Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

[notorial dissent]

Can't help wondering what broke up that little love fest.

[Colin123]

They are claiming that Ashley Hall the "quatoos Stalker" has been sent down for 5 months

Jay Brad is bragging on the facebook group Fremman Fails

https://www.facebook.com/groups/FREEMANONTHELANDFAILS/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc2DAyJ ... e=youtu.be

[Burnaby49]

I have the same request as Robert Menard. If he's a Quatloos poster what name did he post under?

[Colin123]

I have the same request as Robert Menard. If he's a Quatloos poster what name did he post under?

I don't think he is a member of Quatloos, It is just what Bradley calls anyone he disagrees with him, Or thinks Tom's house wasn't "stolen"

[exiledscouser]

Jay Brad is bragging on the facebook group Fremman Fails

He's rejoicing that the troll, whoever it might be may possibly post here. Jay Brad, no stranger to prison himself is a self-admitted poster on Quatloos himself, ironically enough.

It also appears from the banter on that same site that Jay has been caught erm.. 'playing away' with his wife's niece, a young lady of **ahem** tender years which has led to some difficult times in the Bradley household and an eviction of sorts of his very own at the hands of the fearsome current Mrs B.

Another disappointment - standards are slipping here on Q!

[SoLongCeylon]

They are claiming that Ashley Hall the "quatoos Stalker" has been sent down for 5 months

Jay Brad is bragging on the facebook group Fremman Fails

https://www.facebook.com/groups/FREEMANONTHELANDFAILS/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc2DAyJ ... e=youtu.be

Those three "wise men" seem very smug outside the corrupt court they despise. Seeing as they mention Quatloos so much it is obvious they read these boards here is a message: Tom, you're a stupid old fool and you threw your house away. Nothing you say is correct, none of your earth shattering revellations ever come to anything, you have let your family down and what little remaining support you have is trash. However, more than all that Tom, you have kept us all amused for months and months - all at your great expense.

[Hercule Parrot]

They are claiming that Ashley Hall the "quatoos Stalker" has been sent down for 5 months

Don't recognise the name, but if he's one of ours then HQ will take care of it. Booked in through the front gates of the jail, straight out of the back door and a ride home in the Governor's car.

[The Observer]

Tom, you're a stupid old fool and you threw your house away. Nothing you say is correct, none of your earth shattering revellations ever come to anything, you have let your family down and what little remaining support you have is trash. However, more than all that Tom, you have kept us all amused for months and months - all at your great expense.

Not to mention his negligent mishandling of Betty and losing her during the whole fiasco.

[rumpelstilzchen]

Do we know what the defendant was found to be guilty of?

[rumpelstilzchen]

They are claiming that Ashley Hall the "quatoos Stalker" has been sent down for 5 months

According to the video it was twenty weeks suspended.

[rumpelstilzchen]

Tom, please tell us what name this person uses on Quatloos.

[ArthurWankspittle]

As Burnaby said, I too don't recognise the name so would the FMOTL types please tell us what name they post under.
Also, I've seen somewhere it was 5 month suspended not 5 month jail.

[exiledscouser]

As Burnaby said, I too don't recognise the name so would the FMOTL types please tell us what name they post under.
Also, I've seen somewhere it was 5 month suspended not 5 month jail.

Arthur - please don't let the Troofer get in the way of a good story!

[LordEd]

As Burnaby said, I too don't recognise the name so would the FMOTL types please tell us what name they post under.
Also, I've seen somewhere it was 5 month suspended not 5 month jail.

Aha it was you! Only the guilty would know details like that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2xlQaimsGg

[letissier14]

As far as I'm aware Ashley Hall doesn't use Quatloos, only Facebook

[aesmith]

Just noticed his FOI request from January. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... _cpr_rules

More attempted nick picking about fees and seals and similar irrelevant nonsense, but presumably this relates to his latest "ground breaking information".

Breaches of the CPR rules I believe makes claims null and void and the court cannot proceed as this also nullifies the jurisdiction of the court, I need this clarified by the Ministry of Justice in the following 5 questions and please answer in detail ALL! of the 5 questions.

[TheNewSaint]

2. If a claim has been started in the County Court and a fee has not been paid and the claimant is not entitled to fee remission, if that case continued would the proceedings be null and void and the claim dismissed when discovered.

Tom Crawford should know this from his very own court case, which is quoted in this very thread:

91. [Mr Crawford] : In my skeleton argument we’ve never received an application, that is a fact, for a
possession. Neither the court, nor Bradford & Bingley have ever produced evidence that a
fee has been paid and there has been no notice of issue. And that can be confirmed by I
think …
92. Mr Justice Phillips : But here we’re not concerned are we with the issuing or the fees,
what we’re concerned with is what the court order was.
93. Mr Crawford : Yes I think we (inaudible).
94. Mr Justice Phillips : Order for possession …
95. Mr Crawford : Nothing can start unless a fee has been paid and it’s been registered in the
court.
96. Mr Justice Phillips : Well the court can make an order without a fee being paid.
97. Mr Crawford : So I can come in and put in claims and … for nothing?
98. Mr Justice Phillips : Well no, because the court will normally require you to pay a fee,
but it doesn’t have to.
99. Mr Crawford : Right so are you telling me Sir that Bradford & Bingley have got this
facility that they can issue documents into the court and claims (inaudible).
100. Mr Justice Phillips : No my understanding is that they paid by credit card.
101. Mr Crawford : My understanding is that …
102. Mr Justice Phillips : I don’t understand how any of this helps you because at the end of
the day none of this makes the court’s order invalid, but even if it did, your remedy would
be to appeal, wouldn’t it?

He's already received an explanation from a judge, in relation to his own case, as to why he's wrong.

I like that the government clerk basically told him to get stuffed. It's the only response he deserves at this point.

[doublelong]

I find it unbelievable that he is still pursuing this line. Godsmark touched on this as well pointing out that it would be impossible to proceed without payment on PCOL. It’s funny how he has never once sort clarification on where his endowment policy went, which after all was his original argument.

[Colin123]

More rubbish



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTH6s8JYe6I

[littleFred]

Rubbish indeed.

Tom has been chasing documents. The CPS don't have a copy of the warrant obtained by the bank for possession of No 3 Fern Chase, and similar documents.

Well, no, they wouldn't. That was a civil matter, and no concern of the CPS.

But Tom foolishly believes that this proves the warrant doesn't exist, and never did exist (even though images of the warrant have been published), so his eviction was unlawful.

Even if he was correct that there was no warrant (and he's not correct), he wouldn't get the house back, because of the possession order.

EDIT: I should add that I'm personally saddened by Tom's appearance and manner in this video.