rumpelstilzchen wrote:Four or five years ago the footles would have been screaming "Habeas Corpus, Habeas Corpus".
Isn't Habeas Corpus in their box of tricks these days?
The Goofy thread has descended into entirely predictable craziness as they go into frenzied denouncements and, as observed, threats bordering the criminal threshold.
They'll huff, and they'll puff, and they'll ......make a youtoob about it.
Well Rumple at least you can rely upon teddy to stick to the script;
and where is the official wet signed paper work
And a noobie Droog;
People on here need to understand that a magistrates “court” is not a court of justice. It is a court of summary jurisdiction. You cannot get “justice” in that type of “court”.
“They” are trying to break Guy's spirit. (who are THEY?)
After Guy has been released, and should he wish to seek redress against those who have done him wrong, then he needs to file a claim in a proper court of law.
Which proper court would that be I wonder, a question Mr. Fibble asks too.
Last word to teddy who conflates the court as being the work of the insidious Rothschilds whilst relying on good old Lord Denning (who will be spinning in his grave I suspect) to save them;
As there is a serious injustice here and against procedure , Lord Denning said that the magistrates court was not recognised and that any ruling could be quashed with the the void order.
That commercial court can not lawfully hold Guy and is deemed kidnap .
are we to assume that as these herberts in the guise of a court are the new face of tyranny and above any reproach .
The supreme court should surely put these mafia in reverse roles and inside the cells.
should this be the back door to protect the rothschild model as the flaws are too obvious now , they have been content to herd us, as we see the slaughter house then they are ignoring the disguise and whatever it takes to quash the truth of their fraud .
In a truly totalitarian state Guy's period of incarceration would have been a great deal longer than seven days; in the UK only half of any sentence is served in prison so 3.5 days in truth and we wouldn't have camera phones, secure communications, YouTube and public forums in which to vent one's spleen, however disagreeable.
The underlying matter, the one that brought him there in the first place still has to be dealt with but I think they'll deem it time served and leave it at that.