Exaggerations in the Brown case? Never...

[Demosthenes]

Letter from the dog walker.

mr keith,

thank you for your letter it made my day. as you know i was captured by the enemy on sept 12th. i have been deprived of my liberty ever since. i fired my first lawyer mark howard. i believe he was more on the feds side then ours. i been trying to represent myself and have been filing motions. you can see the motions at danielrileyid.blogspot.com . the feds have filed a motion to strike all my motions because they were not signed by a B.A.R. lawyer. i have a 6th amendment right to represent myself but the enemy is stopping me from doing that at every turn.
on 10/26 i was told i had court. i told the marshalls i had court on 10/29 not today and that i had no prior notice and was not prepared for court today. i asked why wasnt i given notice? the marshall replied it was asecret court date for security reasons. i said i am not going. you are gonna have to use force to get me out of the law library (5'x6' room w/computer) because thisis a violation of my 5th amendment due process rights. they left and came back with 20 guys. they shot me 14 times with a paintball gun with pepper powder in the bullets. i was then beat up and in the process they pulled my right arm out of the socket. i was thrown in the van and driven to portland maine the whole time i was in severe pain, bleeding and my shoulder burning w/ pain. during the secret proceeding i excercised my 5th amendment right to remein silent. they appointed me another B.A.R. esquire and i objected, to no avail. my new lawye is sven wiberg his emal is sven@criminaldefense.com drop him a message, something like

subject: daniel riley
message: this patriot deserves the best defense you can muster. he is a true american and needs our help.

something to that effect. put his email address out on the web so more like minded people can send messages. my last lawyer told me he received death threats. i do not encourage that. i also had a writ of habeous corpus pending in the NH supreme court. the issue revolves around jurisdiction. the feds have non. no criminal jurisdiction that is. i researched this thoroughly and have found the enemy uses old roman contract law to prey on the american people. their charges are nothing more than demands. when you enter a plea at the arraignment you give them jurisdiction via a contract. its messed up. the case becomes a civil criminal case. its like saying that is hot cold ice cream. its not possible but yet they get away with it. i nevr wanted to plea at my arraignment and told my lawyer tha. he said he would have me released in a week if i went along with his plan. mark howard pleaded not guilty after i told him i did not want to plea at all. BAM! jurisdiction is established. i have filed a motion to withdraw my plea stating it was involuntay, coerced,and unknowingly made, which it was. another way they get jurisdiction is by accepting one of their british accreditation regency corporation esquires. i have refused this the whole way yet they kee appointing me one. the whole thing is a fraud and criminal in nature, yet they make me out to be a criminal, wha a joke!
i heard bob wolffe took a plea. that means he is going to testify against us. i am looking at 18 years. the sacrifice i have made for my country is tremendous. i just hope it is not in vain. all 6 of us have made great sacrifices. bob had to plea to protect his wife. i do not blame him, but now my future looks dimmer!
i was only in max for 4 days. no charges were filed against me. i am in what they call a pod. there is 20 other guys, 2 showers, 3 picinic tables, 12 cells, 2 to a cell. when your not locked in your cell you are allowed out into what is called a day room . chess, monopoly, checkers, cards, scrabble, are some of the games. we are locked in midnight till 5:30 am/ 6:45 till 8 am/ noon till 1pm/ 2:45 till 3:30 pm/ and 6pm till 7pm. the rest of the time you are allowed in the dayroom. no outside.
keith i do not want any money sent to me but thanks for the offer. i do not need stamps , but again thanks. keith you are a true patriot. you are part of the patriot family. everyone has their role to play in saving our republic. tell elaine I LOVE HER, we did the best we could! we sacrificed for the greater cause. keith take care.

P.O.W.
Daniel Riley

[grixit]

Hmm, he's living better than Gene Chapman.

[Nikki]

Re: Self-representation.

Please reference the recent denial of the "beltway sniper" appeal of his conviction (and death sentence) for multiple murders.

He had the temerity to appeal on the grounds that he was clearly incapable (which is true) of conducting his own defense (which he did with standby counsel who he wouldn't speak to) and that the Judge was derelict in not conducting sufficient testing / research to properly identify this inadequacy.

One of the highlights of the appeals court's decision was the direct comparison of him to Jack The Ripper.

[The Observer]

as you know i was captured by the enemy on sept 12th.

