ceylon2 wrote:
Similar to an empty office you mean haha
It's not critism it's pur rudeness and attacked the moment i posted, so not even a thought before hand.
I would hardly call it being attacked but even if you were being attacked you dealt with it very badly. As I said above... You need to learn to handle criticism. Even if you feel criticism is entirely unwarranted you do yourself no favours by throwing your toys out of the pram.
And the book comments before even reading the whole thing. Judge a book by it's cover, not you
One of the joys of Amazon is that you usually get a chance to read the beginning of a book and that's what I did for your magnificent octopus. I've not judged the book by the cover (which is bloody awful by the way) and I'm not impressed.
I've asked repeatedly that you be honest about the book and whether or not chapter 6, which runs to almost 300 pages and 90% of the whole book, is a verbatim reproduction of the judgement in Meads vs Meads. Would you like to confirm or deny this now or do you intend avoid the question forever?
By the way... Your 'Table of contents' goes..
5
8
11
17
20
27
36
320
314
How can you have possibly missed that?