Burnaby49 wrote:
What I can say is that Quatloos and I have been a topic of discussion in British Columbia courts.
So we can say (Menardian style) that Burnaby49 and Quatloos are judicially recognised.
Are these cases to be reported in the sovereign forum or the detaxer forum?
You'll find out when they are posted. It's going to be a while because of the issue of publication bans.
I am currently attending, or trying to attend, five trials. Three have publication bans. These three are entirely separate trials with separate defendants. All have individual publication bans imposed and one has, as I understand it, a second ban imposed because of my presence at trial. Don't bother asking how you can impose a ban on top of a ban, I'm confused myself. Publication bans are automatically lifted at the conclusion of a trial so I could normally publish my report on each trial as soon as a decision is given. However in this situation I can't if I want to include full coverage. A while ago the three defendants had a joint application hearing, a combined trial hearing to resolve a common issue. That hearing is covered by all three bans (or four, or maybe even five, I've lost track) so I can't report on the application hearing for any of them until the last of their trials is concluded. Two may be done in a few months but the third is quite late in the year. I can either wait until the third trial is concluded and include the application hearing in all three write-ups or I can publish the first two as soon they finish by leaving the hearing out. I prefer the former because I think the hearing is significant.
It's enough to drive me to drink if I wasn't already there.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
Burnaby49 wrote:I am currently attending, or trying to attend, five trials. Three have publication bans. These three are entirely separate trials with separate defendants. All have individual publication bans imposed and one has, as I understand it, a second ban imposed because of my presence at trial.
Wow - the observer becomes part of the event. There must be a cat in a box somewhere.
Congratulations, seriously. It's a fine thing that these cheats and phoneys are being journalled.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
Burnaby49 wrote:I am currently attending, or trying to attend, five trials. Three have publication bans. These three are entirely separate trials with separate defendants. All have individual publication bans imposed and one has, as I understand it, a second ban imposed because of my presence at trial.
Wow - the observer becomes part of the event. There must be a cat in a box somewhere.
Congratulations, seriously. It's a fine thing that these cheats and phoneys are being journalled.
As you'll find when I finally report the trial I have become very much a part of the event. I'll save the details until then.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
Burnaby49 wrote:I am currently attending, or trying to attend, five trials. Three have publication bans. These three are entirely separate trials with separate defendants. All have individual publication bans imposed and one has, as I understand it, a second ban imposed because of my presence at trial.
Wow - the observer becomes part of the event. There must be a cat in a box somewhere.
Congratulations, seriously. It's a fine thing that these cheats and phoneys are being journalled.
Damn, that's what I love about Quatloos! We should start a new drinking game involving having to take a drink every time you can mention Schrodinger's Cat in normal conversation. Special awards to those who can invoke the Pauli Exclusion Principal to prove that two FMOTL cannot occupy the same court case simultaneously.
... Sorry bad day at work with my porcine ladies.
Special awards to those who can invoke the Pauli Exclusion Principal to prove that two FMOTL cannot occupy the same court case simultaneously.
... Sorry bad day at work with my porcine ladies.
Your theory is easily disproven. I was in a courtroom with three of them. Athough I suppose it depends on your meaning. While they physically occupied the same courtroom, there were three separate cases.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
bmxninja357 wrote:But how many persons were involved in the three opca?
We're not going there. One physical body counts as one person.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
LordEd wrote:So we can say (Menardian style) that Burnaby49 and Quatloos are judicially recognised.
Are these cases to be reported in the sovereign forum or the detaxer forum?
I think I've worked out some of the cases. Possibly KL, MM, and/or DA as some of the names?
And LF and AD and another guy whose name I've forgotten. I've been in Palm Springs for two weeks so I have to reconnect.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
Time to stop all this gabbling about court hearings and get back on topic. Me and my problems with real ale.
I've PM'd everybody who responded to my plaintive cry for drinking companions (even though I'm bringing one with me) suggesting dates and locations. So check and if you don't have a PM, or want to add yourself to the roster of pathetic drunks, let me know. If you have a PM we'll see what we can work out.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
guilty wrote:Burnaby, I am unable to attend any of your ale-tasting events, but please do add me to the roster of pathetic drunks. Do I get a badge?
A badge? You people are going to start demanding swag-bags next. You want to be considered as pathetic a drunken old wreck as Burnaby49? Then get you ass of the couch in front of your TV set and go do the work. When you've had at least one beer at a thousand British and Irish pubs get back to me. And that's a thousand different pubs. Going to your local every day for three years only counts as one.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
You disappoint me. I thought you would have at least worked in a reference to "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre" and told him he didn't need any stinkin' badges.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
mufc1959 wrote:Meanwhile in Canada something strange is going on ...
Just someone being silly, nothing to see here folks, please move along. It's simply a little known "feature" in Google Maps where they thought it would be a good idea to go all wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Map_Maker