Well, why were you in the enemy's territory? A really smart patriot would have stayed very far away from the enemy.

the feds have filed a motion to strike all my motions because they were not signed by a B.A.R. lawyer.

It could have been worse - you could have gotten shot by a BAR.

i said i am not going. you are gonna have to use force to get me out of the law library (5'x6' room w/computer) because thisis a violation of my 5th amendment due process rights. they left and came back with 20 guys. they shot me 14 times with a paintball gun with pepper powder in the bullets. i was then beat up and in the process they pulled my right arm out of the socket.

Uh, you told them what to do. So why are you acting suprised that they did it?

i excercised my 5th amendment right to remein silent. they appointed me another B.A.R. esquire and i objected, to no avail.

If you were silent, how did you object - by shaking your head vigorously?

i researched this thoroughly and have found the enemy uses old roman contract law to prey on the american people.

Yup, after your trial you will be appearing in the Coliseum facing off against several gladiators, beasts and seeing a bunch of down-turned thumbs.

the case becomes a civil criminal case. its like saying that is hot cold ice cream.

Exactly. We have a funny term for that - it is called "oxymoron". Basically it means the phrase contradicts itself, so it isn't possible.

its not possible

I just said that - are you paying attention?

the whole thing is a fraud and criminal in nature, yet they make me out to be a criminal, wha a joke!

Yes, and ony because you gave support and weapons to a man who was breaking the law, now they want to lock you up as well. That is pretty nervy on their part.

i heard bob wolffe took a plea. that means he is going to testify against us. i am looking at 18 years. the sacrifice i have made for my country is tremendous. i just hope it is not in vain.

Sorry to break the news to you- but it was in vain.

chess, monopoly, checkers, cards, scrabble, are some of the games. we are locked in midnight till 5:30 am/ 6:45 till 8 am/ noon till 1pm/ 2:45 till 3:30 pm/ and 6pm till 7pm. the rest of the time you are allowed in the dayroom.

Yeah, this sounds worse than waterboarding. But as long as they are forcing you to play Monopoly, here's a hint: try to sew up the Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky Ave properties. That will give you an edge over the competition.

[Bud Dickman]

How do these guys get access to the internet to post this gibberish?

[Demosthenes]

They write letters to other Koolaid drinkers who then post them on the internet.

[LPC]

my new lawye is sven wiberg his emal is sven@criminaldefense.com drop him a message, something like

subject: daniel riley
message: this patriot deserves the best defense you can muster. he is a true american and needs our help.

something to that effect.

Riley got the email address wrong. Close, but wrong.

But I am thinking of dropping Sven an email. I'm going to change Riley's suggested message, though. For example, mine will include the words "condolences" and "nutjob."

[webhick]

my new lawye is sven wiberg his emal is sven@criminaldefense.com drop him a message, something like

subject: daniel riley
message: this patriot deserves the best defense you can muster. he is a true american and needs our help.

something to that effect.

Riley got the email address wrong. Close, but wrong.

But I am thinking of dropping Sven an email. I'm going to change Riley's suggested message, though. For example, mine will include the words "condolences" and "nutjob."

You may also want to warn him that my office has since replaced that missing piece of frontal lobe. With a jingle ball ferret toy. This information is vital to his defense because if Danny gets agitated on the stand, he'll start to make jingly noises and I think a jury will have a hard time paying attention to his testimony. The good news is that he's going to be the lead instrument/dancing moron at this year's prison Christmas concert.

[Disilloosianed]

Could someone explain the B.A.R. thing? I know it means that I am engaged in the process of overthrowing the government and all, but I am not sure how.

[Imalawman]

Could someone explain the B.A.R. thing? I know it means that I am engaged in the process of overthrowing the government and all, but I am not sure how.

Here ya go! I mean seriously, you can't argue with this kind of logic:

Hiding Behind the BAR
Why Attorneys are not lawyers
[ Author Unknown ]

