION AND THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE MADE US A CORPORATION VIA YOUR ALL CAPS NAME SO THAT THEY CAN PLUNDER US AND ABUSE US AND STEAL EVERYTHING THAT WE HAVE INCLUDING OUR FREEDOM.
IF I REGISTER TO VOTE I AM GOING TO CROSS OUT UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND PUT IN AMERICAN NATIONAL BUT JUST LIKE MY DRIVERS LICENSE THEY ARE GOING TO SEND IT BACK WITH MY ALL CAPS NAME AND THEY DO THAT FOR A REASON. THAT DOES NOT MAKE ME A CORPORATION AND IT DOES NOT SUBJECT ME TO THEIR FRAUDULENT LAWS WHICH ARE ACTUALLY CORPORATE POLICY JUST AS IF YOU ARE WORKING AT WALMART. I LIVE BY ONE RULE AND THAT IS HARM NO ONE OR THEIR PROPERTY. THAT IS GOD'S LAW AND THAT IS UNIVERSAL LAW WHICH IS THE TRUE LAW OF A LIVING BREATHING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN OR WOMAN BORN ON AMERICAN TERRITORY. AS FAR AS FREEWILL'S LAWSUIT GETTING HIM INTO MORE TROUBLE...I DO NOT THINK THAT HE IS WORRIED ABOUT IT AS HE HAS SHOWN THAT HE WILL TAKE THE SHOTS AND BE JAILED AND TO COME OUT IN THE END A FREE MAN. NO MATTER IF HE WINS OR LOSES THE LAWSUIT HE HAS STOOD ON HIS PRINCIPLES AND WON. I HAVE DONE THE SAME WITH FLINT TOWNSHIP, MI POLICE. THE B*ST*RDS. THEY WILL BE DIRTY UNTIL THE END AND FREEWILL'S CASE HE MIGHT NOT GET HIS FIVE HUNDRED MILLION BUT NO MATTER WHAT FREEWILL IS HITTING THEM HARD AND THEY ARE SCARED JUST AS IN MY CASE WHICH HAPPENED IN 2011, WITH FLINT TOWNSHIP I DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING WHICH FREEWILL KNOWS BUT I AM A SPIT FIRE WHEN YOU SCREW WITH ME AND THEIR BUTT CHEEKS WERE SQUEEZED EVERYDAY; AND THEY ARE THEY ARE STILL SQUEEZING THEIR BUTTCHEEKS BECAUSE EVEN AFTER 2011, I AM STILL HOT ON THEIR *SS*S. I MIGHT NOT EVER GET MY JUSTICE BUT I DID AND STILL DO GET MY PIECE OF THEIR BUTTS ONE LITTLE BITE AT A TIME. I DOUBT FREEWILL WILL BE SCARED OF ANYTHING AFTER SPEND OVER 100 DAYS IN JAIL. THEY WILL BE SCARED AND THEY WILL HAVE THEIR *SS*S OP THE OPEN FIRE OF JUSTICE FOR A LONG TIME WITH WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO FREEWILL. FREEWILL KEEP IT UP AND NEVER GIVE IN AND NEVER GIVE UP. I AM BEHIND YOU ONE HUNDRED PERCENT AND I WOULD LOVE TO BE IN THE COURTROOM WITH YOU AS THOSE ATTORNEYS ALONE NEED A LITTLE EDUCATION ON WHOM IS REALLY IN CHARGE.
AS FAR AS APOSTILLE OR APOSTLE. WHO CARES. YOU KNEW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT. I DO KNOW THAT HE DOES HAVE AN APOSTILLE FROM THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. I KNOW FREEWILL PERSONALLY. I KNOW WHAT FREEWILL AND OTHERS HAVE DONE AND I KNOW THAT THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. THEY HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE INFO BEHIND THE SCENES THAN YOU DO. I KNOW SOME OF THE ISSUES BEHIND THE SCENES BUT NOT PRIVY TO ALL BUT I DO KNOW THAT THE APOSTILLE IS REAL. ANON: 2:06 YOU SOUND LIKE AN ISRALI/FOREIGN CORPORATE AGENT WHETHER IN THE COURT SYSTEM OR ONE OF THE ALPHABET AGENCIES. WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE YOUR CRAP ANY LONGER. TRUST ME ON THAT...
I'm not 100% certain, but Marie seems to have used some unhygienic sexual fetish in her court case and lost. I suggest all court attendees wash their hands with Lysol.
Steve January 24, 2016 at 6:06 PM
@bigman, Michigan's constitution and the Federal constitution are what say that the law applies to everyone on the land. It's been that for over 200 years. And as to Freewill, it's immoral and unethical for you to be begging for donations while lying and hiding the reasons for your arrest.
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 6:25 PM
It's the paperwork you file within the court before ever going to court that counts and then knowing what to say and what not to say when and if you end up in court. You should be asking most of the questions and not them. They can not answer your questions without revealing their fraud.
I know Freewill and I can tell you that he and the group he works with knows what they are doing.
Two counties and the state of Mich. are in deep doo-doo now after what they did to the wrong man. They picked the wrong battle and wrong man to be fooling with. Ken T.
Carnival Girl January 24, 2016 at 6:29 PM
http://governmentoftheunitedstatesofame ... rnational/
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM
Why are you trying to sue in Federal Court when you claim you are not subject to the law?
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:07 PM
good god i don't know what the hell you guys are talking about but, GOD BLESS AND GO GET EM HANGING IS TOO GOOD FOR THEM
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM
Well, it seems you sure right about criticism and advice. Having been through the kangaroo court system for many years, I do not believe there is a right way. I am still interested in how your case works out, so ignore the criticism, walk your own path, and keep us informed.
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM
A) Many are shocked and surprised you didn't leave with two broken legs. Are you sure you are really here and aren't being tortured somewhere else?
B) An Apostille means about as much as a rotten banana peel to these courts. If you did not file official (sealed) articles of dissolution to dissolve the corporation, then they still have the right to hassle you and stalk you. Even if you have finally filed to dissolve, the Federal Courts shouldn't be dealing with you at all and are not allowed to.
C) Having a Federal court have compassion for your situation is very rare, be certain to thank them. Likewise, go to a Jury foreman and an article III court like Alaska has. You can get a default judgment against the crooks for thousands of dollars and in all likelihood they will be locked up.
D) Have I mentioned an Apostille is about as useful as a wet dollar bill?? Be positive you have dissolved yourself in court (strawman) and relieved all duties. Carry a taser as its better to be safe than sorry!
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:41 PM
The defendants are.
marie January 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM
"The Federal court case is listing all Michigan judges as the defendants"
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 9:17 PM
Marie, none of the "defendants" is worried about Freewill's lawssuit. He will lose, just as you lost!
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 10:20 PM
I would guess the lawsuit doesn't say 'all Michigan judges', as that names no one to sue, and it names no corporation because there is no corporate entity on Dunn and Bradstreet named All Michigan judges, so I can only assume someone has gone through the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Office of Court Administrator for the corporate State of Michigan and retrieved all the names of the active and sitting judges, and then added some john does 1-99 and maybe even added, visiting, retired, and the others that pop in and sit at the bench causing harm to the people.
Federal court surprises me, because with out the contract, all of them dissolved, I would figure a Federal court could not even recognize Freewill, let alone see an appearance from Freewill, without some representation.
All corporations are represented, corporations don't speak, they are spoken for.
As for suing real people, I would have guessed a more appropriate court would be one that deals with real, and I do mean real, things, people, and property, and that would be the Superior court of the state of Michigan.
As Freewill states, he's got a ton of people who know everything surrounding and supporting him, so it can only be presumed (like courts do with presumption), that there is a reason he's out of the system and can use the Federal court in the system to sue all Michigan judges.
No mention of the bar, or the court that he was forced to intercourse in business with, or the fake authority he was forced to go with when he was taken.
Who pays, the penalty if the defendants are insolvent?
Federal court filings my be expensive, but the people helping I would have thought would have helped the filing be the pauper status so the fees could be waived.
I am glad FreeWill is out. Someone says he is not stating why he was jailed, and if he has immunity, it does not matter what 'they' say is why he was jailed, because they had no power to jail one who is immune, regardless of why they claim to have done it.
One who is immune does not have to admit to any false charge, let alone explain what charge someone who has operated falsely used to jail them.
$100,000 is what was initially requested, and the support of nine Supreme Court Justices would or should mean you don't need to pay that much to get the remedy you seek.
If something is criminal, then federal criminal investigating agencies make sense, but if it's contractual like the constitution contract, then it makes sense a court is involved.
