There's a lot of stupid in David Robinson's latest scrawl, but it contains a truly shocking admission:
David Robinson wrote:It is ONLY an effective remedy when at least 5% of the population are demanding the rule of law is reasserted
WHAT???!!!! Mr Robinson, are you seriously telling me this Article 61 shit only works when 5% or more of the population are demanding it?
Did you make Ollie Pinnock aware of this fact before he got himself arrested for following your instructions?
Did you make Robert White or Charles Spencer (however he spells his name), who are well on their way to bankruptcy and homelessness, aware that their tactics are ineffective until 5% of the population (about 3 million over the entire UK) are also doing it?
If any of you David Robinson followers are reading this thread, here's what I'm getting at:
HE'S ADMITTING IT DOESN'T WORK, YOU GUYS.
David Robinson has just given himself a permanent excuse for when YOUR attempts to use Article 61 fail, and when YOU suffer the consequences. He'll say "it's because not enough people are doing it." As if he didn't already have enough excuses; we've already seen him use the ol' "you didn't do it right" excuse in this very post:
“so why hasn't Article 61 worked?” The answer to both questions in order are 1. Stand under the constitution to protect myself and the constitution itself and 2, because YOU ARE NOT USING IT.
Which, in all those words, he doesn't tell you how to do.
About those success stories:
I stopped a friend from going to prison for seven days for contempt of court. I had HMRC repay fines paid for refusing to fill in tax forms. I stopped the police and court attempting to prosecute a friend for growing 30+ hemp plants, which the corrupt police decided were cannabis plants and attempted to prosecute her. The CPS (imposters) claimed lack of evidence and closed the case.....where did 30+ well established hemp plants go? Article 61 was the only angle I used.
Do any of these people have names? Because the only hard documentation your group puts out are letters from government agencies saying they aren't cowed by all your mighty Article 61-ness.
I will, however, agree with Mr Robinson on one point:
Those who do not research for themselves whilst the evidence is readily available, are either stupid or evil or both.
Okay, then:
Then, compare what you have read to the wide range of claims made by Mr Robinson in the above.
Remember: those who do not research for themselves whilst the evidence is readily available, are either stupid or evil or both.