There's a time and a plaice for joking aroundFirthy2002 wrote:Stop codding around!Dr. Caligari wrote:Stop, you're giving me a haddock.Chaos wrote:
sounds a little fishy right?
...I'll get me coat...

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
There's a time and a plaice for joking aroundFirthy2002 wrote:Stop codding around!Dr. Caligari wrote:Stop, you're giving me a haddock.Chaos wrote:
sounds a little fishy right?
...I'll get me coat...
You want a mountain of tripe? Read on, its hilarious. Britain has a constitution, American law and it's Courts decisions apply in the UK and we even get a fee schedule as an added bonus, this piece of guff made me laugh a lot, enjoy.Hercule Parrot wrote:Have you seen this mountain of tripe? https://www.dropbox.com/s/7tkq631l455vo ... 6.pdf?dl=0JamesVincent wrote:Why is it that maroons that say."let me be clear" then launch into 5,000 words of unclear, irrelevant and WTFing of word salad?
Abalone!katiHWB wrote:There's a time and a plaice for joking aroundFirthy2002 wrote:Stop codding around!Dr. Caligari wrote:
Stop, you're giving me a haddock.
...I'll get me coat...
Only fair I guess, seems a good share of our idjits seem to think, and I use the term loosely, that the Queen still owns us rules, that the British BAR runs everything legal over here through some secret contract or compact, and that the City of London controls all our finances, and that the Pope is lord and master over all.Skeleton wrote:You want a mountain of tripe? Read on, its hilarious. Britain has a constitution, American law and it's Courts decisions apply in the UK and we even get a fee schedule as an added bonus, this piece of guff made me laugh a lot, enjoy.Hercule Parrot wrote:Have you seen this mountain of tripe? https://www.dropbox.com/s/7tkq631l455vo ... 6.pdf?dl=0JamesVincent wrote:Why is it that maroons that say."let me be clear" then launch into 5,000 words of unclear, irrelevant and WTFing of word salad?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5d0b4k2br1kps ... 1.odt?dl=0
If they don't, they should.Master Tom of the house: Boyce
Notice of Complaint and Offer of Conditional Acceptance
None of the 3 pages had any wet ink signatures
https://www.facebook.com/Baron.david.wa ... 9801577114Formally as of 4pm today we are formally in contempt of court.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
My formal response to this is Zzzzzzzzzzzzz
We have been given a court order by Deputy District Judge Woodward to vacate our Home and hand over possession to the Ex Partner. If we disobey this court Order then we MAY be held in contempt of court and go to jail.
Really.... Zzzzzzzzzzzz
Formally as of 4pm today we are formally in contempt of court.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
My formal response to this is Zzzzzzzzzzzzz
We have been given a court order by Deputy District Judge Woodward to vacate our Home and hand over possession to the Ex Partner. If we disobey this court Order then we MAY be held in contempt of court and go to jail.
Really.... Zzzzzzzzzzzz
How is it that we can be so flippant? Unconcerned; nonchalant: had a blasé attitude.
We are ecstatic about the fact that we are in contempt of court.
We are formally falling about the floor laughing our tits off.
We can feel the shock and horror as people read this.
Why is it that we can be so flippant?
Simple... This is so simple. 99.999% of people will not see the wood for the trees.
This is a civil matter. Any implementation of force in a civil matter “IS” a wilful and belligerent act of terrorism by default.
No Force can be used. I can’t be arrested or imprisoned.
THIS IS A CIVIL MATTER.
What in the Blue blazes am I going on about?
OK. Here are Examples current and observable today.
1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/Woolsto ... ctioncamp/
This camp is guilty of aggravated trespass on Peel land and have been from day one.
There has been no legal argument presented to contest this fact.
Peel Holdings which is a HUGE MF company did make an application in the Chancery High Court for an eviction Order and Lord Norris GRANTED and gave an order of eviction. Clearly the Campers ARE in contempt of Court and have blatantly disobeyed Lord Norris and his Chancery Court Order. This is no Mickey Mouse Family Court with a Deputy Judge.
Why are they still here 18 months or more after the event?????? No enforcement or use of force!!
WTF is going on??
THIS IS A CIVIL MATTER. No force can be used or implemented. Any use of force WOULD BE a Blatant and belligerent act of terrorism.
Is it really this simple? YES IT IS.