Thanks for sharing, I have more questions than anything, but I am glad you, Freewill, are home with your family, even though it is known to do what is right sometimes takes you from the family, and that's what we are here for. To do the right thing for our families and people who will never know what was done, benefited them too.
Federal suits are civil? Civil suits require actual names of actual people who caused actual harm. I don't know how you enjoin all of the judges if you only came across one or a few the time you were captive.
I await the results of the lawsuit. It is apparent you can't tell us everything, and the questions some of us have, you and those in the know with you, have thought of everything already.
Will that money be paid in fiat on the way down to the collapse, or is it paid in some value like property or assets in and of the building of the corporation you are suing?
Unknown January 24, 2016 at 9:13 PM
i sued the county clerk in Michigan, the judge ran out of the room, two weeks later, broke 12 mandatory court rules and about 50 laws, that part sounds right, the dinar does not.
That clears a lot up. BTW, the masthead has a new "my dog ate it" addition, no doubt to clarify the spell-check comment.
20 comments:
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 1:33 PM
FREEWILL... youre th MAN!!!!
Carnival Girl January 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM
http://reignoftheheavens.com/?p=1827 show if you seriously want to help the people research and join if you want an end to the no justice system of your US
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 2:06 PM
You are wrong on just about everything. You have not renounced your citizenship and even if you had, you are subject to the laws of Michigan as long as you are inside its borders.
Your lawsuit is just going to give you more trouble.
The word is Apostille, not Apostle. The Apostille Convention authorizes one country to recognize legal documents issued by another country. Whatever document you have signed is not issued by any authority in the United States so is not recognized by the countries that signed the Convention.
big man January 24, 2016 at 4:32 PM
I know for a fact that Freewill has a Apostille, the same as the one I have. It was issued by the STATE OF MICHIGAN with their STATE SEAL on it.
big man January 24, 2016 at 4:39 PM
Show me the law that says that because I am on the land commonly known as MICHIGAN that the law apples to me. The only law that apply s to me is GODS law=common Law the highest law on earth. I consent not to any man made laws. Common law only. If you don't like it bite me.
Ah ha, the old and well-known "bite me" legal argument.
Freewill January 24, 2016 at 4:54 PM
Anonymous, you have no idea of what else I have done. I have done much more. Besides, what the hell have you done other than provide lip service?
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:26 PM
You are welcome to your delusions Freewill, but don't burden the rest of us with your frivolous lawsuits.
marie January 24, 2016 at 6:03 PM
ANON: 2:06 The SO CALLED LAWS OF MICHIGAN/EVERY STATE WHICH HAS THE WORD [OF] IN IT OR ALL CAPPS OR HAS IS ON THE DUN & BAR LIST WITH A NUMBER ARE STATUTES, CODES, AND ORDINANCES/CORPORATE POLICY. UNLESS FREEWILL IS A CORPORATION HE IS NOT SUBJECT TO CORPORATE LAWS. A CORPORATION CAN ONLY DEAL WITH A CORPORATION AND THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE MADE US A CORPORATION VIA YOUR ALL CAPS NAME SO THAT THEY CAN PLUNDER US AND ABUSE US AND STEAL EVERYTHING THAT WE HAVE INCLUDING OUR FREEDOM.
IF I REGISTER TO VOTE I AM GOING TO CROSS OUT UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND PUT IN AMERICAN NATIONAL BUT JUST LIKE MY DRIVERS LICENSE THEY ARE GOING TO SEND IT BACK WITH MY ALL CAPS NAME AND THEY DO THAT FOR A REASON. THAT DOES NOT MAKE ME A CORPORATION AND IT DOES NOT SUBJECT ME TO THEIR FRAUDULENT LAWS WHICH ARE ACTUALLY CORPORATE POLICY JUST AS IF YOU ARE WORKING AT WALMART. I LIVE BY ONE RULE AND THAT IS HARM NO ONE OR THEIR PROPERTY. THAT IS GOD'S LAW AND THAT IS UNIVERSAL LAW WHICH IS THE TRUE LAW OF A LIVING BREATHING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN OR WOMAN BORN ON AMERICAN TERRITORY. AS FAR AS FREEWILL'S LAWSUIT GETTING HIM INTO MORE TROUBLE...I DO NOT THINK THAT HE IS WORRIED ABOUT IT AS HE HAS SHOWN THAT HE WILL TAKE THE SHOTS AND BE JAILED AND TO COME OUT IN THE END A FREE MAN. NO MATTER IF HE WINS OR LOSES THE LAWSUIT HE HAS STOOD ON HIS PRINCIPLES AND WON. I HAVE DONE THE SAME WITH FLINT TOWNSHIP, MI POLICE. THE B*ST*RDS. THEY WILL BE DIRTY UNTIL THE END AND FREEWILL'S CASE HE MIGHT NOT GET HIS FIVE HUNDRED MILLION BUT NO MATTER WHAT FREEWILL IS HITTING THEM HARD AND THEY ARE SCARED JUST AS IN MY CASE WHICH HAPPENED IN 2011, WITH FLINT TOWNSHIP I DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING WHICH FREEWILL KNOWS BUT I AM A SPIT FIRE WHEN YOU SCREW WITH ME AND THEIR BUTT CHEEKS WERE SQUEEZED EVERYDAY; AND THEY ARE THEY ARE STILL SQUEEZING THEIR BUTTCHEEKS BECAUSE EVEN AFTER 2011, I AM STILL HOT ON THEIR *SS*S. I MIGHT NOT EVER GET MY JUSTICE BUT I DID AND STILL DO GET MY PIECE OF THEIR BUTTS ONE LITTLE BITE AT A TIME. I DOUBT FREEWILL WILL BE SCARED OF ANYTHING AFTER SPEND OVER 100 DAYS IN JAIL. THEY WILL BE SCARED AND THEY WILL HAVE THEIR *SS*S OP THE OPEN FIRE OF JUSTICE FOR A LONG TIME WITH WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO FREEWILL. FREEWILL KEEP IT UP AND NEVER GIVE IN AND NEVER GIVE UP. I AM BEHIND YOU ONE HUNDRED PERCENT AND I WOULD LOVE TO BE IN THE COURTROOM WITH YOU AS THOSE ATTORNEYS ALONE NEED A LITTLE EDUCATION ON WHOM IS REALLY IN CHARGE.
AS FAR AS APOSTILLE OR APOSTLE. WHO CARES. YOU KNEW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT. I DO KNOW THAT HE DOES HAVE AN APOSTILLE FROM THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. I KNOW FREEWILL PERSONALLY. I KNOW WHAT FREEWILL AND OTHERS HAVE DONE AND I KNOW THAT THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. THEY HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE INFO BEHIND THE SCENES THAN YOU DO. I KNOW SOME OF THE ISSUES BEHIND THE SCENES BUT NOT PRIVY TO ALL BUT I DO KNOW THAT THE APOSTILLE IS REAL. ANON: 2:06 YOU SOUND LIKE AN ISRALI/FOREIGN CORPORATE AGENT WHETHER IN THE COURT SYSTEM OR ONE OF THE ALPHABET AGENCIES. WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE YOUR CRAP ANY LONGER. TRUST ME ON THAT...
I'm not 100% certain, but Marie seems to have used some unhygienic sexual fetish in her court case and lost. I suggest all court attendees wash their hands with Lysol.
Steve January 24, 2016 at 6:06 PM
@bigman, Michigan's constitution and the Federal constitution are what say that the law applies to everyone on the land. It's been that for over 200 years. And as to Freewill, it's immoral and unethical for you to be begging for donations while lying and hiding the reasons for your arrest.
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 6:25 PM
It's the paperwork you file within the court before ever going to court that counts and then knowing what to say and what not to say when and if you end up in court. You should be asking most of the questions and not them. They can not answer your questions without revealing their fraud.
I know Freewill and I can tell you that he and the group he works with knows what they are doing.
Two counties and the state of Mich. are in deep doo-doo now after what they did to the wrong man. They picked the wrong battle and wrong man to be fooling with. Ken T.
Carnival Girl January 24, 2016 at 6:29 PM
http://governmentoftheunitedstatesofame ... rnational/
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM
Why are you trying to sue in Federal Court when you claim you are not subject to the law?
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:07 PM
good god i don't know what the hell you guys are talking about but, GOD BLESS AND GO GET EM HANGING IS TOO GOOD FOR THEM
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM
Well, it seems you sure right about criticism and advice. Having been through the kangaroo court system for many years, I do not believe there is a right way. I am still interested in how your case works out, so ignore the criticism, walk your own path, and keep us informed.
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM
A) Many are shocked and surprised you didn't leave with two broken legs. Are you sure you are really here and aren't being tortured somewhere else?