In the U.S., they're collectively called everything from "attorney" to "lawyer" to "counselor." Are these terms truly equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken for another? What exactly is a "Licensed BAR Attorney?" This credential accompanies every legal paper produced by attorneys - along with a State Bar License number. As we are about to show you, an “attorney” is not a “lawyer,” yet the average American improperly interchanges these words as if they represent the same occupation, and the average American attorney unduly accepts the honor to be called "lawyer" when he is not.
In order to discern the difference, and where we stand within the current court system, it’s necessary to examine the British origins of our U.S. courts and the terminology that has been established from the beginning. It's important to understand the proper lawful definitions for the various titles we now give these court related occupations.
The legal profession in the U.S. is directly derived from the British system. Even the word "bar" is of British origin:
BAR. A particular portion of a court room. Named from the space enclosed by two bars or rails: one of which separated the judge's bench from the rest of the room; the other shut off both the bench and the area for lawyers engaged in trials from the space allotted to suitors, witnesses, and others. Such persons as appeared as speakers (advocates, or counsel) before the court, were said to be "called to the bar", that is, privileged so to appear, speak and otherwise serve in the presence of the judges as "barristers." The corresponding phrase in the United States is "admitted to the bar". - A Dictionary of Law (1893).
From the definition of “bar,” the title and occupation of a "barrister" is derived:
BARRISTER, English law. A counselor admitted to plead at the bar. 2. Ouster barrister, is one who pleads ouster or without the bar. 3. Inner barrister, a sergeant or king's counsel who pleads within the bar. 4. Vacation barrister, a counselor newly called to the bar, who is to attend for several long vacations the exercise of the house. 5. Barristers are called apprentices, apprentitii ad legem, being looked upon as learners, and not qualified until they obtain the degree of sergeant. Edmund Plowden, the author of the Commentaries, a volume of elaborate reports in the reigns of Edward VI., Mary, Philip and Mary, and Elizabeth, describes himself as an apprentice of the common law. - A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier (Revised Sixth Edition, 1856).
BARRISTER, n. [from bar.] A counselor, learned in the laws, qualified and admitted to please at the bar, and to take upon him the defense of clients; answering to the advocate or licentiate of other countries. Anciently, barristers were called, in England, apprentices of the law. Outer barristers are pleaders without the bar, to distinguish them from inner barristers, benchers or readers, who have been sometime admitted to please within the bar, as the king's counsel are. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
Overall, a barrister is one who has the privilege to plead at the courtroom bar separating the judicial from the non-judicial spectators. Currently, in U.S. courts, the inner bar between the bench (judge) and the outer bar no longer exists, and the outer bar separates the attorneys (not lawyers) from the spectator's gallery. This will be explained more as you read further. As with the word “bar,” each commonly used word describing the various court officers is derived directly from root words:

3 From the word "solicit" is derived the name and occupation of a “solicitor”; one who solicits or petitions an action in a court.

SOLICIT, v.t. [Latin solicito] 1. To ask with some degree of earnestness; to make petition to; to apply to for obtaining something. This word implies earnestness in seeking ... 2. To ask for with some degree of earnestness; to seek by petition; as, to solicit an office; to solicit a favor. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 4). From the word "attorn" is derived the name and occupation of an “attorney;” one who transfers or assigns property, rights, title and allegiance to the owner of the land.

ATTORN / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change, transform; deck out. 2. v.t Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign. 3. v.i. Transfer one”s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one”s tenancy (to), make legal acknowledgement of tenancy ( to a new landlord). - Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

ATTORN, v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ATTORNMENT, n. The act of a feudatory, vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ATTORNMENT n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another; formal acknowledgment of such transfer: lme. - Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

5). From the word advocate comes the meaning of the occupation by the same name; one who pleads or defends by argument in a court.

ADVOCATE, v.t. [Latin advocatus, from advoco, to call for, to plead for; of ad and voco, to call. See Vocal.] To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal; to support or vindicate.
- Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
5). From the word "counsel" is derived the name and occupation of a “counselor” or “lawyer”; one who is learned in the law to give advice in a court of law;
COUNSEL, v.t. [Latin. to consult; to ask, to assail.] 1. To give advice or deliberate opinion to another for the government of his conduct; to advise. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
LAWYER. A counselor; one learned in the law. - A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier (Revised Sixth Edition, 1856).
Although modern usage tends to group all these descriptive occupational words as the same, the fact is that they have different and distinctive meanings when used within the context of court activities:
Solicitor - one who petitions (initiates) for another in a court
Counselor - one who advises another concerning a court matter
Lawyer - [see counselor] learned in the law to advise in a court
Barrister - one who is privileged to plead at the bar
Advocate - one who pleads within the bar for a defendant
Attorney - one who transfers or assigns, within the bar, another's rights & property acting on behalf of the ruling crown (government)

It's very clear that an attorney is not a lawyer. The lawyer is a learned counselor who advises. The ruling government appoints an attorney as one who transfers a tenant's rights, allegiance, and title to the land owner (government).

