https://m.facebook.com/groups/practical ... view=group
![Beating a Dead Horse :beatinghorse:](./images/smilies/horse.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Luke Robinson
Hey Tom..hope u r winning ur case bud.
doublelong wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itg-lfs ... youtu.be&a
THE WAKE UP PROJECT TOM CRAWFORD ANALYSING WARRANTS OF POSSESSION
Title says it all.
But we can read the actual words on the warrant:Tom wrote:The first thing you see on this warrant is that it's addressed to the defendant, and the defendant is entitled to a copy.
Tom has previously read this section, at 7m 30s, and he knows what these words mean. But now he skips over the obvious meaning, and claims, "The first thing you see on this warrant is that it's addressed to the defendant". No it isn't, Tom! It isn't!!!!!111!!To the district judge and bailiffs of the court
That Tom needs 36 minutes to talk about warrants is all that needs to be said. If there was any material fact why as to he should still own Fearn Chase, it would not take this long to explain.0:00/35:55
littleFred wrote:It would be slightly more persuasive if he showed the actual warrant in his own case, rather than a blank warrant.
One unicorn = £43,000 (capital repayment).TheNewSaint wrote: "Still looking for a unicorn", indeed.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... EW.DOC.docThe application of Section 38 Health and Safety in relation to question 3 has been appropriately applied in relation to this matter. Whilst we accept that Police Officers are filmed or recorded whilst in uniform and are in public facing roles. This particular situation has been assessed on Nottinghamshire Polices awareness before and after this Operation. Within the considerations favouring non-disclosure, it was clear that some supporters of Tom Crawford had targeted individual Officers on and off duty and extended this to members of their family. Nottinghamshire Police Officers were at this Operation as part of their duties to allow peaceful protest and prevent a breach of the peace. For these officers to then be targeted after this Operation, and this be extended to them whilst off duty and their family’s it is appropriate to protect the safety, physical and mental health of these individuals.
it was clear that some supporters of Tom Crawford had targeted individual Officers on and off duty and extended this to members of their family. Nottinghamshire Police Officers were at this Operation as part of their duties to allow peaceful protest and prevent a breach of the peace. For these officers to then be targeted after this Operation, and this be extended to them whilst off duty and their family’s it is appropriate to protect the safety, physical and mental health of these individuals.
Not now, but in September 2015.exiledscouser wrote:Now we learn that Crawfraud supporters are "stalking" the very same police and their families themselves.
Penny Wise wrote:For the benefit of Amanda
it was clear that some supporters of Tom Crawford had targeted individual Officers on and off duty and extended this to members of their family.
I think the post missed theJeffrey wrote:Is that the Channel 4 documentary that Quatloos people got contacted for information for?