I know I keep prattling on about what I think is in the minds of freemen and freemen-lites. But the subject has come up here as to why this thread has anything to do with freemen or sovcits. As we can see by visiting a few freeman friendly forums more than a few freemen are enthralled with the idea that Galati's suit might be a fly in the ointment of Canada's banking system.Burnaby49 wrote:. . .what is stunning about this case isn't that the court decided against COMER's arguments, that was a given. It's that they couldn't get past the first absolutely rock-bottom basic hurdle, filing a Statement of Claim acceptable to the court. . . .
. . .Rocco Galati, a supposedly qualified lawyer and apparently Canada's greatest constitutional expert acting for them, they failed abysmally on their first attempt. And the court patiently explained to them why they failed and gave them a mulligan to try again. But they did just as poor a job the second time around. In other words they couldn't get past the first, and simplest hurdle, of explaining why they had a cause of action that the court could hear. There's no legal failure more basic than that.
In a subculture where futile fillings and empty gestures rise to the level of heroism Galati's sad effort seen as something great. In freemanland Rocco's failure can't be about incompetence and misjudgment, but rather the conspiracies of the powers that be.
It's the freeman way.