Feudal Tenancy

If you think you are a landowner in America, take a close look at the warranty deed or fee title to your land. You will almost always find the words "tenant" or "tenancy." The title or deed document establishing your right as a tenant, not that of a landowner, has been prepared for transfer by a licensed BAR Attorney, just as it was carried out within the original English feudal system we presumed we had escaped from in 1776.
A human being is the tenant to a feudal superior. A feudal tenant is a legal person who pays rent or services of some sort for the use and occupation of another's land. The land has been conveyed to the tenant's use, but the actual ownership remains with the superior. If a common person does not own what he thought was his land (he's legally defined as a "feudal tenant," not the superior owner), then a superior person owns the land and the feudal tenant - person pays him to occupy the land.
This is the hidden Feudal Law in America. When a person (a.k.a. human being, corporation, natural person, partnership, association, organization, etc.) pays taxes to the tax assessor of the civil county or city government (also a person), it is a payment to the superior land owner for the right to be a tenant and to occupy the land belonging to the superior. If this were not so, then how could a local government sell the house and land of a person for not rendering his services (taxes)?
We used to think that there was no possible way feudal law could be exercised in America, but the facts have proven otherwise. It's no wonder they hid the definition of a human being behind the definition of a man. The next time you enter into an agreement or contract with another person (legal entity), look for the keywords person, individual, and natural person describing who you are.

Are you the entity the other person claims you are? When you "appear" before their jurisdiction and courts, you have agreed that you are a legal person unless you show them otherwise. You will have to deny that you are the person and state who you really are. Is the flesh and blood standing there in that courtroom a person by their legal definition?

British Accredited Registry (BAR)?

During the middle 1600's, the Crown of England established a formal registry in London where barristers were ordered by the Crown to be accredited. The establishment of this first International Bar Association allowed barrister-lawyers from all nations to be formally recognized and accredited by the only recognized accreditation society. From this, the acronym BAR was established denoting (informally) the British Accredited Registry, whose members became a powerful and integral force within the International Bar Association (IBA). Although this has been denied repeatedly as to its existence, the acronym BAR stood for the British barrister-lawyers who were members of the larger IBA.
When America was still a chartered group of British colonies under patent - established in what was formally named the British Crown territory of New England - the first British Accredited Registry (BAR) was established in Boston during 1761 to attempt to allow only accredited barrister-lawyers access to the British courts of New England. This was the first attempt to control who could represent defendants in the court at or within the bar in America.
Today, each corporate STATE in America has it's own BAR Association, i.e. The Florida Bar or the California Bar, that licenses government officer attorneys, NOT lawyers. In reality, the U.S. courts only allow their officer attorneys to freely enter within the bar while prohibiting those learned of the law - lawyers - to do so. They prevent advocates, lawyers, counselors, barristers and solicitors from entering through the outer bar. Only licensed BAR Attorneys are permitted to freely enter within the bar separating the people from the bench because all BAR Attorneys are officers of the court itself. Does that tell you anything?
Here's where the whole word game gets really tricky. In each State, every licensed BAR Attorney calls himself an Attorney at Law. Look at the definitions above and see for yourself that an Attorney at Law is nothing more than an attorney - one who transfers allegiance and property to the ruling land owner.
Another name game they use is "of counsel," which means absolutely nothing more than an offer of advice. Surely, the mechanic down the street can do that! Advice is one thing; lawful representation is another.
A BAR licensed Attorney is not an advocate, so how can he do anything other than what his real purpose is? He can't plead on your behalf because that would be a conflict of interest. He can't represent the crown (ruling government) as an official officer at the same time he is allegedly representing a defendant. His sworn duty as a BAR Attorney is to transfer your ownership, rights, titles, and allegiance to the land owner. When you hire a BAR Attorney to represent you in their courts, you have hired an officer of that court whose sole purpose and occupation is to transfer what you have to the creator and authority of that court. A more appropriate phrase would be legal plunder.