2. Barton Moss.....
GMP acted outside of the jurisdictional boundaries “BY” Acting as a private escort to a Private company that has Private access on a PUBLIC footpath. What was the outcome. Over 160 Criminal charges in the criminal High Court Found Not guilty. This coast GMP Millions and the claims for damages are still being processed t this day. Sir Peter Fahy is no longer chief of police for GMP.
Whooooooo
Is this a Civil Matter? Well yes as there was no criminal intent.
In a Civil Matter... There can be NO use of force. Any use of force would be a belligerent act of terrorism.
3. In January this year there was two criminal warrants for my arrest. I still do not have a clue what the second was for. I wilfully refused to divulge my financial details to Warrington Borough Council. Tough Dodo WBC you can smoke my brown ring. Is this a civil matter? Yes it is.... I sent a 177 page duplex printed report to Chief of police for Cheshire, Chief Constable, Mr Simon Byrne. This was just a factual report. I never requested any action taken by Mr Simon Byrne. HMCTS Runcorn have been silenced. No further documents or attempts to arrest me to this day. I still don’t pay Council Tax.
Is this a CIVIL matter?? Hell yes....
Can force be implemented in a civil matter? Hell No. This would be a belligerent act of terrorism.
The Chief of police carries an obligation in his office to suppress a belligerent act of terrorism UNDER HIS JURISDICTION. Does the HMCTS office come under the Chief of police Jurisdiction?? Hell Yes.
Does the Family Court come under the Chief of police Jurisdiction? Hell yes. Does the Crown Court come under the Chief of Police Jurisdiction. HELL YES. Does the Chancery High Court come under the Chief of Police Jurisdiction?? HELL YES all of it does as well as the Queens Bench.
Do I give a red monkeys arse that I am formally in Contempt of Deputy District Judge Woodward Court Order.
FOR FUCK SAKE HELL NOoooooooooooo
Zzzzzzzzzz
Is it that simple.....Yes.
Has this been overlooked by all the freemen on the land and the Sovereigns, Common Law wankers? Do the Blind and the stupid lead the blind and the stupid???
I keep Chief of Police Mr Simon Byrne up to speed by email.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Which do we think is most likely?I sent a 177 page duplex printed report to Chief of police for Cheshire, Chief Constable, Mr Simon Byrne.
I keep Chief of Police Mr Simon Byrne up to speed by email.
It is from LurkerRob's link:notorial dissent wrote:Rumple, WHERE and WHEN was this posted?
Also, none of the arresting officers were prosecuted for terrorism.JamesVincent wrote:Pretty sure you can do time for contempt in a civil matter. Otherwise there'd be a lot of deadbeats that wouldn't have gone to jail for things like child support.
I had a quick search and I think the court can bring a contempt charge against him for ignoring the court order - the order having come from a Crown Court or higher court means it can bring its own charges for contempt. Max 2 years and unlimited (not too sure) fines. That is a criminal charge too, ignoring the court in a civil matter isn't a civil matter.JamesVincent wrote:Pretty sure you can do time for contempt in a civil matter. Otherwise there'd be a lot of deadbeats that wouldn't have gone to jail for things like child support.
I think he's likely to find out just how wrong he can be.ArthurWankspittle wrote:I had a quick search and I think the court can bring a contempt charge against him for ignoring the court order - the order having come from a Crown Court or higher court means it can bring its own charges for contempt. Max 2 years and unlimited (not too sure) fines. That is a criminal charge too, ignoring the court in a civil matter isn't a civil matter.JamesVincent wrote:Pretty sure you can do time for contempt in a civil matter. Otherwise there'd be a lot of deadbeats that wouldn't have gone to jail for things like child support.
As I understand it treating the orders or rulings of any court with contempt is contempt of court which can can you jailed. What matters is the wanton disregard of the court's orders not the seniority of the court involved. These morons think you can't be jailed for contempt of a civil court... They are wrong.ArthurWankspittle wrote:I had a quick search and I think the court can bring a contempt charge against him for ignoring the court order - the order having come from a Crown Court or higher court means it can bring its own charges for contempt. Max 2 years and unlimited (not too sure) fines. That is a criminal charge too, ignoring the court in a civil matter isn't a civil matter.JamesVincent wrote:Pretty sure you can do time for contempt in a civil matter. Otherwise there'd be a lot of deadbeats that wouldn't have gone to jail for things like child support.