B) An Apostille means about as much as a rotten banana peel to these courts. If you did not file official (sealed) articles of dissolution to dissolve the corporation, then they still have the right to hassle you and stalk you. Even if you have finally filed to dissolve, the Federal Courts shouldn't be dealing with you at all and are not allowed to.
C) Having a Federal court have compassion for your situation is very rare, be certain to thank them. Likewise, go to a Jury foreman and an article III court like Alaska has. You can get a default judgment against the crooks for thousands of dollars and in all likelihood they will be locked up.
D) Have I mentioned an Apostille is about as useful as a wet dollar bill?? Be positive you have dissolved yourself in court (strawman) and relieved all duties. Carry a taser as its better to be safe than sorry!
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 5:41 PM
The defendants are.
marie January 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM
"The Federal court case is listing all Michigan judges as the defendants"
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 9:17 PM
Marie, none of the "defendants" is worried about Freewill's lawssuit. He will lose, just as you lost!
Anonymous January 24, 2016 at 10:20 PM
I would guess the lawsuit doesn't say 'all Michigan judges', as that names no one to sue, and it names no corporation because there is no corporate entity on Dunn and Bradstreet named All Michigan judges, so I can only assume someone has gone through the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Office of Court Administrator for the corporate State of Michigan and retrieved all the names of the active and sitting judges, and then added some john does 1-99 and maybe even added, visiting, retired, and the others that pop in and sit at the bench causing harm to the people.
Federal court surprises me, because with out the contract, all of them dissolved, I would figure a Federal court could not even recognize Freewill, let alone see an appearance from Freewill, without some representation.
All corporations are represented, corporations don't speak, they are spoken for.
As for suing real people, I would have guessed a more appropriate court would be one that deals with real, and I do mean real, things, people, and property, and that would be the Superior court of the state of Michigan.
As Freewill states, he's got a ton of people who know everything surrounding and supporting him, so it can only be presumed (like courts do with presumption), that there is a reason he's out of the system and can use the Federal court in the system to sue all Michigan judges.
No mention of the bar, or the court that he was forced to intercourse in business with, or the fake authority he was forced to go with when he was taken.
Who pays, the penalty if the defendants are insolvent?
Federal court filings my be expensive, but the people helping I would have thought would have helped the filing be the pauper status so the fees could be waived.
I am glad FreeWill is out. Someone says he is not stating why he was jailed, and if he has immunity, it does not matter what 'they' say is why he was jailed, because they had no power to jail one who is immune, regardless of why they claim to have done it.
One who is immune does not have to admit to any false charge, let alone explain what charge someone who has operated falsely used to jail them.
$100,000 is what was initially requested, and the support of nine Supreme Court Justices would or should mean you don't need to pay that much to get the remedy you seek.
If something is criminal, then federal criminal investigating agencies make sense, but if it's contractual like the constitution contract, then it makes sense a court is involved.
Thanks for sharing, I have more questions than anything, but I am glad you, Freewill, are home with your family, even though it is known to do what is right sometimes takes you from the family, and that's what we are here for. To do the right thing for our families and people who will never know what was done, benefited them too.
Federal suits are civil? Civil suits require actual names of actual people who caused actual harm. I don't know how you enjoin all of the judges if you only came across one or a few the time you were captive.
I await the results of the lawsuit. It is apparent you can't tell us everything, and the questions some of us have, you and those in the know with you, have thought of everything already.
Will that money be paid in fiat on the way down to the collapse, or is it paid in some value like property or assets in and of the building of the corporation you are suing?
Unknown January 24, 2016 at 9:13 PM
i sued the county clerk in Michigan, the judge ran out of the room, two weeks later, broke 12 mandatory court rules and about 50 laws, that part sounds right, the dinar does not.
That clears a lot up. BTW, the masthead has a new "my dog ate it" addition, no doubt to clarify the spell-check comment.
For those spelling critics out there...
Remember this...
Android spell checker is not always accurate! You can spell it right, then Android changes it!
"Follow the Money"
-
Gregg
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
If none of the courts have any jurisdiction or power over him, why would those courts have any power over anyone, like, eh, the people he's suing? If he's only suing "corporations" and they don't have any power, what good would suing them in courts that don't have any power do?
I'm sure, with a little effort, a very good imitation of Abbott & Costello's "Who's on First" routine.
This, kids, is why I've been saying for years that we need to divert more resources to mental health.
I'm sure, with a little effort, a very good imitation of Abbott & Costello's "Who's on First" routine.
This, kids, is why I've been saying for years that we need to divert more resources to mental health.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Two more comments, including one from Sweet Psychotic Marie. She didn't lose, she simply lost.
Teepee January 24, 2016 at 11:54 PM
Dear Unknown at 9:13PM Before Freewill was arrested, there was a chat box on this site; perhaps you remember it. Freewill told us about the incident where he paid his fine in dinars & told us since the dinars were accepted by the deputies that we could also pay our fines using dinar. I don't believe Freewill would lie about the acceptance of the dinar...why should he? If Freewill said it happened, then you can count on it being true. Ye of little faith...Freewill, how do I make a donation?
marie January 25, 2016 at 2:20 AM
ANON 9:17: I DID NOT LOSE. I DISMISSED THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE, WHICH MEANS I COULD HAVE COME BACK AND SUED THEM. I DID NOT KNOW ALL OF THE RULES OF FEDERAL COURT. WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE THEY HAD A MEETING IN THE JUDGES CHAMBERS BECAUSE OF THE THINGS THAT I BROUGHT INTO THE SUIT AND THEY DID NOT KNOW HOW TO HANDLE IT SO THEY KICKED IT UP TO FEDERAL COURT. CIRCUIT AND FEDERAL ARE TWO DIFFERENT BALLGAMES. I CAN DO CIRCUIT FEDERAL I CANNOT. I NEVER REFILED BECAUSE NO ONE WOULD HELP ME. LIKE I SAID...THEIR CHEEKS WERE SQUEEZED. I SENT MY CASE TO WASHINGTON AND I AM STILL FIGHTING BUT I HAVE NEVER GIVEN UP. I EMAILED EVERY CHIEF OF POLICE IN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. I LET THE GOVERNOR AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVE IT. I GOT THE FBI INVOLVED AND A FEW OTHERS. IF I HAD FREEWILLS KNOWLEDGE I MIGHT HAVE WON. SO THERE...MR. NASTY NEGATIVE AND HATEFUL!!!
Don't call Anonymous "nasty," Sweet Marie, he's not the one squeezing those cheeks.
Teepee January 24, 2016 at 11:54 PM
Dear Unknown at 9:13PM Before Freewill was arrested, there was a chat box on this site; perhaps you remember it. Freewill told us about the incident where he paid his fine in dinars & told us since the dinars were accepted by the deputies that we could also pay our fines using dinar. I don't believe Freewill would lie about the acceptance of the dinar...why should he? If Freewill said it happened, then you can count on it being true. Ye of little faith...Freewill, how do I make a donation?
marie January 25, 2016 at 2:20 AM
ANON 9:17: I DID NOT LOSE. I DISMISSED THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE, WHICH MEANS I COULD HAVE COME BACK AND SUED THEM. I DID NOT KNOW ALL OF THE RULES OF FEDERAL COURT. WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE THEY HAD A MEETING IN THE JUDGES CHAMBERS BECAUSE OF THE THINGS THAT I BROUGHT INTO THE SUIT AND THEY DID NOT KNOW HOW TO HANDLE IT SO THEY KICKED IT UP TO FEDERAL COURT. CIRCUIT AND FEDERAL ARE TWO DIFFERENT BALLGAMES. I CAN DO CIRCUIT FEDERAL I CANNOT. I NEVER REFILED BECAUSE NO ONE WOULD HELP ME. LIKE I SAID...THEIR CHEEKS WERE SQUEEZED. I SENT MY CASE TO WASHINGTON AND I AM STILL FIGHTING BUT I HAVE NEVER GIVEN UP. I EMAILED EVERY CHIEF OF POLICE IN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. I LET THE GOVERNOR AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVE IT. I GOT THE FBI INVOLVED AND A FEW OTHERS. IF I HAD FREEWILLS KNOWLEDGE I MIGHT HAVE WON. SO THERE...MR. NASTY NEGATIVE AND HATEFUL!!!
Don't call Anonymous "nasty," Sweet Marie, he's not the one squeezing those cheeks.
"Follow the Money"
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
For a $6000 with 100 dinars (worth less than 9 cents) review, see
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=10767
It's a little less than halfway down (page 1 of this very thread). If you see the picture of Free Willie the whale, you've gone too far.