The official duties of an Esquire

Let's not forget that all U.S. BAR Attorneys have entitled themselves, as a direct result of their official BAR license and oaths, with the British title of "esquire." This word is a derivative of the British word "squire."
SQUIRE, n. [a popular contraction of esquire] 1. In Great Britain, the title of a gentleman next in rank to a knight. 2. In Great Britain, an attendant on a noble warrior. 3. An attendant at court. 4. In the United States, the title of magistrates and lawyers. In New-England, it is particularly given to justices of the peace and judges. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
ESQUIRE n. Earlier as squire n.1 lme. [Origin French. esquier (mod. écuyer) f. Latin scutarius shield - bearer, f. scutum shield: see - ary 1.] 1. Orig. (now Hist.), a young nobleman who, in training for knighthood, acted as shield-bearer and attendant to a knight. Later, a man belonging to the higher order of English gentry, ranking next below a knight. lme. b Hist. Any of various officers in the service of a king or nobleman. c A landed proprietor, a country squire. arch. - Oxford English Dictionary 1999.
During the English feudal laws of land ownership and tenancy, a squire - esquire - was established as the land proprietor charged with the duty of carrying out, among various other duties, the act of attornment [see definition above] for the land owner and nobleman he served. Could this be any simpler for the average American to understand? If our current U.S. BAR Attorneys were just lawyers, solicitors, barristers, advocates or counselors, then they would call themselves the same. They have named themselves just exactly what they are, yet we blindly cannot see the writing on the wall.
The BAR Attorneys have not hidden this from anyone. That's why they deliberately call themselves "Esquires" and "Attorneys at law." It is the American people who have hidden their own heads in the sand.
Knowing these simple truths, why would anyone consider the services of BAR Attorney-Esquire as his representative within the ruling courts of America? Their purposes, position, occupation, job, and duty is to transfer your allegiance, property, and rights to the landowner, a.k.a. STATE. They are sworn oath officers of the State whose sole authority is to transfer your property to their landowner-employer. Think about this the next time you enter their courtrooms. From now on, all Americans should refuse to enter past the outer bar when they are called. Who would voluntarily want to relinquish all he has by passing into their legal trap that exists inside that outer bar?
We must all refuse to recognize their royal position as Squires and refuse to hire them as our representatives and agents. They can't plead or argue for you anyway; all they can do is oversee the act of attornment on behalf of the ruling government whom they serve as official officers. Nothing stops your neighbor from being a barrister or lawyer. No real law prohibits any of us from being lawyers! Even Abraham Lincoln was a well-recognized lawyer, yet he had no formal law degree. Let the BAR Attorneys continue in their jobs as property transfer agent-officers for the State, but if no defendant hires them, they'll have to get new jobs or they'll starve. Fire your BAR Attorney and represent yourself as your own lawyer, or hire any non-BAR-licensed lawyer to assist you from outside the courtroom bar.
Refuse to acknowledge all judges who are also licensed BAR Attorneys. Every judge in Florida State is a member of the Florida BAR. This is unlawful and unconstitutional as a judge cannot be an Esquire nor can he represent any issue in commerce, such as that of the State. Every Florida State judge has compromised his purported neutral and impartial judicial position by being a State Officer through his BAR licensure. This is an unlawful monopoly of power and commerce.

The Unauthorized Practice of Law

Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment."
State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers.

[Quixote]

But as long as they are forcing you to play Monopoly, here's a hint: try to sew up the Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky Ave properties. That will give you an edge over the competition.

New York, Tennessee and St. James is a better set. But St. James probably has some connection with the B.A.R., not to mention Catholicism, which is just an Illuminati front. Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky is a much safer set, jurisdictionwise.

[webhick]

But as long as they are forcing you to play Monopoly, here's a hint: try to sew up the Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky Ave properties. That will give you an edge over the competition.

New York, Tennessee and St. James is a better set. But St. James probably has some connection with the B.A.R., not to mention Catholicism, which is just an Illuminati front. Indiana, Illinois and Kentucky is a much safer set, jurisdictionwise.

The Official Illuminati Monopoly strategy is as follows:

Purchase all lower end properties (the ones between GO and Jail) and develop. Purchase one property of each of the other sets as it becomes possible.

It's quite satisfying to have your nearly bankrupt opponent breathe a sign of relief as they roll past go and land on Baltic or Mediterranean Ave and as you painstakingly tally the rent watch the tiny beads of sweat form on their brow as they realize that the shittiest properties on the board just bankrupted them.

