Moderator: Burnaby49
True; but Allen-baby will need a lot of money to buy the paper with which to print all of that legal copypasta. Somehow, I think that he won't have quite enough of that....SteveUK wrote:Those government agents will be regretting the day they muttered 'Boisjoli'. Think of all the liens and copyright infringement notes he'll have to cook up. There's hardly enough trees in the rainforest to print all of that gibberish.
PeaceEdmonton city police charge Freeman on the Land with 'paper terrorism'
This is a big deal. Congratulations to Allen.This is the first time in Canada that law enforcement officials have laid a ‘paper terrorism’ charge against an individual claiming to be a Freeman on the Land.
theSovereign1 wrote:
psychopathic control freaks like you believe people are not free to beat their wivesor vice versa
Yes but you are free to beat your wife. Doesn't mean you won't go to jail for itLordEd wrote:theSovereign1 wrote:
psychopathic control freaks like you believe people are not free to beat their wivesor vice versa
Here's a freeman who thinks that it's allowable to beat one's spouse. . .the logical conclusion being that he believes a spouse loses his or her right to self protection upon marrying.LordEd wrote:Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
theSovereign1 wrote:
psychopathic control freaks like you believe people are not free to beat their wivesor vice versa
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/ ... -1.3772454A video published in 2015 to Boisjoli's Youtube account captured the audio of the officer giving him a ticket for driving 105 km/h in a 80-km/h zone. In it, Boisjoli can be heard questioning the legitimacy of speeding laws.
"It's not a crime," Boisjoli said in the video. "What you're doing is fraud, it's corporate statue policies, and it doesn't apply to me."
I'd say, at a maximum, there are one-tenth that number.He described the group as loosely organized, and estimated there are about 30,000 so-called Freemen across Canada.
That section says;Boisjoli has been charged under Section 423.1 (1) of the Criminal Code. The maximum penalty for that offence is a prison term of up to 14 years.
Intimidation of a justice system participant or a journalist
423.1 (1) No person shall, without lawful authority, engage in any conduct with the intent to provoke a state of fear in
(a) a group of persons or the general public in order to impede the administration of criminal justice;
(b) a justice system participant in order to impede him or her in the performance of his or her duties; or
(c) a journalist in order to impede him or her in the transmission to the public of information in relation to a criminal organization
That might explain Belanger getting arrested about the same time. Time to round them up."We tolerated the Freemen and the Sovereign Citizens to a certain extent," he said. "And now that level of tolerance has come to an end. We want to make it clear that if people are going to continue engaging in this type of behaviour, then we are going to robustly investigate and bring these people to court."
I think all the freeman pseudo-legal filings filings are nothing more than time consuming vexatiousness.LordEd wrote:I think it's misleading to say he's been charged with 'paper terrorism'. The freemen sheep don't read much beyond the headline and will think some new law was created because they were on to something.
Actually not quite even a traffic cop technically speaking, although I suspect the female voice at the end was an RCMP member. He was stopped initially by a Community Peace Officer, who are peace officers employed by a local jurisdiction, (county or municipality) to enforce certain municipal, provincial, or federal statutes. Before going all freeman on the poor guy Boisjoli should have investigated whether the CPO even had jurisdiction. The rules under which CPO's operate to enforce the Highway Traffic Act are interesting in that regard . As an example, a CPO hired by a town to enforce traffic safety only has jurisdiction within the confines of that town, must be performing duties as described in the town's Traffic Safety Plan, and the TSP must be current (within the last 3 years) and on file with the province and satisfy the province's standards. How does this work in practice? I can't get stopped by a "county mountie" on Highway 72 a mile from my house since the highway designation is two digits and the speed limit is greater than 80 kph, but I could get stopped a little further along on Highway 566 since it has a three digit designation, but the same speed limit. <grins>arayder wrote: But, IMHO, Boisjoli crossed the line when he tried to issued a $225,000 lien against the traffic cop who gave him a speeding ticket.
Can you explain what the difference is between a two digit and a three digit designation?eric wrote: I can't get stopped by a "county mountie" on Highway 72 a mile from my house since the highway designation is two digits and the speed limit is greater than 80 kph, but I could get stopped a little further along on Highway 566 since it has a three digit designation, but the same speed limit. <grins>
Yes, I am amazed at the freeman propensity for fighting on ground so completely unfavorable to them. Of course, arguing that CPOs are outside their jurisdiction infers that they have a jurisdiction in the first place.eric wrote:. . . Before going all freeman on the poor guy Boisjoli should have investigated whether the CPO even had jurisdiction. . .arayder wrote: But, IMHO, Boisjoli crossed the line when he tried to issued a $225,000 lien against the traffic cop who gave him a speeding ticket.
Single digit numbered highways in Alberta - the QE 2 - are owned, operated, and maintained by the province and ther RCMP and provincial sheriffs have jurisdiction. Two digit highways, all of the above except maintenance may be done on a shared basis with counties. Community peace officers usually only have jurisdiction in a defined geographic area on 2 digit highways and where the speed limit is 80 km or lower and all of the above must be in an approved traffic safety plan. Three digit highways are maintained mainly by the county, the county mounties have jurisdiction no matter the speed limit, but they have to be performing activities mentioned in the traffic safety plan. As an example, in the county where I live, a few years back, photo radar speed traps were a real money maker until some lawyer, with multiple speeding tickets, realized that what they were doing hadn't been approved by the province in the TSP. Besides, at times they were putting speed traps on 2 digit numbered highways with a speed limit of 90. If you really want to slog through all the details, here is a link to the policy and procedure manual for the employment of community peace officers.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Can you explain what the difference is between a two digit and a three digit designation?eric wrote: I can't get stopped by a "county mountie" on Highway 72 a mile from my house since the highway designation is two digits and the speed limit is greater than 80 kph, but I could get stopped a little further along on Highway 566 since it has a three digit designation, but the same speed limit. <grins>
An followed due process an gained some respect instead of making real freeman look like Asshat`s.
Then there are other members here that try to say this bull shit.
Thinking what you say about Canada is right and Coning Canadians into believing that you are somehow a real Canadian Freeman and that you represent the ideals of a Canadian Freeman,= oxymoron as Canada is a said Corporation an one can not blong to A corporation an be a freeman at the same time...
You`re either A corporate Body Or you`re a Freeman = Which are U..+Get a grip before you slip an go down like a bunch of bowling pins ...
Well you know what...Most of you haven`t got a fucking clue as to what living as freeman is all about,nor could you do it.
We ain`t brag n ,however come on get you`re right step right or get the fuck off the stage, Whats happened with this case is this dude in the article has learned nothing in !0 years an has rolled the clock back 10 years...An then he sits an wonder`s why he;`s in the clink..
What did he prove to his fellow alleged Freeman ...How too label most as an Idiot definition, Informal. an utterly foolish or senseless person. That what.
I wait with trepidation to see how the collapse of the goverment will affect my pension.Entertainment has value.
I'm in the process of removing an entire government.
A first in Canada.