The rat king trying his failed methods again .
Posted today (evidence file not included in this post)
To: Mr Ken Fraser (Doing business as Manager for Northampton Magistrates Court).
Campbell Square
Northampton.
Northamptonshire.
NN1 3EB
From: David Robinson
Daventry
NN11
Date: 16-10-2017
Served by recorded post.
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT – NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.
YOUR REF: 901699988
This is a legal Notice. Please read it carefully. It informs you. It means what it says. I do not use the law society’s ‘Legalese’ terminology therefore there are no hidden meanings or interpretations beyond the simple English statements herein made. If you fail to respond to this 'Notice of Conditional Acceptance' in 'substance' then you shall be deemed to be in absolute agreement with all of the evidenced claims herein made. Please do not ignore it.
A reply to this notice is REQUIRED and is to be made whilst stating the respondents clearly legible FULL PRINTED NAME. Any unidentified reply received shall be deemed as fraudulent coercion to extort monies with menaces. All replies are to be made on the respondents full commercial liability and on penalty of perjury. A response to this 'Notice of Conditional Acceptance' is required in full within SEVEN (7) days from your receipt of it. Failure to reply as said, will represent your full tacit agreement to FACTS presented and evidenced herein.
This matter requires a response from you personally Ken Fraser. Any agent of the non limited business 'NORTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES COURT' (company number 3844295) responding to this 'Notice of Conditional Acceptance' may also be held liable for any crimes or torts that may be committed as a result.
You are clearly the manager of a run for profit business using legislation that does not comply with the common law. Britain is a common law jurisdiction and I shall ONLY consent to appear at a hearing that is authorized, and that abides by the rule of law in a de-jure court not a de-facto administrative hearing.
Having received a letter from an alleged “Clerk to the Justices” dated 13 October 2017, which appears to be a fraudulent and unauthorized “summons” with regard to non payment of Council Tax, written on non headed paper without so much as a wet signature nor printed name attached. I claim the document received is no more than an invite to attend an illegal place of business therefore I am replying under duress of circumstances in order to prevent crime.
It is my intention to remain in honour at all times in dealing with this matter therefore, I hereby CONDITIONALLY ACCEPT liability of the £1070.64 demand made against I, David Robinson for Council tax, on proof being provided in substance, that the Crown (British monarch) has the legal authority to authorize DAVENTRY DISTRICT COUNCIL and /or NORTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES COURT to make such a demand at this time and since the invocation of Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 came into effect.
I shall duly comply with the demands being made against me on proof that the following numbered assertions are evidential in FACT.
1. That, NORTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES' COURT (Non Limited Business) has the legal authority to demand that I, David Robinson attend such a place of business under the authority of a constitutional monarch (Crown) and, that when I do not “appear” that NORTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES COURT also has the legal authority to proceed against I, David Robinson as if I had appeared.
2. That, Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta has since been revoked and publicly announced to have revoked by the barons' committee whom invoked it on the 23rd March 2001.
3. That, you Ken Fraser, including all business associates within said Non Limited Business known as NORTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES COURT, are also standing under Article 61's invocation.
It is therefore my legal duty to inform you that I, David Robinson stands fully under the committee of the Barons invocation of Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, invoked in strict accordance with the correct protocols of British Constitutional law on the 23rd day of March 2001 (see exhibit A – Daily Telegraph report and exhibit B - transcripts of letters between the crown and barons' committee), and that I DO NOT AND CANNOT CONSENT BY LAW to the demands being made against me, and/or the legal fiction that I DO NOT represent.
Please be aware that to deny the evidential fact that Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 has been invoked, and that it remains is in effect to this very day, would be to deny the supremacy of British Constitutional law over treasonous legislation set down by quislings within Westminster and, if so stated, or written publicly to that effect, would provide evidence of the crime of sedition at common law.
To stand under the barons invocation of said Article 61 is the constitutional DUTY of ALL British and Commonwealth subjects at this time. NOT to do so once fully aware of the facts, would be an act of wilful ignorance to a most important royal command and constitutional tenet. Ignorance is no defence in law. I have a duty to “compel” you Ken Fraser to stand in defence of the realm as demanded within Article 61 (see exhibit C – Article 61 text).
