Good afternoon rebels....
It seems that Lord Graigmyle (one of the committee of the barons) is getting a lot of Oaths in his mail which causes him some problems, he explained in a letter to a friend that his mailbox has become unsatisfactory with all the Oaths.
I wonder where he found the letter to a friend? Indeed, I wonder if Lord Craigmyle is really getting all that many oaths. A first class stamp and recorded deliver takes a good chunk of what is left after deducting beer money from state benefits.
I can imagine it being annoying mind you.....we don't need to send Oath to the barons we can just create one and have three wittnesses sign it.....we oroginally asked folk to send theirs to a baron to alert them that people are waking up.
The barons committee is hardly a source of power for the movement to be blunt. Some are too ill or too old to direct anything....some have passed away and others are turn coats.....we don't need to rely on the barons direction anyway as they already directed the people to peacefully rebel by invoking article 61.
Having said that, at least Lord Craigmyle has asked for more information and maybe willing to have a meeting with the more prominent members of the movement.
We need to remember that everyone has been dumbed down and even some of the most enlightened constitutional protectors of the last few dacades didn't appear to understand what article 61 states. They often seem to ignore the evidenced truth that all courts today are unauthorized since article 61 was invoked .....they seem to have a mental blockage in understanding that there are no courts of law therfore attempting to bring private prosecutions etc within the current system is absolute double think and illegal....
Hard to imagine why they cannot understand. Or, indeed, stand under this clear and obvious evidence that you have presented. Possibly you should restate the evidence?
The people do not need to be directed by the barons committee other than what they have already done (invoked article 61). It would help if they were trying to help defend those of us using the constitution perhaps but I don't see how tbh?
Would it be treason to charge some of them with treason?
Don't worry about some of them dying, the hereditary principle replaces them with a fresh younger baron.
The only remedy we have is for the people to unite in peace and to demand the constitutional law is observed by the police especially, and the judiciary of course.....its up to us regardless of what the barons do or don't do...
Barons, who needs 'em? They are now surplus to requirements, liquidate them!
.we just need to get on with it instead of arguing ....it was invoked according to the correct protocols of British constitutional law that cannot truthfully be denied. Not to stand under it is to ignore or deny the constitution, denouncing all of our rights and freedoms that it clearly protects by acquiensence......All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
You have to admit it is inspiring stuff. If Henry before Agincourt could have rallied the troops thus we might not all be speaking French now.
I cannot see this being good for more than a few months .