In other breaking wind, er, news, Freewill likes Teepee's suggestion on donations:
Teepee January 24, 2016 at 11:54 PM
Dear Unknown at 9:13PM Before Freewill was arrested, there was a chat box on this site; perhaps you remember it. Freewill told us about the incident where he paid his fine in dinars & told us since the dinars were accepted by the deputies that we could also pay our fines using dinar. I don't believe Freewill would lie about the acceptance of the dinar...why should he? If Freewill said it happened, then you can count on it being true. Ye of little faith...Freewill, how do I make a donation?
Freewill January 25, 2016 at 1:23 PM
Thanks Teepee, I will put a link up at the top of the blog this evening for donations.
The Dinar reference is the same as the one that started this particular post (Wow! Synchronicity).
Anonymous January 25, 2016 at 2:42 AM
There's a lot going on, and maybe FreeWill's lawsuit is triggering it, maybe not.
[I vote for "not"]
The Fed is going to offer money to the people to get final settlement of their theft.
The bank employees and owners steal a $100,000 home and offer a $300 check in a mortgage settlement and people cash the check? and they send a 1099A claiming you abandoned the property, they stole, and you file the 1099A in the tax year with the IRS telling the IRS you abandoned the property. (people don't read, and don't discern, no matter how many awareness blogs they visit.)
The man says he's a wall streeter. I want people who don't want to know, to not want to listen to it, so I'm not going to reveal where he makes the claim in the audio.
On another note for awareness bloggers.
Times are critical and awareness was supposed to be a honed skill by now.
Unlike the anonymous who wished death on people who are protecting their right.
We have many who will weep and wail for the decisions they make without discernment.
Dr Mount, said God spoke to him about what to do when it came to the life of one man.
If you listen to the audio, the inferred message is the man who's life was saved is evil.
He saved the evil life of one man based on input from God, is the inferred message.
Now he has a video out
Q. Is God is not talking to him, anymore?
He's asking aware people, to make a decision.
Q. Is God not going to tell him the answer?
Except the caveat may be the people can escape by getting on ships instead of being stuck on a ship. Ships that travel in space and time cannot bring you back to the same time and sometimes do not bring you back to the same space.
Twilight Zone episode, To Serve Man.
Dark Knight, movie, boat scene and decision to be made.
When someone wants to deceive you, they need you to be their non-interactive audience, and they control the dialogue without any way for you to ask questions.
Dr Mount's presentation reminded me of the time I sat in a multi-level marketing presentation for a water filter.
The man had a glass of water. He put a dye in it claiming the water was full of chemicals and impurities bad for our health.
The water turned yellow.
He poured the water into the filter, the water came out clear.
He finished the presentation, he did not allow Q&A and the only conversation he allowed is whether you were interested in selling the product, and he avoided eye contact with anyone that appeared to focus on the water and want to ask more about the 'results'.
I did not buy into the product because I knew he would not reveal one important thing.
What would that chemical have shown if he put it in the water AFTER it was sent through the water filter.
The man water filter man had an agenda and he controlled the medium so there could be no questions. Could Dr. Mount have made a talkshoe or freeconferencing conference call to get input?
Dr Mount pre stated that people are the intelligence community if we don't like what he's saying.
Intelligence should be asking questions.
Intelligence should be asking questions.
Conscience should be asking questions.
Why is he not asking God now, if man should have the power of God to destroy what is created in Genesis 1:1?
Levels above NASA asked him for his an answer, he says.
He got his ambassador status from the fake US and asks are we insane to believe certain people can bring us the Republic.
In the movie, The Box, if you wish for the death of someone to benefit you, you can also have death wished on you by someone who would benefit from making the same type of decision.
In the movie, Lucy, we are everywhere when the physical body is not.
In the move, Powder, we are everywhere when the physical body is not.
In the Ted Talk, When the mind/soul no longer perceives the body, we have unlimited and expansive existence.
I would prefer the intelligence that asked what he would do, would have been God.
change_is_comming_are_you_ready? January 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM
all court cases in america comes to one of two things. jurisdiction and attachment. pay attention folks Freewill has the correct approach and will win. Go get'm!
Kevin Miller January 25, 2016 at 10:03 AM
Anyway to find out what 17 states do not allow winning when one represents oneself? Seems Virginia is one of those states! How can I find this out and more information about this?? Thanks in advance!
A "talkshoe." If Anon 2:42 can use movies and TV episodes, so can I.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=10767
It's a little less than halfway down (page 1 of this very thread). If you see the picture of Free Willie the whale, you've gone too far.
In other breaking wind, er, news, Freewill likes Teepee's suggestion on donations:
Teepee January 24, 2016 at 11:54 PM
Dear Unknown at 9:13PM Before Freewill was arrested, there was a chat box on this site; perhaps you remember it. Freewill told us about the incident where he paid his fine in dinars & told us since the dinars were accepted by the deputies that we could also pay our fines using dinar. I don't believe Freewill would lie about the acceptance of the dinar...why should he? If Freewill said it happened, then you can count on it being true. Ye of little faith...Freewill, how do I make a donation?
Freewill January 25, 2016 at 1:23 PM
Thanks Teepee, I will put a link up at the top of the blog this evening for donations.
The Dinar reference is the same as the one that started this particular post (Wow! Synchronicity).
Anonymous January 25, 2016 at 2:42 AM
There's a lot going on, and maybe FreeWill's lawsuit is triggering it, maybe not.
[I vote for "not"]
The Fed is going to offer money to the people to get final settlement of their theft.
The bank employees and owners steal a $100,000 home and offer a $300 check in a mortgage settlement and people cash the check? and they send a 1099A claiming you abandoned the property, they stole, and you file the 1099A in the tax year with the IRS telling the IRS you abandoned the property. (people don't read, and don't discern, no matter how many awareness blogs they visit.)
The man says he's a wall streeter. I want people who don't want to know, to not want to listen to it, so I'm not going to reveal where he makes the claim in the audio.
On another note for awareness bloggers.
Times are critical and awareness was supposed to be a honed skill by now.
Unlike the anonymous who wished death on people who are protecting their right.
We have many who will weep and wail for the decisions they make without discernment.
Dr Mount, said God spoke to him about what to do when it came to the life of one man.
If you listen to the audio, the inferred message is the man who's life was saved is evil.
He saved the evil life of one man based on input from God, is the inferred message.
Now he has a video out
Q. Is God is not talking to him, anymore?
He's asking aware people, to make a decision.
Q. Is God not going to tell him the answer?
Except the caveat may be the people can escape by getting on ships instead of being stuck on a ship. Ships that travel in space and time cannot bring you back to the same time and sometimes do not bring you back to the same space.
Twilight Zone episode, To Serve Man.
Dark Knight, movie, boat scene and decision to be made.
When someone wants to deceive you, they need you to be their non-interactive audience, and they control the dialogue without any way for you to ask questions.
Dr Mount's presentation reminded me of the time I sat in a multi-level marketing presentation for a water filter.
The man had a glass of water. He put a dye in it claiming the water was full of chemicals and impurities bad for our health.
The water turned yellow.
He poured the water into the filter, the water came out clear.
He finished the presentation, he did not allow Q&A and the only conversation he allowed is whether you were interested in selling the product, and he avoided eye contact with anyone that appeared to focus on the water and want to ask more about the 'results'.
I did not buy into the product because I knew he would not reveal one important thing.
What would that chemical have shown if he put it in the water AFTER it was sent through the water filter.
The man water filter man had an agenda and he controlled the medium so there could be no questions. Could Dr. Mount have made a talkshoe or freeconferencing conference call to get input?
Dr Mount pre stated that people are the intelligence community if we don't like what he's saying.
Intelligence should be asking questions.
Intelligence should be asking questions.
Conscience should be asking questions.
Why is he not asking God now, if man should have the power of God to destroy what is created in Genesis 1:1?
Levels above NASA asked him for his an answer, he says.
He got his ambassador status from the fake US and asks are we insane to believe certain people can bring us the Republic.
In the movie, The Box, if you wish for the death of someone to benefit you, you can also have death wished on you by someone who would benefit from making the same type of decision.
In the movie, Lucy, we are everywhere when the physical body is not.
In the move, Powder, we are everywhere when the physical body is not.
In the Ted Talk, When the mind/soul no longer perceives the body, we have unlimited and expansive existence.
I would prefer the intelligence that asked what he would do, would have been God.
change_is_comming_are_you_ready? January 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM
all court cases in america comes to one of two things. jurisdiction and attachment. pay attention folks Freewill has the correct approach and will win. Go get'm!
Kevin Miller January 25, 2016 at 10:03 AM
Anyway to find out what 17 states do not allow winning when one represents oneself? Seems Virginia is one of those states! How can I find this out and more information about this?? Thanks in advance!
A "talkshoe." If Anon 2:42 can use movies and TV episodes, so can I.
