Sovrun Paraleguls

[King Lud]

How odd - I still see all the original content on his site. Doesn't look like anything has been removed ?

I can see the documents too.

[longdog]

The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.

[AndyPandy]

The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.

Apologies, two separate pages, one headed possession orders with the Court docs, the other mortgage fraud without !

[SteveUK]

The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.

Apologies, two separate pages, one headed possession orders with the Court docs, the other mortgage fraud without !

Either way, it all adds up to one amazing loss for our heroes!

[longdog]

The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.

Apologies, two separate pages, one headed possession orders with the Court docs, the other mortgage fraud without !

Either way, it all adds up to one amazing loss for our heroes!

What amuses me most is that the 'expert' has left the 'mortgage fraud' page up even though it's a public admission that the 'possession order' case was at best vexatious and at worst criminally actionable. Given the documents and 'legal advice' on the 'fraud' page there's no way Ms Gardiner or the 'expert' could possibly have a good faith belief that they were entitled to possession of No 17.

[AndyPandy]

What amuses me most is that the 'expert' has left the 'mortgage fraud' page up even though it's a public admission that the 'possession order' case was at best vexatious and at worst criminally actionable. Given the documents and 'legal advice' on the 'fraud' page there's no way Ms Gardiner or the 'expert' could possibly have a good faith belief that they were entitled to possession of No 17.

He thought he was being clever and she doesn't look or sound like the sharpest tool in the box, so would be easily convinced.

I suspect the Judge threw them out of Court with a hefty costs order, hence the silence. He had his arse kicked and has slunk away to lick his wounds and wait for his next vulnerable victim to fall into his clutches.

[Hercule Parrot]

I suspect the Judge threw them out of Court with a hefty costs order, hence the silence. He had his arse kicked and has slunk away to lick his wounds and wait for his next vulnerable victim to fall into his clutches.

Yep, another victory for the ExpertInFuckAll. What's remarkable is the conspiracy of silence - all the usual FB pages are completely silent. All the people who cheered him on, none of them are asking what happened.

On the bright side, it was a fun trip for EIFA - didn't cost him anything more than the train ticket, and Hackney Helen can pick up the pieces...

[Hercule Parrot]

"Since 2012, Helen has been fighting to get her original contract from the company she took out her mortgage with. Since then, another mortgage company has taken over her account i.e. brought the account from the previous company, so, she has been trying for the last four years to get her original agreement. This is a clear breach of contract law, as one contract cannot roll over when a new lender has taken over. A new contract must be issued by the new provider and must set out new terms and conditions under contract law, and most importantly, must be signed by the debtor and creditor and witnessed."

I don't know how things work in the UK; but every mortgage I've ever seen, in the past 30 years, on this side of the pond, contains a provision permitting the assignment of the mortgage elsewhere...

Same here. The EIFA is talking nonsense. A contract which contains provision for assignation or sale does not have to be replaced when assignation or sale occurs. And E&W residential mortgages always contain provision for assignation or sale. So there is no need for a new contract, as the current contract remains valid.

He is either very stupid, or he knows that his target audience are very stupid.

[SteveUK]

Ultimately, a minor typo will not be allowed to frustrate the deal.

Did you take the banks money? Yes. Do you live in the house you have registered at the LR? yes.

Are you stark raving lunatic chancing it? Yes.

As o'bernica found out the hard way,these admin errors are no "remedy".

[SteveUK]

Another Hollywood blockbuster in the makfailing.

[MaritalArtist]

Well Ya I No TV Productions do have some quality content on their site-

The famous "Meet Your Strawman"
http://www.yainoproductions.com/your-strawman/

And an appearance by our old friend Ceylon
http://www.yainoproductions.com/yorkshire-water/

Though why YouTube videos are on a TV production company site is beyond me.

[John Uskglass]

Strangely, YA I NO was dissolved on 17 June this year.

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/search?q=08886594

IANAL, but isn't trading once dissolved a bit iffy?

[Siegfried Shrink]

Does claiming your page is copywrite invalidate your copyright?

[JimUk1]

Does claiming your page is copywrite invalidate your copyright?

Copyright is unlawful you see!

But 'copywriting'- is not because you're just waking up the sheeple

[Siegfried Shrink]

Thank you for that explanation which will help keep my feet on the True Path.

Surely Satan must have prompted me to mock!!!!

Off for some more scourging.

[SteveUK]

Strangely, YA I NO was dissolved on 17 June this year.

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/search?q=08886594

IANAL, but isn't trading once dissolved a bit iffy?

They shouldn't be allowed to trade on the basis of still using CorelDraw v1 to produce their graphics!

[Arthur Rubin]

Does claiming your page is copywrite invalidate your copyright?

(A serious note....perhaps). It doesn't explicitly disclaim or release copyright, so no. However, they do not recognize the validity of the courts where they would have to file an infringement claim....

[notorial dissent]

Really hard to enforce a legal claim if you don't acknowledge the authority oif the only entity that can legall enforce it. Quite a except for the hypocrisy factor, then again, that is this bunch's stock in trade.

[Philistine]

Strangely, YA I NO was dissolved on 17 June this year.



IANAL, but isn't trading once dissolved a bit iffy?

They shouldn't be allowed to trade on the basis of still using CorelDraw v1 to produce their graphics!

This.
I was going to say that their flyer looked like a clown threw up on paper.

[exiledscouser]

Surely Satan must have prompted me to mock!!!!

Off for some more scourging.

Reminds me of the apocryphal story of the man on his deathbed asked by the priest to renounce Satan.

"Now is not the time" he reportedly said "to start making enemies".