Actually, no. It's the Mango Carta 2017.Chaos wrote:is that the Margo Carta 2017?
![Image](https://rlv.zcache.com/ripe_mango_fruit_personalized_birthday_template_card-r1490dbbf2ad645bab15c1249019fb214_xvuat_8byvr_324.jpg)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Actually, no. It's the Mango Carta 2017.Chaos wrote:is that the Margo Carta 2017?
She's going to report the housing association to the police for insisting she pays rent? Seriously?Chaos wrote:is that the Margo Carta 2017?SteveUK wrote:Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but has Margo caved in and paid up ?
If I understand her broken English correctly, her complaint isn't that the housing association insisted that she pay her rent, which she claims she has been correctly paying. Her complaint is that she was taken to court, and the court ordered her to pay another £300 to the HA. (I'm not sure if this was for court costs or whatever.) And MC s61 requires her to disobey courts, and that's why she hasn't paid it.longdog wrote:She's going to report the housing association to the police for insisting she pays rent? Seriously?
... and many other actions, totallingmargo wrote:Enforsing or attempting to enforce a judgment from a “Court”
In August 2016, Margo wanted Tarvo Aas to stop harrassing her.margo wrote:17 985 800.00€ EUR
(TWELVE MILLION NINE HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED EUR’)
Trust me, in English law you can do that very thing "intentionally"....I cannot make myself homeless...
to which I refer the writer to Arkell v Pressdram.Any reply must be made on your full commercial liability and on penalty of perjury.
Except for the laws requiring her to pay bills for rent, council tax, gas etc. She has tried the OPPT garbage, and that hasn't worked, so now she is trying the MC s61 garbage, but is finding that this doesn't work either.De Leon Marqaux wrote:Im not ''east european'', Im born estonian,who respecting this law of the land,where Im living 9 years for now.
I wouldn't bet on any of the old Soviet block countries having any kind of common law at this point. As I recall the Soviet system was based strictly on civil law as they passed it, and that flowed down to the client states, and I doubt of most of them have bothered to change it since that is what they are most familiar with. So I'm pretty sure that BS doesn't fly in Estonia either.JimUk1 wrote:That's as batsh*t crazy as the time that French woman on PLD said she was going to invoke her common law rights in France!
I wouldn't even know off bat what kind of legal system Estonia had, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't involve English Barons! More likely some Slavic/Baltic legal system?
IIRC, the pre-1940 Estonian Constitution was revived when Estonia regained its independence; and it too was based on a civil law (not common law) concept.notorial dissent wrote:I wouldn't bet on any of the old Soviet block countries having any kind of common law at this point. As I recall the Soviet system was based strictly on civil law as they passed it, and that flowed down to the client states, and I doubt of most of them have bothered to change it since that is what they are most familiar with. So I'm pretty sure that BS doesn't fly in Estonia either.JimUk1 wrote:That's as batsh*t crazy as the time that French woman on PLD said she was going to invoke her common law rights in France!
I wouldn't even know off bat what kind of legal system Estonia had, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't involve English Barons! More likely some Slavic/Baltic legal system?
Yup, worked a treat for Tom. Another great win !!1!!Ok I got a question of interest for you all.
Promissory notes are legal tender and must be accepted by the bank.
They can refuse but if taken to court they would have to accept it as all cash notes are promissory notes.
So can we write a promissory note with wording on it that goes something like this.
I promise to pay the bearer the sum of £xxxxx
For whatever .
on demand after all suspected traitors have been investigated under article 61 of the 1215 magna Carta and found not guilty.
If found guilty any outstanding amounts owed by myself Peter of the family farrow and my legal fiction become null and void.
Any thoughts ont this please my friends
I don't think it's an eviction but a bailiff seizing goods to settle outstanding council tax debts... He (Peter Farrow) posted this yesterday...SteveUK wrote:It looks like poor old Peter is getting evicted tommorow:
But how does one get off the hook at the last minute???
Yup, worked a treat for Tom. Another great win !!1!!Ok I got a question of interest for you all.
Promissory notes are legal tender and must be accepted by the bank.
They can refuse but if taken to court they would have to accept it as all cash notes are promissory notes.
So can we write a promissory note with wording on it that goes something like this.
I promise to pay the bearer the sum of £xxxxx
For whatever .
on demand after all suspected traitors have been investigated under article 61 of the 1215 magna Carta and found not guilty.
If found guilty any outstanding amounts owed by myself Peter of the family farrow and my legal fiction become null and void.
Any thoughts ont this please my friends
Naturally there's all manner of idiotic advice from his fellow idiots encouraging him to do all manner of idiotic things that won't work including this gem from David 'hasn't got a fucking clue' Robinson with the usual inability to recognise the difference between a legal right of access and an implied right of access...Hello my fellow rebels.
My partner has just had an enforcement agent post his toilet paper informing her they will be returning tomorrow with a locksmith to remove goods I. I had just pulled up and spoke with him and informed him of our lawful stranding, and I informed him everything in the house is mine and they can't take it, he said do you have receipts to prove it is all yours,
luckily in December I borrowed £1,000 from my friend and gave him a receipt that said I sold him all my worldly goods and £1,000 went into my account of which I still haven't paid him back and so everything I own belongs to my friend .
The bailiff reckons he can still take stuff I said I better let you know that under article 61 of the Magna Carta I have the right to bear arms and I will defend my castle he said he will phone the police , I said that's good because they're here to protect me from outlaws like you so now I'm going to go to the police station and lobby the police again and inform them of my lawful standing and I will be informing them that I will be phoning them tomorrow to defend me against these unlawful acts by bailiffs against me and I will be expecting them to defend me from these Outlaws .
Mind you... David Robinson also had this to say earlier...Yes by serving them a removal of implied right of access they cannot then presume you cnsent to their tresspass.
"you could be the one whom makes the break through"... Or... "This shit has never worked for anybody else but you never know your luck".You never know Peter you could be the one whom makes the break through? it only takes one good cop to act according to the evidential truth, he/she would get the support of thousands of people if they did.
If you keep your manner peaceful and friendly but act assertively then you will certainly get the respect of some of the cops, even if they remain quiet about it....honest cops that is...I forget where you are Peter Farrow?...it would be good if some of the members could witness the event too.