"Follow the Money"
-
Jeffrey
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
He's got a huge amount of pre-trial detention racked up, he could easily get off with time served then claim a victory, his idiot followers would have no way to verify.Freewill has the correct approach and will win
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Destry Payne (Freewill) is given as a contact for Jim Garrow in 2014 posts (e.g. one on Orly Taitz website about President Obama stealing Jim Darrow’s Nobel Prize). Other names associated with this are Bob Gilman and William Tynan Brown. Perhaps some or all of these are the “brain trust” he’s using for his “unique” legal arguments.
Jim is best described as “a real piece of work.” He wrote a book, Pink Pagoda, supposedly about his exploits saving tens of thousands of Chinese baby girls, which I would applaud, but it seems to have been made up. Review online sum it up: “ridiculous and unsubstantiated accounts;,” “He sounds like he has both grandiose and religious delusions, probably with a narcissistic personality disorder,” and “Garrow is a lunatic.” No doubt it’s others making him look crazy.
Totally Stable Jim Garrow Is Angry That We're Making Him Look 'Crazy'
Submitted by Brian Tashman on Thursday, 1/23/2014 12:50 pm
Right-wing activist Jim Garrow took to Facebook today to call President Obama “The History Retard” and “one sick puppy” who displays “evidence of the psychological effects of malignant narcissism.”
In the very same interview, Rush proved his lack of insanity by arguing that someone “should disappear” Obama administration officials for their alleged hostility to the Constitution.
- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/t ... wRV5m.dpuf
His Nobel Prize nomination (he understands he would have won the peace prize, only Obama intervened and stole it) was supposedly for his non-existent work with Pink Pagoda and he's the only one who references it (in his book and in numerous articles/interview). He has also had his own run-ins with the law, here he gives his own version of what happened.
P.S. As for Destry not being a US or Michigan citizen and thus not bound by these laws, this must be a recent conversion because in 2012 he posted:
Jim is best described as “a real piece of work.” He wrote a book, Pink Pagoda, supposedly about his exploits saving tens of thousands of Chinese baby girls, which I would applaud, but it seems to have been made up. Review online sum it up: “ridiculous and unsubstantiated accounts;,” “He sounds like he has both grandiose and religious delusions, probably with a narcissistic personality disorder,” and “Garrow is a lunatic.” No doubt it’s others making him look crazy.
Totally Stable Jim Garrow Is Angry That We're Making Him Look 'Crazy'
Submitted by Brian Tashman on Thursday, 1/23/2014 12:50 pm
Right-wing activist Jim Garrow took to Facebook today to call President Obama “The History Retard” and “one sick puppy” who displays “evidence of the psychological effects of malignant narcissism.”
Garrow’s post was prompted by a Daily Caller article from Obama heckler Neil Munro, who badly distorts Obama’s comments on anti-Semitism and the Arab-Israeli conflict. In an interview with Erik Rush last week, Garrow argued that Right Wing Watch follows Saul Alinsky’s thirteen “rules for radicals” in an attempt to unfairly make him seem “crazy.”The History Retard: When some one [sic] might say that the President has neither a good grasp on reality nor a good grasp on history they would be making an understatement on a grand scale. What is sad for America is that Mr. Obama is so isolated from criticism that when he puts on full display for the world his very poor understanding of real history no one steps up and corrects him. This President has no clue and presents it sincerely and with aplomb, its [sic] just too bad that he is putting forward clear evidence of the psychological effects of malignant narcissism. This is one sick puppy.
- Dr. Jim Garrow
Because there is nothing crazy at all about Garrow’s assertions that Obama will soon claim to be communicating with aliens, try to kill 90% of Americans with a nuclear EMP attack to help George Soros make money and is part of a nefarious Arab-Chinese/Russian-Canadian conspiracy to destroy America.“Right Wing Watch, which will be reporting on what we just said, relies on the thirteen tactics that are available to them through Mr. Alinsky, they rely on that on how they report on you and I and they will spin what we’ve done so that we are ‘frozen,’ ‘freeze your opposition,’ present it in such a wacko, weird light that you will end up defending it and really being frozen as far as forward momentum and forward progress with whatever our agenda happens to be,” Garrow told Rush.
In the very same interview, Rush proved his lack of insanity by arguing that someone “should disappear” Obama administration officials for their alleged hostility to the Constitution.
- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/t ... wRV5m.dpuf
His Nobel Prize nomination (he understands he would have won the peace prize, only Obama intervened and stole it) was supposedly for his non-existent work with Pink Pagoda and he's the only one who references it (in his book and in numerous articles/interview). He has also had his own run-ins with the law, here he gives his own version of what happened.
William Tynan Brown has had his own run ins with the law, what I’ve found is lawsuits for being held against his will in mental hospitals – ‘nuff said. Bob Gilman is harder to chase down, but is said to live near him in or near Mt Pleasant, Michigan.“When I arrived home from the Infiltration Tour I unloaded my camper trailer and discovered a pistol in a Ruger bag with ammunition and a gun lock. I called my Son in Law Chris Neilsen who is a cop and he came over and had a look at it. He told me that it is a restricted weapon like one he had to turn in. I asked what they are worth on the black market and he told me an amount that floored me. He didn’t ask me where it came from oddly enough. My wife and I went for a ride on our Goldwing and when we got back the cops arrived and arrested me. They took my passport and kept me in jail for 5 hours. I have 4 charges against me. This was all a set up.”
...
...I showed it to my son in law and low and behold he turned it and me in to the local police. I now know how the Nazis got collaborator jews like George Soros to turn in his own people.
P.S. As for Destry not being a US or Michigan citizen and thus not bound by these laws, this must be a recent conversion because in 2012 he posted:
Destry Payne
to Traverse City Record-Eagle
March 2, 2013 ·
.
As a northern Michigan resident, I want to know if the local sheriffs are going to get a backbone and keep these unlawful federal rules and agents out of our counties like sheriffs in other states are doing.
"Follow the Money"
-
Deep Knight
- Posts: 5397
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:42 am
- Location: Washington DC
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
I had just finished a bogus "legal" letter to Judge Anna Rietzinger, and then saw on NESARA News that Freewill had topped it! Don't you just hate it when that happens to you?
Wednesday, February 3, 2016
NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY AND FRAUD from Freewill
For educational use only
NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY AND FRAUD
The Plaintiff(s) (People of the State of Michigan) AS A MATTER OF FACT, DO NOT EXIST AND DID NOT EXIST IN LAW AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINATION OF THIS ALLEGED COMPLAINT AS BEING A BANKRUPT CORPORATION AND IS CIVILLY DEAD, SEE HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 192 JUNE 5th, 1933, YOU ARE CIVILLY DEAD! A BANKRUPT CORPORATION!
Michigan courts have consistently held that a dissolved Corporation is essentially a " DEAD PERSON ", the same applies to a BANKRUPT CORPORATION, making any action taken by IT NULL AND VOID OF LAW. Please see Matter of Dissolution of Esquire Products Intern,, Inc. 145 Michigan Appeals 106, 377 NW 2nd 356 (a 1985 case), citing U.S. TRUCK Co. vs. Pennsylvania Surety Corp., 259 Mich. 422, 243 NW 2nd 311 (a 1932 case).
THIS COURT IS NOT THE TRUSTEE OF THE SAID UNITED STATES, NOR THE STATE OF MICHIGAN CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY, AND WOULD HAVE NO SUCH AUTHORITY TO SPEAK FOR THAT BANKRUPT CORPORATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, EVEN IF THE PLAINTIFF(S), OR AGENT(S) WERE PROPERLY LICENSED AND SWORN TO THEIR TIMELY OATH OF OFFICE, AND FILED THEIR SURETY BONDS TIMELY WITH THE PROPER AUTHORITY. THIS COURT HAS NO LAWFUL DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO SPEAK FOR, OR ACT FOR THE BANKRUPT CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, NOR FOR THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHER THE PLAINTIFF(S), AND AGENT(S) HAVE NO STANDING OR LAWFUL CAPACITY TO SUE THIS Alleged Defendant IN ERROR and any claims to the contrary are 100% FRAUD IN FACT!!
Now Michigan Courts have addressed the " STANDING TO SUE " DOCTRINE in several cases. In Department of Social Services vs. Baayoun 204 Mich. Appeals 170 , 514 NW 2nd 522 (a 1994 case), the Court held that " STANDING " relates to position or situation of a Party relative to the cause of action and other Parties at the time a Party seeks relief from the Court. Now in Taylor vs. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, 205 Mich. App. 644, 517 NW 2nd 864 (a 1994 case), the Court held that " STANDING " is a legal term used to denote the existence of a Party's interest in the outcome of litigation, which will assure sincere and vigorous advocacy
The Court further stated for the Record that to have "STANDING " a Party MUST DEMONSTRATE a legally protected interest that is in M.C.L.A. 201.3, jeopardy of being adversely affected and must allege a sufficient personal stake in the outcome of the dispute to ensure that the controversy to be adjudicated will be presented in an adversarial setting capable of judicial resolution.
