"practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
BoomerSooner17
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:07 pm
Location: The Lone Star State

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by BoomerSooner17 »

daveBeeston wrote: Plus just think of the entertainment when one of the Sovcit/Fotler's tells a 3rd world dictator they won't pay for something.
In some countries, doesn't the punishment for theft involve the loss of an appendage?
"Never in the field of human conflict, was so much owed (but not paid), by so few, to so many." - Sir Winston Churchill
Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1756
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
Location: Brea, CA

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Arthur Rubin »

BoomerSooner17 wrote:In some countries, doesn't the punishment for theft involve the loss of an appendage?
One wonders what the penalty for rape might be....
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7559
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by The Observer »

Arthur Rubin wrote:
BoomerSooner17 wrote:In some countries, doesn't the punishment for theft involve the loss of an appendage?
One wonders what the penalty for rape might be....
Or the penalty for having a stupid thought like telling the dictator they won't pay up.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Comrade Sharik
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu May 11, 2017 2:17 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Comrade Sharik »

Meanwhile, Mr Robinson does his People's Front of Judea tribute act:
Please be aware that there are controlled opposition groups out there which claim to be standing in lawful rebellion....the worst of these being the White pendragons.
There are other groups that may not be controlled opposition but they are also operating in double think and ignoreing the fact that Britain and the entire commonwealth is in a state of 'diffidation' (legal rebellion). The freeman on the land groups and their associated movements who use their illegal acts and statutes along with their illegal courts, only provide their legislation and corporate businesses (courts) with legitimacy by doing so (double think).
Everyone's out of step but our David....
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

More absolutely crap fucking shite stationary available to purchase.

Image
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
exiledscouser
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1322
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by exiledscouser »

When I was a child I took great pleasure in sticking 1000's of these into books for my nan. They look very similar except they were once worth something;

Image
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

Big fail by rebel Hazel.
Interesting bits highlighted. I can't imagine for a minute why a concerned citizen would worry about their parenting skills.
Hi all,
I'm looking at registering my family's births on commonlawcourt.com and claiming our names back. How does this affect things though?
My sons intend on changing their surnames by deed poll when they are 16. Will it still be possible for them to do this.
Will my husband and I have any problem receiving benefits?
Will it remove us from the governments system completely?
Will we have problems applying for passports as none of us have ever had one.
What authority will social services think they have over our children if we can produce these common law documents? (we get reported anonymously on an annual basis).
Thanks in advance,
Hazel
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4806
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by longdog »

I'm completely at a loss as to how she thinks registering her family's births with the 'common law court' will have any effect on anything at all. Even by the standards of these nut-jobs it's utterly bizarre.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by notorial dissent »

I think the inoperative concept here is "thinks" it doesn't sound like she or hubby are at all familiar with the concept. Also sounds a bit to me like the sons what to distance themselves as far from the parents as possible. Wonder why??? :sarcasmon:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3759
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Hi all,
I'm looking at registering my family's births on commonlawcourt.com and claiming our names back. How does this affect things though? It doesn't but not doing the things required by law will.
My sons intend on changing their surnames by deed poll when they are 16. Will it still be possible for them to do this. Don't see why not if they follow procedure. One does have to ask why?
Will my husband and I have any problem receiving benefits?Yes
Will it remove us from the governments system completely?No
Will we have problems applying for passports as none of us have ever had one.Yes
What authority will social services think they have over our children if we can produce these common law documents? (we get reported anonymously on an annual basis).The same "authority" they have over any other children.
Thanks in advance,
Hazel
No problem.
One other thing. Please tell me how
Will my husband and I have any problem receiving benefits?
Will it remove us from the governments system completely?
are compatible?
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

the common law courts huge collection of registered birth certs is a site to behold

Image
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3759
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

SteveUK wrote:the common law courts huge collection of registered birth certs is a site to behold
It's all hearsay though, ask any SovCit.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4806
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by longdog »

SteveUK wrote:the common law courts huge collection of registered birth certs is a site to behold

Image
Try entering just 'Smith' in the search. There are plenty of entries for John Smith and his family but then he is the judge, jury, clerk, tip-staff, office cleaner and sole proprietor of the court :snicker:
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

Keep in mind all acts/statutes are ‘unlawful ‘ according to our mental friends.

Except when it suits your argument of course!

Image
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
John Uskglass
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 1:21 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by John Uskglass »

Another bizarre case for the PLD crew.
I am a victim of Dyfed Powys police, they amputated 3 of my fingers in custody.
The ipcc conducted an INDEPENDENT investigation into my injury and cleared all officers involved.
I was invited to an interview with the crime commissioner for Wales 2 months ago and I secretly recorded it for evidence.
When the meeting ended I told an ipcc officer to fuck off and used some choice language, I've now been charged by dyfed powys to attend magestrates court on Nov 30th to answer for a public order offence section 4a (1) (5).
I recorded myself telling the IPCC goon to fuck off and have all of the cctv of my amputation and the secret recording of the commissioner.
I'm hoping I can beat this trumped up charge and I'm hoping this group can help.
Presumably refers to this story -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... opped.html

Obviously sounds horrific, and you can see why he's upset.

However, surely you have to be as dumb as a box of rocks to record yourself being abusive to a public employee, admit it on a public forum, and then try to say that the subsequent charges are 'trumped up'?
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4806
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by longdog »

Does this mean PAYG Robinson is finally admitting his shit doesn't work?
Alan Howes

David R - I've watched many videos on YouTube in which Police Officers and bailiffs have broken the law. WHY have none of them been taken to court!


David Robinson

Because there are no courts of law to take them to.
:snicker:
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

longdog wrote:Does this mean PAYG Robinson is finally admitting his shit doesn't work?
Alan Howes

David R - I've watched many videos on YouTube in which Police Officers and bailiffs have broken the law. WHY have none of them been taken to court!


David Robinson

Because there are no courts of law to take them to.
:snicker:

but fear not , a plan is at hand!
Dean Renshaw So let's seize a court and turn it into a common law court
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3759
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

John Uskglass wrote:Another bizarre case for the PLD crew.
I am a victim of Dyfed Powys police, they amputated 3 of my fingers in custody.
The ipcc conducted an INDEPENDENT investigation into my injury and cleared all officers involved.
I was invited to an interview with the crime commissioner for Wales 2 months ago and I secretly recorded it for evidence.
When the meeting ended I told an ipcc officer to fuck off and used some choice language, I've now been charged by dyfed powys to attend magestrates court on Nov 30th to answer for a public order offence section 4a (1) (5).
I recorded myself telling the IPCC goon to fuck off and have all of the cctv of my amputation and the secret recording of the commissioner.
I'm hoping I can beat this trumped up charge and I'm hoping this group can help.
Presumably refers to this story -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... opped.html

Obviously sounds horrific, and you can see why he's upset.
I'd think there is a case for an investigation there but he will do himself no favours making arguably illegal recordings and hoping PLD will help.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7559
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by The Observer »

Dean Renshaw So let's seize a court and turn it into a common law court
Strong contender for the "Here-Hold-My-Beer-While-I-Try-This" award.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

The Observer wrote:
Dean Renshaw So let's seize a court and turn it into a common law court
Strong contender for the "Here-Hold-My-Beer-While-I-Try-This" award.
Naturally - worked brilliantly for Roger Hayes and his BCG muppets.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????