Crikey. Just for a moment there I thought they'd scored some top-flight entertainment in one of the best Ska band ever - what a coup!letissier14 wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad936/ad936d2fa76d26dfb6e895d9222a299a8eb062e7" alt="Image"
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Crikey. Just for a moment there I thought they'd scored some top-flight entertainment in one of the best Ska band ever - what a coup!letissier14 wrote:
Hardly, Buster Bloodvessel has some talent and is better looking.exiledscouser wrote:Crikey. Just for a moment there I thought they'd scored some top-flight entertainment in one of the best Ska band ever - what a coup!
20 of those 35 who turned up were Admin and health and safetyArthurWankspittle wrote:
So 50,000 members, permission sought for 350 people and 35 turn up. Here have an apt smilie:
According to the blurb on this - http://www.eventgoat.co.uk/bishop-auckl ... fest-2016/, the venue itself cost £900 to hire.letissier14 wrote:
20 of those 35 who turned up were Admin and health and safety![]()
That makes sense - most of them need a (child) minder aka H&S officialletissier14 wrote:
20 of those 35 who turned up were Admin and health and safety![]()
letissier14 wrote:Hilarious drunken video threat from a senior admin member of btbab from Wakfest
https://www.facebook.com/colin.potter.7 ... 438311684/![]()
I think they predicted 350 attendees according to the notice to Bolton Council which is why the allocation of tickets was strictly limited.YiamCross wrote:I don't see the point in mocking their party, though of course the fact that they were predicting 50,000 and ended up with what looks like well short of 50.
They started a lot higher and were still talking thousands when they were applying with estimates of low hundreds. Assuming they issued all 350 tickets it was a pretty poor turnout which in itself says a lot about what people really think of them.Pox wrote:
I think they predicted 350 attendees according to the notice to Bolton Council which is why the allocation of tickets was strictly limited.
Because they need an enemy. They need a group who they can point to and say, when this went wrong it was the fault of these people and not because of what we told you to do. Although there is something rather strange about a secret society that seems to be devoted to bringing down secret societies and is very selective about who gets to join its ranks because they don't want anyone who might be in a secret society in their secret society.YiamCross wrote: What confuses me is why they had to make out that secrecy was so important. I'm also impressed how deeply they feel the need to demonstrate their disdain for us. Along with the need to cloak their activities in secrecy they surely exhibit a deep fear of the facts we throw at them. If they're so sure of their position why don't they invite the Quatloos Debating and Education Squad to attend for a formal debate? I'm sure they wouldn't get off their faces and resort to violence when their ideas are ripped to shreds with facts and reason. After all, as we can see from their group photo, they're all about love.