In order to have standing, a party MUST SHOW a substantial interest and stake in the outcome of a controversy. Further see; ROGAN Vs. MORTON, 167 Mich. App. 483, 423 NW 2nd 237 ( a 1988 case), which held, " STANDING", AS A REQUISITE TO SUE, ensures that only those who have a substantial interest in the outcome of a LAWSUIT will be allowed to come into Court and Complain.
Further see in support WHITE LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASS'N vs. WHITEHALL, 22 Mich. App. 262, 177 NW 2nd 473 (a 1970 case ). Upon examination of these facts clearly THE PLAINTIFF(S) ARE NOT A PROPER PARTY, WITH STANDING, OR CAPACITY, TO BRING SUIT IN ANY CAPACITY BEFORE THIS COURT FOR THEY DO NOT EXIST IN LAW OR FACT, AND ARE CLEARLY CIVILLY DEAD IN FACT WITH ABSOLUTELY NO CAPACITY TO SUE OR BRING CLAIM AGAINST ANY PARTY IN THIS COURT OR ANY MICHIGAN COURT AS THEY ARE A BANKRUPT ENTITY SINCE 1933 AND IN FACT ARE IN RECEIVERSHIP AND ARE CIVILLY DEAD. SEE CLEARFIELD BANK AND TRUST vs. UNITED STATES, 462 F. Supp. 1193 , SEE THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE A STUDY IN JURISDICTIONAL DEFECTS/ DIVERSITY. OBVIOUSLY, PLAINTIFF(S) ARE A DEFACTO ENTITY , AND THEIR AGENTS ARE DEFACTO, A FICTION OF LAW A MERE NULLITY OR NON-EXISTENT PERSON AND IN THIS CASE A FRAUD ON THIS COURT and this Alleged Defendant; THE PLAINTIFF(S) HAVE NO STANDING OR CAPACITY TO LAWFULLY BRING PLAINTIFF'S UNFOUNDED, PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS, OR SPURIOUS COMPLAINTS BEFORE THIS COURT AND SUE. TO DO SO IS FRAUD, 100% FRAUD BY PLAINTIFF(S) OR THEIR AGENTS, ASSIGNS, ACTORS, CONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR COUNSELORS.
I REQUEST IN WRITING THAT YOU SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE!
THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU!
NOW FRAUD IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS IN THIS FICTION CASE (11U080280)
YOU NEED A LITTLE REFRESHER COURSE ON THE SUBJECT.
FRAUD is defined in BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 6th Edition on page 660
" An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. A false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment.. of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury. Anything calculated to deceive, whether by a single act or combination, or by the suppression of truth, or by suggestion of what is false, whether it be by direct falsehood or innuendo, by speech of silence, word of mouth, or look, or gesture. Delanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A., 318 Pa. Supra. 90, 464 A. 2nd 1243, 1251. A generic term, embracing all maltofarious means,.. “which human ingenuity can devise, and which are resorted to by one individual to get advantage over another by false suggestions or by suppression of truth, and includes all surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling, and UNFAIR way by which another is cheated. Johnson v. McDonald, 170 Okl. 117, 39 P.2nd 150 " BAD FAITH " and " FRAUD " are synonymous, and also synonyms of dishonesty, infidelity, faithlessness, unfairness, ect.”
I wish to point out that this explanation applies fully to my alleged Fictional Case in Error (11U080280) to date. I further wish to express my serious and sincere CONSTRUCTIVE OBJECTIONS to the Arbitrary and Capricious manner in which my case has been handled to date by those who are sworn on SACRED OATH(S) to protect me and my interests from such travesty of Justice. I am the beneficiary of " THE CONTRACT " between the Government and its great PEOPLE as I am one of " THE PEOPLE ". Please see BYARS vs. UNITED STATES 273 U.S. 28 and the 16th American Juris Prudence 2nd § 97, which held the Constitution shall be liberally interpreted to include every word, phrase, and syllable, in favor of the Clearly intended and expressly designated " BENEFICIARY THE CITIZEN " for the protection of RIGHTS AND PROPERTY. MY PROPERTY (MY RIGHTS) HAS NOT BEEN PROTECTED, IT HAS BEEN STOLEN ON A TAKING BY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKING OF A GOVERNMENT BODY POLITIC, WHO IS CLEARLY OUT OF CONTROL, ME AND MY LAWFULLY OWNED PROPERTY IN EVERY ASPECT.
Now WE honestly feel that the PLAINTIFF(S) and the Michigan Courts have perpetrated a FRAUD IN FACT AND LAW upon me and my lawfully owned property to my great injury and then knowingly continue the FRAUD when WE seek redress in the MICHIGAN COURTS for this injury, because WE dare to seek Justice and the protection of OUR Constitutional Rights against this FRAUDULENT OUT OF CONTROL PLAINTIFF(S), who have repetitively sought to injure or DEFRAUD these citizen members of the PEOPLE IN FACT AND LAW on so many, many occasions that it is Criminal NEGLECT of their sworn DUTY.... RES ipsa loquitur, WITH EXCLUSIVE CONTROL and clearly these PROTECTORS knew or are knowledgeable of exactly what they are doing or they clearly should know and these Plaintiff(s) deliberately do the deed or injury ANY.....WAY AND TO HELL WITH THE LAW OR OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!! THIS IS A STONE FACT!!! IT IS ABSOLUTE TREASON OR AN ATTEMPTED OVERTHROW OF OUR LAWFUL WE THE PEOPLE GOVERNMENT! HOW COULD IT BE CATEGORIZED ANY OTHER WAY?
Now WE give OUR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS to this arbitrary and capricious deliberate administrative abuse of process and also give OUR FORMAL NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS. WE INTEND TO SUE FOR OUR INJURIES FOR, 500,000,000,00. Five Hundred MILLION DOLLARS, and name every swinging joker for their unlawful or criminal deeds to injure US.
LET ALL PARTIES TAKE JUST NOTICE OF THIS FACT!!
These so-called OFFICERS OF THE LAW, all long schooled in the art and practice of LAW, have willfully, maliciously, intentionally, and wantonly have clearly deliberately injured us and induced us to our injury or irreparable harm by a specie of misinformation, disinformation, or a SPECIE OF SILENCE, wherein they have used all manner of colorable officialdom to make false and FRAUDULENT CLAIMS AND ACTIONS against us, personally or against our Lawfully owned property, which is a totally violation of LAW and these Plaintiff(s) damn well knew exactly what was done and by whom!! Please see U.S. vs. Prudden 424 F2d 1021, and U.S. vs. TWEEL, 550 F2d 297 AT 299-300, WHICH CASE HELD " silence can only be equated with FRAUD when there is a legal and moral duty to speak the TRUTH or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading to the injury of the parties."
FURTHER,.. In Re: Dunahay vs. Struik, 393 P 2d 930, (1964) 96 Arizona 246, which case held,...." FRAUD may be committed by a failure to speak when the DUTY, ( RES ipsa loquitur, with exclusive control), of speaking is imposed."
FURTHER,.. In Re: Batty vs. Arizona State Dental Board, 112 { 2d 870, 57 Arizona 239 (1941 case), which held,... " FRAUD may be committed by a failure to speak when the DUTY of speaking is imposed as much as by speaking falsely."
FURTHER,.. In Re: State vs. Coddington, 662 P 2d 115, 113 Arizona 480, Arizona App. (1983 case) which case held,.... " WHEN one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in effect a false and FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION that what is disclosed is the whole truth and nothing but the truth." and one can go on and on,...." Suppression of a material fact which a party is bound in good faith to disclose is equivalent to a false or FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION, thereby inducing me to my great injury, please see Leigh vs. Loyd , 224 P 2d 356, Arizona 84 (1954 case) and further see " WHEN one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the holding back of other facts FRAUD OR DECEIT may arise from silence where the DUTY TO SPEAK THE TRUTH, as well as prohibition from speaking an UNTRUTH existed under the LAW, ALSO FURTHER SEE Morrison vs. Acton, 198 P 2d 590, 68 Arizona 27 , (1948 case), which also supports Leigh v. Loyd SUPRA.