[Demosthenes]

New letter from the Dogwalker.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/471651/Letter ... ain-Singal

[Cpt Banjo]

The purple set has long had its devotees. In 1972 Atlantic City officials were considering changing the names of Mediterranean and Baltic Avenues, but ended up not doing so after they were met with howls of outrage from Monopoly fans, one of whom made the following eloquent plea to the city fathers:

"The streets of Atlantic City, through the medium of Monopoly, have been a microcosm of life, in which Baltic and Mediterranean have represented the last resort of the underdog to hold out against the oppressive forces of Boardwalk and Park Place power mongers."

[webhick]

After reading Danny's new letter:

Yeesh, this just like the supposed "raid" story. His story keeps changing.

First it's the Marshals (plural) who came to notify him of the court date on 10/26, now it's the Sherrif (singular).

In the first letter he says that he dares them to use force to get him out of the law library, then he tells the judge that he had a little tiff over the constitution and refused to go (merrily leaving out the part where he dared them).

In the first letter, he says that his shoulder was pulled out of socket while they were beating him up. In the second, he says that his shoulder was pulled out of socket when they handcuffed him (if he stopped frickin' wiggling, that probably wouldn't have happened. After all, he's in prison. Once he got away from them, where was he expecting to run to make an escape? Oklahoma?).

In the first letter, he says that he was "thrown" into the back of a van. In the second, it's clear that they restrained him.

He keeps bringing up how he was in the whole [sic] to the judge, but not to his little friend. Same with the nurse.

He also told the judge that he'd fight again. Makes me think that he got a little violent and they countered with the same (possibly coming on too strong and overestimating his capability to do actual damage, since Danny looks like a cream puff and probably hits like a girl).

[Imalawman]

New letter from the Dogwalker.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/471651/Letter ... ain-Singal

Wow, that's not going to go over well. Calling a judge "captain" is not a good legal strategy. Although it is fun reading for us. I wouldn't be surprised if a competency order is the result of that filing. edit - I see Cap'n beat me to that idea. Sorry for the redundancy.

[LPC]

As we are about to show you, an “attorney” is not a “lawyer,”

It would be more accurate to say that an attorney is not *necessarily* a lawyer.

An "attorney" is someone who represents someone else, so you can have both "attorneys-in-fact" (i.e., the agent under a power of attorney) and "attorneys-at-law."

And, needless to say, for every nut arguing that attorneys and lawyers are not the same, there is another nut arguing just as vehemently that the *are* the same. So some non-lawyer imbeciles have tried to represent other imbeciles in court, making the claim that, because they have a power of attorney from the other imbecile they have the right to represent them in court. Which doesn't work at all, of course.

[The Observer]

The Official Illuminati Monopoly strategy is as follows:

Purchase all lower end properties (the ones between GO and Jail) and develop. Purchase one property of each of the other sets as it becomes possible.

You mangled the strategy. What actually happens is that you buy Jail as a property (as per the hidden Illimunati rule that was implemented on our acquisition of Parker Bros.). From there you are allowed to designate secretly all of your other properties as another Jail space. When your opponent lands on them, not only can you collect the rent for the property, but can also imprison them and collect the monies they have to pay to get out of Jail.

[webhick]

The Official Illuminati Monopoly strategy is as follows:

Purchase all lower end properties (the ones between GO and Jail) and develop. Purchase one property of each of the other sets as it becomes possible.

You mangled the strategy. What actually happens is that you buy Jail as a property (as per the hidden Illimunati rule that was implemented on our acquisition of Parker Bros.). From there you are allowed to designate secretly all of your other properties as another Jail space. When your opponent lands on them, not only can you collect the rent for the property, but can also imprison them and collect the monies they have to pay to get out of Jail.

It just goes to show you how long it's been since I played Monopoly. Is the rule about pistol-whipping opponents until they agree to collaborate on a bank heists still in effect?

[Imalawman]

The Official Illuminati Monopoly strategy is as follows:

Purchase all lower end properties (the ones between GO and Jail) and develop. Purchase one property of each of the other sets as it becomes possible.

You mangled the strategy. What actually happens is that you buy Jail as a property (as per the hidden Illimunati rule that was implemented on our acquisition of Parker Bros.). From there you are allowed to designate secretly all of your other properties as another Jail space. When your opponent lands on them, not only can you collect the rent for the property, but can also imprison them and collect the monies they have to pay to get out of Jail.

Well, maybe you can understand why Webhick didn't mention that on a PUBLIC FORUM!!!! Geez, I have half a mind to report to "them" for that little indiscretion.