The contractual agreement within the treaty of Magna Carta, that the crown would command the common people to peacefully rebel against itself (the crown) if it were at anytime in breach of the constitutional laws of the realm, was an agreement to ensure that the common people always had redress against a tyrant. That provision was sealed at Runnymead on the 15th June 1215 and still stands as law to this very day as evidenced herein, despite what any senior management or alleged authority figure may claim. Obviously Elizabeth II would not have replied to the barons' petition if Magna Carta 1215 was not in effect. The law of course demands that we do not aid and abet crime and that we are each individually liable for the informed choices that we each make.
I have legally denounced any presumption of allegiance to the crown. In 2010 I transferred my allegiance from the crown to the barons committee in accordance with my individual duty under British law.
The barons whom were led by Lord Ashbourne when petitioning the office of sovereign at noon on the 7th day of February 2001 and, whom later invoked Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta on the 23rd day of March of the same year after redress for treason was not received, are now the highest body of authority within the realm according to British constitutional law. I, David Robinson therefore claim that I cannot by law pay monies into the coffers of DAVENTRY DISTRICT COUNCIL nor can I consent to said “summons”. The law FORBIDS me to do so.
Furthermore, it is not my fault that Elizabeth II did not provide redress to the barons' petition and as a result they, (the barons), subsequently invoked said Article. I do not intend to break the law and if forced to do so by coercion and force, then you Ken Fraser shall be held personally liable. “Any Act done by me against my will is not my act” (maxim in law).
Whereas you may be unaware of the evidential thus provable fact that Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 was invoked on said date, and which stands to this day as the political position of the British Isles and Commonwealth, please be aware that you are required to do due diligence on this extremely serious matter before replying to my herein claims and assertions.
TAKE NOTICE THAT: Caroline Davies reported the fact that Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 was invoked within a report made within the Daily Telegraph on 24th March 2001, therefore it is on public record (I have attached a copy of the transcript as evidence along with a copy of a letter of authenticity – “Peers Petition Queen on Europe” - See Exhibit A).
Please be aware this document may be used in evidence.
ANY illegal claims made against I, David Robinson by persons within 'DAVENTRY DISTRICT COUNCIL' or 'NORTHAMPTON MAGISTRATES COURT' or any third party thereof, shall be counter-claimed within a properly convened court-de-jure of Twelve (12) impartial subjects deliberating on the facts under the constitutional law of the land, specifically in accordance with my common law rights under Magna Carta 1215 (Article 29) - (“The body of a free man is not to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way ruined, nor is the king to go against him or send forcibly against him, except by judgment of his peers or by the law of the land”). To deny anyone due process of law would be an act of treason at common law. All legal hearings are heard in open forum for “justice must be seen to be done”.
I, David Robinson do have lawful excuse to reject, “distress and distrain” the crown and its minions peacefully and, I take “leave” to do so entirely lawfully under the protection of British constitutional law. I strongly urge you to investigate the facts referred to herein.
If I receive no reply in SUBSTANCE to this Notice (which means addressing PRECISELY the numbered points made herein, in full) within the reasonable time provided, it shall be taken to mean by all interested parties (including ANY third party interlopers) that you/they are in ABSOLUTE agreement with the claims made and evidenced herein and, that no further claims can be legally made against I, David Robinson now or at any future time, unless and until redress of the barons petition in 2001 has been properly received and announced publicly by said barons.
I hereby attest and affirm that I am of sound mind and capable of conducting my own legal affairs and, that all that I have written herein is the truth, evidential, and is as to my understanding the truth in law.
Without malice, vexation, frivolity or ill will. Stated on my full commercial liability and on penalty of perjury, with no admission of liability whatsoever and with all my natural, unalienable common law rights reserved.
Sworn and subscribed on the date of: 16-10-2017
Signed: ______________________________________
Witnessed by:
1: ____________________________________
2: ______________________________________
3: ______________________________________