In short these cases go on, and on, and on, so ANY PARTY could be given sufficient NOTICE OR WARNING of activity which would or could be FRAUDULENT and books and books of considerable collections at LAW LIBRARIES speak volumes to this very SUBJECT! Clearly the Plaintiff(s) knew or should have known what they were doing to injure me was wrong, FRAUDULENT, AND UNLAWFUL IN FACT. Now when such activities of misinformation or disinformation or a specie of silence, whose clear purpose is to miss-inform, or dis-inform a party in interest of real facts and Lawful Rights then FRAUD HAS CLEARLY BEEN DONE! Especially if a party has relied in GOOD FAITH on such reliance's to their very great injury, then clear UNLAWFUL, INSTITUTIONAL BAD FAITH HAS IN FACT OCCURRED AND THE GOVERNMENT ENTITY, WHO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH ACTIVITY KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY IS IN BREACH OF THEIR ORIGINAL CIVIC PURPOSE TRUSTEESHIP THEY WERE IN FACT CREATED TO PROTECT AGAINST! THIS IS A BREACH OF FAITH SUBJECTING THE OFFENDING PARTY TO " QUO WARRANTO " OF THEIR INTENDED GOVERNMENTAL ENFRANCHISED POWER OR RIGHTS, which they were originally created under their Corporation CHARTER pursuant to Public Acts 230 & 231 of Public Acts,
HOME RULE, OR CHARTER, for ALL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES and that is just a fact.
WE CLAIM FRAUD AND WE TIMELY OBJECT TO ALL THE FRAUD IN THIS CASE (11U080280) AND FOREWARN THE PARTIES THAT LEGAL ACTION IS EMINENT AND WILL BE COMMENCED VERY SHORTLY IF THIS MATTER IS NOT TIMELY REPAIRED IN TOTAL TO MY COMPLETE SATISFACTION.
FAIR WARNING IS FAIRLY GIVEN!
Posted by Freewill at 9:28 PM
If anyone can translate this (I speak only a little gibberish, and read less), please let me know.
Wednesday, February 3, 2016
NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY AND FRAUD from Freewill
For educational use only
NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY AND FRAUD
The Plaintiff(s) (People of the State of Michigan) AS A MATTER OF FACT, DO NOT EXIST AND DID NOT EXIST IN LAW AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINATION OF THIS ALLEGED COMPLAINT AS BEING A BANKRUPT CORPORATION AND IS CIVILLY DEAD, SEE HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 192 JUNE 5th, 1933, YOU ARE CIVILLY DEAD! A BANKRUPT CORPORATION!
Michigan courts have consistently held that a dissolved Corporation is essentially a " DEAD PERSON ", the same applies to a BANKRUPT CORPORATION, making any action taken by IT NULL AND VOID OF LAW. Please see Matter of Dissolution of Esquire Products Intern,, Inc. 145 Michigan Appeals 106, 377 NW 2nd 356 (a 1985 case), citing U.S. TRUCK Co. vs. Pennsylvania Surety Corp., 259 Mich. 422, 243 NW 2nd 311 (a 1932 case).
THIS COURT IS NOT THE TRUSTEE OF THE SAID UNITED STATES, NOR THE STATE OF MICHIGAN CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY, AND WOULD HAVE NO SUCH AUTHORITY TO SPEAK FOR THAT BANKRUPT CORPORATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, EVEN IF THE PLAINTIFF(S), OR AGENT(S) WERE PROPERLY LICENSED AND SWORN TO THEIR TIMELY OATH OF OFFICE, AND FILED THEIR SURETY BONDS TIMELY WITH THE PROPER AUTHORITY. THIS COURT HAS NO LAWFUL DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO SPEAK FOR, OR ACT FOR THE BANKRUPT CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, NOR FOR THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHER THE PLAINTIFF(S), AND AGENT(S) HAVE NO STANDING OR LAWFUL CAPACITY TO SUE THIS Alleged Defendant IN ERROR and any claims to the contrary are 100% FRAUD IN FACT!!
Now Michigan Courts have addressed the " STANDING TO SUE " DOCTRINE in several cases. In Department of Social Services vs. Baayoun 204 Mich. Appeals 170 , 514 NW 2nd 522 (a 1994 case), the Court held that " STANDING " relates to position or situation of a Party relative to the cause of action and other Parties at the time a Party seeks relief from the Court. Now in Taylor vs. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, 205 Mich. App. 644, 517 NW 2nd 864 (a 1994 case), the Court held that " STANDING " is a legal term used to denote the existence of a Party's interest in the outcome of litigation, which will assure sincere and vigorous advocacy
The Court further stated for the Record that to have "STANDING " a Party MUST DEMONSTRATE a legally protected interest that is in M.C.L.A. 201.3, jeopardy of being adversely affected and must allege a sufficient personal stake in the outcome of the dispute to ensure that the controversy to be adjudicated will be presented in an adversarial setting capable of judicial resolution.
In order to have standing, a party MUST SHOW a substantial interest and stake in the outcome of a controversy. Further see; ROGAN Vs. MORTON, 167 Mich. App. 483, 423 NW 2nd 237 ( a 1988 case), which held, " STANDING", AS A REQUISITE TO SUE, ensures that only those who have a substantial interest in the outcome of a LAWSUIT will be allowed to come into Court and Complain.
Further see in support WHITE LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASS'N vs. WHITEHALL, 22 Mich. App. 262, 177 NW 2nd 473 (a 1970 case ). Upon examination of these facts clearly THE PLAINTIFF(S) ARE NOT A PROPER PARTY, WITH STANDING, OR CAPACITY, TO BRING SUIT IN ANY CAPACITY BEFORE THIS COURT FOR THEY DO NOT EXIST IN LAW OR FACT, AND ARE CLEARLY CIVILLY DEAD IN FACT WITH ABSOLUTELY NO CAPACITY TO SUE OR BRING CLAIM AGAINST ANY PARTY IN THIS COURT OR ANY MICHIGAN COURT AS THEY ARE A BANKRUPT ENTITY SINCE 1933 AND IN FACT ARE IN RECEIVERSHIP AND ARE CIVILLY DEAD. SEE CLEARFIELD BANK AND TRUST vs. UNITED STATES, 462 F. Supp. 1193 , SEE THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE A STUDY IN JURISDICTIONAL DEFECTS/ DIVERSITY. OBVIOUSLY, PLAINTIFF(S) ARE A DEFACTO ENTITY , AND THEIR AGENTS ARE DEFACTO, A FICTION OF LAW A MERE NULLITY OR NON-EXISTENT PERSON AND IN THIS CASE A FRAUD ON THIS COURT and this Alleged Defendant; THE PLAINTIFF(S) HAVE NO STANDING OR CAPACITY TO LAWFULLY BRING PLAINTIFF'S UNFOUNDED, PATENTLY FRIVOLOUS, OR SPURIOUS COMPLAINTS BEFORE THIS COURT AND SUE. TO DO SO IS FRAUD, 100% FRAUD BY PLAINTIFF(S) OR THEIR AGENTS, ASSIGNS, ACTORS, CONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR COUNSELORS.
I REQUEST IN WRITING THAT YOU SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE!
THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU!
NOW FRAUD IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS IN THIS FICTION CASE (11U080280)
YOU NEED A LITTLE REFRESHER COURSE ON THE SUBJECT.
FRAUD is defined in BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 6th Edition on page 660
" An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. A false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment.. of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury. Anything calculated to deceive, whether by a single act or combination, or by the suppression of truth, or by suggestion of what is false, whether it be by direct falsehood or innuendo, by speech of silence, word of mouth, or look, or gesture. Delanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A., 318 Pa. Supra. 90, 464 A. 2nd 1243, 1251. A generic term, embracing all maltofarious means,.. “which human ingenuity can devise, and which are resorted to by one individual to get advantage over another by false suggestions or by suppression of truth, and includes all surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling, and UNFAIR way by which another is cheated. Johnson v. McDonald, 170 Okl. 117, 39 P.2nd 150 " BAD FAITH " and " FRAUD " are synonymous, and also synonyms of dishonesty, infidelity, faithlessness, unfairness, ect.”
I wish to point out that this explanation applies fully to my alleged Fictional Case in Error (11U080280) to date. I further wish to express my serious and sincere CONSTRUCTIVE OBJECTIONS to the Arbitrary and Capricious manner in which my case has been handled to date by those who are sworn on SACRED OATH(S) to protect me and my interests from such travesty of Justice. I am the beneficiary of " THE CONTRACT " between the Government and its great PEOPLE as I am one of " THE PEOPLE ". Please see BYARS vs. UNITED STATES 273 U.S. 28 and the 16th American Juris Prudence 2nd § 97, which held the Constitution shall be liberally interpreted to include every word, phrase, and syllable, in favor of the Clearly intended and expressly designated " BENEFICIARY THE CITIZEN " for the protection of RIGHTS AND PROPERTY. MY PROPERTY (MY RIGHTS) HAS NOT BEEN PROTECTED, IT HAS BEEN STOLEN ON A TAKING BY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKING OF A GOVERNMENT BODY POLITIC, WHO IS CLEARLY OUT OF CONTROL, ME AND MY LAWFULLY OWNED PROPERTY IN EVERY ASPECT.
