![Shrug :shrug:](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Ta.
Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean
Well, let's see - although anyone of normal intelligence has had enough examples by now to have figured it out. First of all, it's probably best to avoid stuff like this:pigpot wrote:What do you want me to do Wes?
Or this:Just remember flashing curtains next door. Lights off and on. Long haired "Yetis" at the window checking what I'm up to. The children of a Freemasonic family NEXT DOOR! They make me laugh. :lol: :haha: I'm ready for the next visit (hopefully for the little b1tch ass pile of sh1te will NEVER SHOW AGAIN) but the if the filth show again they'll get the same message... PLUS ONE!
Or this:That's where I'm at. I laughed at two cops who I told to piss of from my front door the other week. I thought when I was at my front door I'd stepped into a pantomime with these couple of idiots in fancy dress. I can only hope they never visit again (not that I give a shit either way) but if they do I'll have a proposition for them, it's called, "Which badge is real competition?" It works like this... They get to throw their badge at me and I get to throw my badge at them. At the end of the competition we agree with whose badge hurt more after being thrown, as in whose badge was more REAL. Who can throw it the hardest in essence
Or this:Picking at things...
"General warrant", "no particularity" ... "4th Amendment". Rights from unreasonable searches and seizures. "Had it been a filing cabinet"...
What a hoot! It's all sh1te!
Are you getting the picture?Ho ho! How I laughed at what you typed "rumps"... :haha: :sarcasmon: My God you are boring. Do you have a family? Are they all boring like you?
It wouldn't matter. pigpot at that point would at the point claim that this is just proof that the courts are corrupt, that the statists will never allow a case like this to win, and so forth.Arthur Rubin wrote:It's not easy for someone without access to a legal service to Shepardize a case. I think I'd give him any appellate court case where the HOLDING in the case supports his premise, until we point to where it was overturned.
That would be a start.pigpot wrote:What do you want me to do Wes? Do you want me to agree that Nations and States exist and that they have jurisdiction? Just let me know what you'd like me to agree to.![]()
Ta.
I've been here over 10 years now, and they haven't banned me yet, so they must not have too many rules....its like Groucho Marx says, 'I'd never join any club that would admit me"Pottapaug1938 wrote:People really need to sink beneath and below the standards of conduct here, repeatedly and after many warnings, before they get banned -- quite unlike the wackadooster sites, where the slightest hint of heresy is grounds for banning. In my 7 years here, I can only remember one or two people meriting (de-meriting?) this drastic step.
piggy, I assume that you don't live on the street or in a cave and you have a front door of some sort? Your front door has been placed where an imaginary line has been drawn on a map. That line doesn't really exist, it only exists in everybody's imagination. Now a few questions for you. Is everyone in the world allowed to cross your threshold without your permission or do you believe you can choose who can and who cannot step foot over that imaginary line drawn on a map? Do you believe you have the authority to use force to stop someone from coming through the door? Do you expect other people to accept the existence of that imaginary line? If you believe you have the right to prevent anyone from crossing that imaginary line please tell me where you obtain that authority from.pigpot wrote: Do you want me to agree that Nations and States exist and that they have jurisdiction?
I'm not going to bow to you. I'll tell you though where your going wrong though. Shush and be quiet about it... It's simply this. It's no more than this. In a voluntary world, your world view doesn't exist and therefore doesn't need to be accommodated as no-one is fighting (and if any are they are dismissed by those that want to get on). Your world is all about fighting and sh1te, but in the adult / real world, we don't won't to to fight. Easy as. Job done.... sortedrumpelstilzchen wrote:piggy, I assume that you don't live on the street or in a cave and you have a front door of some sort? Your front door has been placed where an imaginary line has been drawn on a map. That line doesn't really exist, it only exists in everybody's imagination. Now a few questions for you. Is everyone in the world allowed to cross your threshold without your permission or do you believe you can choose who can and who cannot step foot over that imaginary line drawn on a map? Do you believe you have the authority to use force to stop someone from coming through the door? Do you expect other people to accept the existence of that imaginary line? If you believe you have the right to prevent anyone from crossing that imaginary line please tell me where you obtain that authority from.pigpot wrote: Do you want me to agree that Nations and States exist and that they have jurisdiction?
We don't live in a voluntary world so that's all moot.In a voluntary world
piggy, you quoted my questions but you didn't answer them. That's not very polite is it now? If you are going to quote my questions you should at least have the decency to answer them. You told us you can beat anyone in a debate and you have fallen at the first hurdle. Oh....I get it now.....you think avoiding questions and posting gibberish is the way to win a debate. Come on, piggy don't run away from the questions of mine that you quoted. Let's talk about that imaginary line drawn on a map where your front door is sat.pigpot wrote:I'm not going to bow to you. I'll tell you though where your going wrong though. Shush and be quiet about it... It's simply this. It's no more than this. In a voluntary world, your world view doesn't exist and therefore doesn't need to be accommodated as no-one is fighting (and if any are they are dismissed by those that want to get on). Your world is all about fighting and sh1te, but in the adult / real world, we don't won't to to fight. Easy as. Job done.... sortedrumpelstilzchen wrote:piggy, I assume that you don't live on the street or in a cave and you have a front door of some sort? Your front door has been placed where an imaginary line has been drawn on a map. That line doesn't really exist, it only exists in everybody's imagination. Now a few questions for you. Is everyone in the world allowed to cross your threshold without your permission or do you believe you can choose who can and who cannot step foot over that imaginary line drawn on a map? Do you believe you have the authority to use force to stop someone from coming through the door? Do you expect other people to accept the existence of that imaginary line? If you believe you have the right to prevent anyone from crossing that imaginary line please tell me where you obtain that authority from.pigpot wrote: Do you want me to agree that Nations and States exist and that they have jurisdiction?
No, we have chosen to not live in the voluntary world that exists. pigpot, like many other sovrun/freeman types, believes that this voluntary world is a utopia where they can escape the evils of statism. Unfortunately, the voluntary world is a natural world where every person can do as they please, even if it means to do so to the detriment of their fellow man. It is the brutish and short life that Hobbes described, a life that none of these sovrun types have ever experienced. If they were ever forced out of the statist society that they live in and benefit by into the voluntary world, none of them would ever dare to mention the subject again - if they were fortunate enough to survive it.Jeffrey wrote:We don't live in a voluntary world so that's all moot.