
https://www.facebook.com/groups/lasuret ... 026909303/
Moderator: Burnaby49
But isn't that pretty much the default footl/ sovict/freeman position on just about everything, not things as they are but as they want to pretend they are????arayder wrote:Apparently Petey and his crowd think the law is what they imagine it to be and that solutions to self-induced legal problems can be dreamed up the same way the super hero's side kick thinks up a life saving plan at the end of a bad movie.
Call me old school if you wish, But I think letting your daughter use the f word in a public post is low dog.coffeekitten wrote:Of course, Pete isn't gone. Now, he brings his children into this, sharing a translated post from his daughter Majorie, claiming that CRA broke his children when, as a matter of fact, HE did this to his children.![]()
https://www.facebook.com/groups/lasuret ... 026909303/
The way most sane folks do it is to pay the tax and then fight the question out in court. If you win you get the money back, maybe your attorney fees and court costs. . .and you get the thanks of the people. Maybe you get some speaking engagements, slaps on the back and few free drinks.notorial dissent wrote:But isn't that pretty much the default footl/ sovict/freeman position on just about everything, not things as they are but as they want to pretend they are????arayder wrote:Apparently Petey and his crowd think the law is what they imagine it to be and that solutions to self-induced legal problems can be dreamed up the same way the super hero's side kick thinks up a life saving plan at the end of a bad movie.
If it's Pete's wife house, as he already said, may the government seize it? Anyway, they're not as innocent as they claim, I agree.notorial dissent wrote:One of two things is happening here, either mummy and daughter are really and truly clueless about how big of an ass dear old da is, or they are aware and enablers or at the very least turning a blind eye to his self destructive behavior. Based on the post, I am more than inclined to believe that they are fellow travelers and have no problem with his self destructive behavior, although it will probably end in a jail sentence for him, I think he is either well past or fast approaching the point where even a Canadian judge will jail him, and possibly homelessness for them. My sympathy for the "innocent parties" is fast evaporating.
It's not the original post. In Quebecer, it's "tabarnak" and "crisse". But it's not exactly a polite and appropriate speaking on Facebook.arayder wrote: Call me old school if you wish, But I think letting your daughter use the f word in a public post is low dog.
Maybe she's over 21 or something. Who knows.
Nice job there, Petey. . .not!
In 2003 and 2004, my Boy Scout troop went up to Quebec for a week of summer camp. Their Canadian counterparts made them very welcome; and one way in which they did this was to teach them a few basic French words. Of course, the two quoted by coffeekitten, plus "ostie" and others, were among the first words taught.coffeekitten wrote:It's not the original post. In Quebecer, it's "tabarnak" and "crisse". But it's not exactly a polite and appropriate speaking on Facebook.arayder wrote: Call me old school if you wish, But I think letting your daughter use the f word in a public post is low dog.
Maybe she's over 21 or something. Who knows.
Nice job there, Petey. . .not!
Yes. The CRA can, and does, seize people's homes if they have a big enough outstanding tax bill they won't, or can't, pay. I recently discussed this issue with another CRA retiree who's representing a Fiscal Arbitrator sucker in respect to collection issues. Guy owes a huge pile of money he has no way of paying but owns his house. So my friend has advised him to go into bankrupcy to see if he can keep something from the shambles.coffeekitten wrote:If it's Pete's wife house, as he already said, may the government seize it? Anyway, they're not as innocent as they claim, I agree.notorial dissent wrote:One of two things is happening here, either mummy and daughter are really and truly clueless about how big of an ass dear old da is, or they are aware and enablers or at the very least turning a blind eye to his self destructive behavior. Based on the post, I am more than inclined to believe that they are fellow travelers and have no problem with his self destructive behavior, although it will probably end in a jail sentence for him, I think he is either well past or fast approaching the point where even a Canadian judge will jail him, and possibly homelessness for them. My sympathy for the "innocent parties" is fast evaporating.
Over the years freemen have told lots stories about family and friends being estranged after having tired to talk them out their "awakenings".notorial dissent wrote:One of two things is happening here, either mummy and daughter are really and truly clueless about how big of an ass dear old da is, or they are aware and enablers or at the very least turning a blind eye to his self destructive behavior. Based on the post, I am more than inclined to believe that they are fellow travelers and have no problem with his self destructive behavior. . .
arayder wrote:notorial dissent wrote:
I have to wonder if we are seeing development of a permanent class of multi-generational nitwits.
Rogue Support is Scott Duncan, and as mentioned previously, the address is a UPS drop box. I haven't checked out the phone number yet.coffeekitten wrote: Be advised that the Rogue Support Agency Inc has been appointed AS AN AUTHORIZED AGENT for this matter. All verbal and/or telephone communication must be sent to 416-994-1700.
Rogue Support Inc
1001 7b Pleasant Blvd
Toronto, ON M471Y7
Break out the popcorn folks. Scott's about to move from the ranks of the so called visionaries with bold new ideas to that of failed gurus with a trail of ruined lives and embarressing courtroom loses left in their wakes.eric wrote:Rogue Support is Scott Duncan, and as mentioned previously, the address is a UPS drop box. I haven't checked out the phone number yet.coffeekitten wrote: Be advised that the Rogue Support Agency Inc has been appointed AS AN AUTHORIZED AGENT for this matter. All verbal and/or telephone communication must be sent to 416-994-1700.
Rogue Support Inc
1001 7b Pleasant Blvd
Toronto, ON M471Y7
" HAUT ET FORT" Yeah, it's bad translation, sorry. It would be better said "LOUD AND CLEARLY", I guess. It's like saying something very loud, without fear.notorial dissent wrote:
When he uses this phrase "The famous "freeman-on-the-land" are my ENEMIES, I'm AGAINST all what those idiots are telling. I claim HIGH AND STRONG that there are LAWS here, that WE must ALL OBEY to the LAW, that NOBODY is over the LAW." what does "HIGH AND STRONG" translate to in French? I can't get in to the faceplant page to actually see it.