Now WE honestly feel that the PLAINTIFF(S) and the Michigan Courts have perpetrated a FRAUD IN FACT AND LAW upon me and my lawfully owned property to my great injury and then knowingly continue the FRAUD when WE seek redress in the MICHIGAN COURTS for this injury, because WE dare to seek Justice and the protection of OUR Constitutional Rights against this FRAUDULENT OUT OF CONTROL PLAINTIFF(S), who have repetitively sought to injure or DEFRAUD these citizen members of the PEOPLE IN FACT AND LAW on so many, many occasions that it is Criminal NEGLECT of their sworn DUTY.... RES ipsa loquitur, WITH EXCLUSIVE CONTROL and clearly these PROTECTORS knew or are knowledgeable of exactly what they are doing or they clearly should know and these Plaintiff(s) deliberately do the deed or injury ANY.....WAY AND TO HELL WITH THE LAW OR OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!! THIS IS A STONE FACT!!! IT IS ABSOLUTE TREASON OR AN ATTEMPTED OVERTHROW OF OUR LAWFUL WE THE PEOPLE GOVERNMENT! HOW COULD IT BE CATEGORIZED ANY OTHER WAY?
Now WE give OUR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS to this arbitrary and capricious deliberate administrative abuse of process and also give OUR FORMAL NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS. WE INTEND TO SUE FOR OUR INJURIES FOR, 500,000,000,00. Five Hundred MILLION DOLLARS, and name every swinging joker for their unlawful or criminal deeds to injure US.
LET ALL PARTIES TAKE JUST NOTICE OF THIS FACT!!
These so-called OFFICERS OF THE LAW, all long schooled in the art and practice of LAW, have willfully, maliciously, intentionally, and wantonly have clearly deliberately injured us and induced us to our injury or irreparable harm by a specie of misinformation, disinformation, or a SPECIE OF SILENCE, wherein they have used all manner of colorable officialdom to make false and FRAUDULENT CLAIMS AND ACTIONS against us, personally or against our Lawfully owned property, which is a totally violation of LAW and these Plaintiff(s) damn well knew exactly what was done and by whom!! Please see U.S. vs. Prudden 424 F2d 1021, and U.S. vs. TWEEL, 550 F2d 297 AT 299-300, WHICH CASE HELD " silence can only be equated with FRAUD when there is a legal and moral duty to speak the TRUTH or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading to the injury of the parties."
FURTHER,.. In Re: Dunahay vs. Struik, 393 P 2d 930, (1964) 96 Arizona 246, which case held,...." FRAUD may be committed by a failure to speak when the DUTY, ( RES ipsa loquitur, with exclusive control), of speaking is imposed."
FURTHER,.. In Re: Batty vs. Arizona State Dental Board, 112 { 2d 870, 57 Arizona 239 (1941 case), which held,... " FRAUD may be committed by a failure to speak when the DUTY of speaking is imposed as much as by speaking falsely."
FURTHER,.. In Re: State vs. Coddington, 662 P 2d 115, 113 Arizona 480, Arizona App. (1983 case) which case held,.... " WHEN one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in effect a false and FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION that what is disclosed is the whole truth and nothing but the truth." and one can go on and on,...." Suppression of a material fact which a party is bound in good faith to disclose is equivalent to a false or FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION, thereby inducing me to my great injury, please see Leigh vs. Loyd , 224 P 2d 356, Arizona 84 (1954 case) and further see " WHEN one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the holding back of other facts FRAUD OR DECEIT may arise from silence where the DUTY TO SPEAK THE TRUTH, as well as prohibition from speaking an UNTRUTH existed under the LAW, ALSO FURTHER SEE Morrison vs. Acton, 198 P 2d 590, 68 Arizona 27 , (1948 case), which also supports Leigh v. Loyd SUPRA.
In short these cases go on, and on, and on, so ANY PARTY could be given sufficient NOTICE OR WARNING of activity which would or could be FRAUDULENT and books and books of considerable collections at LAW LIBRARIES speak volumes to this very SUBJECT! Clearly the Plaintiff(s) knew or should have known what they were doing to injure me was wrong, FRAUDULENT, AND UNLAWFUL IN FACT. Now when such activities of misinformation or disinformation or a specie of silence, whose clear purpose is to miss-inform, or dis-inform a party in interest of real facts and Lawful Rights then FRAUD HAS CLEARLY BEEN DONE! Especially if a party has relied in GOOD FAITH on such reliance's to their very great injury, then clear UNLAWFUL, INSTITUTIONAL BAD FAITH HAS IN FACT OCCURRED AND THE GOVERNMENT ENTITY, WHO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH ACTIVITY KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY IS IN BREACH OF THEIR ORIGINAL CIVIC PURPOSE TRUSTEESHIP THEY WERE IN FACT CREATED TO PROTECT AGAINST! THIS IS A BREACH OF FAITH SUBJECTING THE OFFENDING PARTY TO " QUO WARRANTO " OF THEIR INTENDED GOVERNMENTAL ENFRANCHISED POWER OR RIGHTS, which they were originally created under their Corporation CHARTER pursuant to Public Acts 230 & 231 of Public Acts,
HOME RULE, OR CHARTER, for ALL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES and that is just a fact.
WE CLAIM FRAUD AND WE TIMELY OBJECT TO ALL THE FRAUD IN THIS CASE (11U080280) AND FOREWARN THE PARTIES THAT LEGAL ACTION IS EMINENT AND WILL BE COMMENCED VERY SHORTLY IF THIS MATTER IS NOT TIMELY REPAIRED IN TOTAL TO MY COMPLETE SATISFACTION.
FAIR WARNING IS FAIRLY GIVEN!
Posted by Freewill at 9:28 PM
If anyone can translate this (I speak only a little gibberish, and read less), please let me know.
"Follow the Money"
-
notorial dissent
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Don't it just chap your grits when the crazies out crazy you?
I've got to admit that I haven't seen so much sovcit gibberish stupid in one place in a long time. I suspect the court's reply will be a simple NO and Destry will be all twitterpated again.
I've got to admit that I haven't seen so much sovcit gibberish stupid in one place in a long time. I suspect the court's reply will be a simple NO and Destry will be all twitterpated again.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
Jeffrey
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Guys there's news! Freewill's trial was supposed to be on the 22nd, guess what happened:
-
notorial dissent
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Well color me surprised, as in not in the least. This ought to be good for a whole new round of drama.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
Jeffrey
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Managed to get a response from Freewill:
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2016/03/ ... mment-formFreewill, the Alleged Defendant here in before this Honorable Court and formally challenge any and all jurisdiction, PERSONEL AND SUBJECT MATTER AS APPLIED TO freewill, Apostlle No. 104325-1-3042090-194, OR HIS FANILY, please see title 5 u.s. code sections # 557 and # 706, once challenged the plaintiffs must prove jurisdiction HAGENS VS. LAVINE 415 U.S. 528,AT 533 McNUTT V.S. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPT CORP, 56 S.CT 502, because I have been totally denied MY BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF DUE POROCESS OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 5 U.A. CODE SECTION # 557 AND # 706, AND ALL JURISDICTION CEASES BY LAW, EVEN HAD YOU IN FACT PROVEN LAWFUL JURISDICTION, YOU LOST IT BY DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW VIOLATIONS.
-
The Observer
- Further Moderator
- Posts: 7559
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
- Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Darn, does this mean we have to give Freewill his dinars back?
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
-
texino
- Grand Debunker of Medical Quackery
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 3:08 am
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
In regard to "The Pink Pagoda" a large part of Neal Stephenson's "The Diamond Age" deals with the results of the rescue and nurturing of a very large number of female Chinese infants. (a swell book IMO)
ҨTexino₪
Siga el dinero
El camino continúa por siempre, pero el partido nunca termina
texino@gmail.com
Siga el dinero
El camino continúa por siempre, pero el partido nunca termina
texino@gmail.com
-
notorial dissent
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "Freewill" KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
Freewill gets them back for the super duper xtra speshul sovereign citizen rate, twice the price for half the amount. He's such a special snowflake.
At least this time they specified NO BAIL. I wonder if they'll send someone out specifically to get him this time with a special invitation and jewelery?
At least this time they specified NO BAIL. I wonder if they'll send someone out specifically to get him this time with a special invitation and jewelery?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.