I Love this
t is therefore my legal duty to inform you that I, David Robinson stands fully under the committee of the Barons invocation of Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, invoked in strict accordance with the correct protocols of British Constitutional law on the 23rd day of March 2001 (see exhibit A – Daily Telegraph report and exhibit B - transcripts of letters between the crown and barons' committee), and that I DO NOT AND CANNOT CONSENT BY LAW to the demands being made against me, and/or the legal fiction that I DO NOT represent.
Because Strict Accordance is required, and is clearly spelled out in MC 1215, that a large group of 4 stogy old former Peers trying to make an Anti-Europe political statement, and with nothing better to do that day, deliver a bit of vellum parchment at Buckingham Palace, signed by 28 hereditaries, to the Queen's private secretary,and without any further action, this act satisfied all of A61 requirements, along of course with the requirement to recorded on the record in the Daily Telegraph, and nowhere else, makes this legit.
Will mention I did look up the translation of A61:
http://www.magnacartaplus.org/magnacarta/
I bolded some items I think may be missing to be viewed as strictly in accordance with:
Since for God, for the improvement of our kingdom, and to better allay the discord arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, and wishing that the concessions be enjoyed in their entirety with firm endurance (for ever [5]), we give and grant to the barons the following security:
Namely, that the barons choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom they wish, who must with all their might observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter. Then, if we, our chief justiciar, our bailiffs or any of our officials, offend in any respect against any man, or break any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is notified to four of the said twenty-five barons, the four shall come to us—or to our chief justicicar if we are absent from the kingdom—to declare the transgression and petition that we make amends without delay.
And if we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, have not corrected the transgression within forty days, reckoned from the day on which the offence was declared to us (or to the chief justice if we are out of the realm), the four barons mentioned before shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons. Together with the community of the whole land, they shall then distrain and distress us in every way possible, namely by seizing castles, lands, possessions and in any other they can (saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children), until redress has been obtain in their opinion. And when amends have been made, they shall obey us as before.
Whoever in the country wants to, may take an oath to obey the orders of the twenty-five barons for the execution of all the previously mentioned matters and, with the barons, to distress us to the utmost of his power. We publicly and freely give permission to every one who wishes to take this oath, and we shall never forbid any one from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling to this oath, we shall by our command compel them to swear to it.
If any one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is in any other manner incapacitated so the previously mentioned provisions cannot be undertaken, the remaining barons of the twenty-five shall choose another in his place as they think fit, who shall be duly sworn in like the rest.
If there is any disagreement amongst the twenty-five barons on any matter presented to them, or if some of them are unwilling or unable to be present, what the majority of those present ordain or command shall be held as fixed and established, exactly as if all twenty-five had consented in this.
The said twenty-five barons shall swear to faithfully observe all the aforesaid articles and will do all they can to ensure that the articles are observed by others.
And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else.
So when did all the Barons choose the 25 that signed,as strictly required by A61? Did they notify the Queen of the transgressions directly, if not, surly the chief justicicar. I think there are likely enough steps missing to make this 2001 act,invalid for failing to meet the strict requirements laid out in the article.
