![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
https://m.facebook.com/groups/388605611 ... 5458660488
Ladies and Gentlemen, Ollie has left the group!
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Not surprised, he was made to look a complete prat in both the local and national news, all thanks to Crab Bait emailing all the local rags with the news that he'd tried the most idiotic way of getting out of paying his Council Tax.JimUk1 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
https://m.facebook.com/groups/388605611 ... 5458660488
Ladies and Gentlemen, Ollie has left the group!
I suspect that's probably nearest to the truth. Her contempt for the 'rebels' was made more than clear and I have no doubt she gave Ollie a very hard time for being such a monumental prat when he had a young family to consider.AndyPandy wrote:Either that or his mum's taken away his computer for being a very naughty boy![]()
![]()
Nah, nah, nah. TPTB made him an offer that was too good to refuse.longdog wrote:I suspect that's probably nearest to the truth. Her contempt for the 'rebels' was made more than clear and I have no doubt she gave Ollie a very hard time for being such a monumental prat when he had a young family to consider.AndyPandy wrote:Either that or his mum's taken away his computer for being a very naughty boy![]()
![]()
JimUk1 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
https://m.facebook.com/groups/388605611 ... 5458660488
Ladies and Gentlemen, Ollie has left the group!
SovCits commonly believe that an oath can be turned on and off like a tap, hence the importance of asking police, judges etc whether they are "on their oath".rumpelstilzchen wrote:Leaving the group does not alter the fact that he is still under his oath. If he decides to go against his oath and ceases to be in lawful rebellion surely he is committing a crime?
Best post, evah!longdog wrote:It's not widely known but if the USSR had stationed West Country cleaners in Eastern Poland during 1941 Operation Barbarossa would've ground to a halt.
"Youm might be the Waffen SS moi luvver but yourn still gonna have to go 'ome. Oim gonna lock arp now".
What a pathetic little Ahole.Hercule Parrot wrote:Christ on a bike - is there no depth of petty, tight-fisted nonsense which these idiots won't sink to?
Darren King has heard that a major supermarket chain is doing a charity initiative, and he declares this is a criminal scandal which must be stopped. With astonishing hypocrisy he claims that statute laws prohibit this, and are enforceable:
To be clear for our overseas friends, nearly every shop in UK has charity projects, collecting boxes for loose change at the checkouts etc. It isn't illegal or prohibited, and there will be no "shit going off" on Monday.
But, but, but they're all under lawful rebellion, so how can they sue if they're aren't any legitimate Courts !?!Colin123 wrote:I sort of respect the idiots that are standing under their article 61, But what i do find hypocritical is not paying their council tax, But yet still expecting services that the local councils provide
To me, This goes a step further, This idiot refuses to pay his council tax, Fair enough, But FFS if that is your thing, Don't expect to try and claim for damage to your car caused by a pot hole
Maybe if he and his friends had paid, The council would have had more money to repair the road
If he does submit a claim, I really hope they check what council tax he owes before they even consider it
Looks like I might be able to get some money from HMRC say Lou.JimUk1 wrote:Heres a great idea! Ignore your accountant and go ask Duress Dave instead!
Ffs stupid Person! HMRC don't mess about Lou!
https://m.facebook.com/groups/388605611 ... 6088595425
Lu Lou
No not yet, she's saying my start up costs could have a wee bit owed to me so she needs me to fill in the form in order to claw back tax?
David Robinson
Hmmm..well ok then get what you can. You'll still be doing it under duress because you're under Oath to the barons. ...when it turns around and they want cash from you then its a different story.
On top of thatSteveUK wrote:Ironic Facebook update of the week comes from our favourite rebeless Margo:Tamm
Well they would wouldn't they !!Jiva Jones
10 mins
Just got a visit from 3 Police Officers of Hackney Constabulary. Very friendly and polite. After I sent the Chief a notice, he sent these guys to see if I was "alright". They were a bit confused as to what it was all about. They seemed to think it was to do with Brexit. I explained Article 61 and the treason being committed. And Council Tax withholding etc. I would only consent to trial by jury and I would consider it kidnapping if I was forced to appear before magistrates. I'd been having a nap, so I had to try and explain everything the best I could. They were very receptive and curious.
Without looking, I'm going to guess that Mr King doesn't understand the difference between collecting money for a charity, and being a charity.Hercule Parrot wrote:Darren King has heard that a major supermarket chain is doing a charity initiative, and he declares this is a criminal scandal which must be stopped. With astonishing hypocrisy he claims that statute laws prohibit this, and are enforceable: