Obviously I, as appointed supreme common law judge, would have to look at all of the applicable law, study and balance the evidence carefully and give very careful thought to the complex legal issues... And then I'd give judgement in your favourHercule Parrot wrote:A pointless claim. If it is successful, I will immediately appeal it to Longdog's supreme common law court.Robert White
7 February at 09:34
Is there anyone here that doesn't like the council tax system? If so the common law court will be doing something about it soon, if you would like to be a part of it just type YES in the comments. As soon as it's ready to go I'll message everyone interested with further details.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
COMMON LAW COURT, GREAT BRITAIN:
Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
It is never prudent to give away too much personal information, but I have some experience in these matters.longdog wrote:Finally a follow up to...STATEMENT OF CLAIM
<snip>
In addition to the above, the Respondents are failing to account properly and are failing to obtain the consent of the people for expenditure.
Council accounts are audited annually and presented at the annual budget setting meeting. It is illegal for a council to not set a balanced budget signed off by the section 151 officer. These meetings are matters of public record and open to all and the budget papers published. And whether you agree with your own council's priorities and political agenda they are enacted by people who quite literally have the consent of the people... elected councillors!
These people really are as thick as mince.
[Fixed spelink!]
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:48 pm
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
But what the FOTLers want isn’t a budget set by councillors. They want every single penny of expenditure explicitly approved by a referendum, and if they don’t like the result of the referendum they want to “decline joinder” and declare it doesn’t apply to them anyway.
So paying any kind of taxation at all becomes entirely voluntary, though they do still tend to want to benefit from much of what taxation pays for. Like roads to travel on in their personal, private, and definitely non-commercial conveyances.
And the same with all laws. Even their beloved common law (the real kind, not the one they’ve invented).
So paying any kind of taxation at all becomes entirely voluntary, though they do still tend to want to benefit from much of what taxation pays for. Like roads to travel on in their personal, private, and definitely non-commercial conveyances.
And the same with all laws. Even their beloved common law (the real kind, not the one they’ve invented).
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
You are so right, and have reminded me of how I found this site in the first place...The Seventh String wrote:But what the FOTLers want isn’t a budget set by councillors. They want every single penny of expenditure explicitly approved by a referendum, and if they don’t like the result of the referendum they want to “decline joinder” and declare it doesn’t apply to them anyway.
I was searching for details of the lovely Hannah (Hannah Sotbolt - An English Rose), who decided she wasn't going to pay her council tax because her council was "funding illegal wars". I think we were all as outraged as her when we discovered Gloucester County Council had granted planning permission for a conservatory on a two-up two-down in Kabul, but we all have to pay it.
The quality of FMOTLers has definitely dipped in recent months.
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
I'm inclined to agree. Even the relative newcomers over on PLD seem to have lost the little impetus they ever had of late. Even Creepy Charlie's jailing for contempt was somewhat of a disappointment... Where were the mass protests a la Ollie Pillock? Where was the outrage and the putting on noticeings?AnOwlCalledSage wrote:The quality of FMOTLers has definitely dipped in recent months.
Come on lads... Get your fingers out!
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8246
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
It's dipped for years here. I had a few good years but now all I have left is Dean Kory.The quality of FMOTLers has definitely dipped in recent months.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Do we reckon Whitebait actually believes this Common Law Court will achieve anything? And what about this bizarre comment ..
Keith Biggs
Hi robert ,just a quick question ,would they start chasing my wife to pay the council tax ? She isn’t in rebellion ,she’s scared to because she works for the local authority and is scared she could lose her job
Robert White
Hi Keith, if both you and your wife are registered with the council they will hold both jointly responsible. You can both register with the common law court using the above links with no worries. By doing that you don't have to withhold council tax you can carry on paying, it will be used to test the system.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 2:47 pm
- Location: Manchester by day, Slaithwaite by night
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
I miss Jimmy One-Cell.AnOwlCalledSage wrote:
The quality of FMOTLers has definitely dipped in recent months.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
I imagine Krabby's plan is to invite council tax payments to be redirected into some facade of a trust or escrow account, to be released to the relevant council when they have satisfied the so-called common law court of their compliance to a list of constitutional and financial stipulations.aesmith wrote:Do we reckon Whitebait actually believes this Common Law Court will achieve anything? And what about this bizarre comment ..Keith Biggs
Hi robert ,just a quick question ,would they start chasing my wife to pay the council tax ? She isn’t in rebellion ,she’s scared to because she works for the local authority and is scared she could lose her job
Robert White
Hi Keith, if both you and your wife are registered with the council they will hold both jointly responsible. You can both register with the common law court using the above links with no worries. By doing that you don't have to withhold council tax you can carry on paying, it will be used to test the system.
Obvious problem 1 is that this means wilful refusal to pay, despite having the means to do so. Obvious problem 2 is that the stipulations will be intentionally infeasible, and the third of course is that the funds will be stolen by one or more of the "honourable" rebels within a week.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Yeesh! It is a property tax. No one has to be "registered" with the council to be liable. All they have to do is be over 18 and live in the property regardless of whether owner or renting. If one person refuses to pay, the other can be hit for the full amount.aesmith wrote:And what about this bizarre comment ..Keith Biggs
Hi robert ,just a quick question ,would they start chasing my wife to pay the council tax ? She isn’t in rebellion ,she’s scared to because she works for the local authority and is scared she could lose her job
Robert White
Hi Keith, if both you and your wife are registered with the council they will hold both jointly responsible. You can both register with the common law court using the above links with no worries. By doing that you don't have to withhold council tax you can carry on paying, it will be used to test the system.
Councils have quite ranging powers to cross-reference databases (including the full electoral register) in order to establish liability. And yes, it would be proportional to use employee records.
Also misunderstood is that the whole amount becomes due the first week in April. Councils (by law) allow two alternative methods of deferred payment; 10 months and two off; or split into 12 monthly payments (they don't tend to advertise the latter and I know some prefer having the two "free" months). That is why when people fall into arrears on monthly payments, the council requests the full outstanding amount - so best not to do so at the start of the financial year!
It is also possible to get the single person discount if one of the adults is registered as having a severe mental impairment which I'm surprised Keith hasn't suggested.
The lack of self-awareness being demonstrated here is staggering. If no-one paid council tax, who would pay his wife?
[Edit: Removed an errant apostrophe.]
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Given that their obergruppenführer David "Begging Bowl" Robinson survives entirely on state benefits (and whatever he can scam out of his followers) whilst simultaneously claiming it's illegal for the tax-payers who pay for his benefits to pay the taxes that pay his benefits worrying about who pays council employees would seem a tad churlish.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: The lack of self-awareness being demonstrated here is staggering. If no-one paid council tax, who would pay his wife?
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
longdog wrote:Given that their obergruppenführer David "Begging Bowl" Robinson survives entirely on state benefits (and whatever he can scam out of his followers) whilst simultaneously claiming it's illegal for the tax-payers who pay for his benefits to pay the taxes that pay his benefits worrying about who pays council employees would seem a tad churlish.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: The lack of self-awareness being demonstrated here is staggering. If no-one paid council tax, who would pay his wife?
Ah, but to be fair to the great leader, he only accepts his benefits ‘under duress’.....naturally.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Without Dave, what kind of reality entertainment would we have?SteveUK wrote:longdog wrote:Given that their obergruppenführer David "Begging Bowl" Robinson survives entirely on state benefits (and whatever he can scam out of his followers) whilst simultaneously claiming it's illegal for the tax-payers who pay for his benefits to pay the taxes that pay his benefits worrying about who pays council employees would seem a tad churlish.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: The lack of self-awareness being demonstrated here is staggering. If no-one paid council tax, who would pay his wife?
Ah, but to be fair to the great leader, he only accepts his benefits ‘under duress’.....naturally.
I’d like to see a reality show dedicated to these rebels to be honest, like meet the Osbournes, but with less swearing and more calamitous failures.
Imagine the episode where they “sieged” the court?
90% filmed in the weatherspoons!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 9:29 pm
- Location: West Midlands, England
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
What a coincidence. I woke up this morning to the realisation that following the antics of the mentally differently abled was akin to watching the kind of TV 'reality' show that I affect to despise.
This was a somewhat bitter pill to swallow, to realise my own hypocricy.
This will not be the first time I have realised my motives were nowhere near as noble and disinterested as I imagined.
This was a somewhat bitter pill to swallow, to realise my own hypocricy.
This will not be the first time I have realised my motives were nowhere near as noble and disinterested as I imagined.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
In short, you’ve watched Jeremy Kyle this morning?Siegfried Shrink wrote:What a coincidence. I woke up this morning to the realisation that following the antics of the mentally differently abled was akin to watching the kind of TV 'reality' show that I affect to despise.
This was a somewhat bitter pill to swallow, to realise my own hypocricy.
This will not be the first time I have realised my motives were nowhere near as noble and disinterested as I imagined.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 9:29 pm
- Location: West Midlands, England
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Good heavens, no. Some things are just too dysfunctional.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
I like the idea; how about "Dreary Dave's Dismal Day", a fly-on-the-wall (un)reality show set in an east midlands sheltered housing accommodation block as our hero potters about, generally distraining and rebelling.JimUk1 wrote:Without Dave, what kind of reality entertainment would we have?SteveUK wrote:Ah, but to be fair to the great leader, he only accepts his benefits ‘under duress’.....naturally.longdog wrote:
Given that their obergruppenführer David "Begging Bowl" Robinson survives entirely on state benefits (and whatever he can scam out of his followers) whilst simultaneously claiming it's illegal for the tax-payers who pay for his benefits to pay the taxes that pay his benefits worrying about who pays council employees would seem a tad churlish.
I’d like to see a reality show dedicated to these rebels to be honest, like meet the Osbournes, but with less swearing and more calamitous failures.
Imagine the episode where they “sieged” the court?
90% filmed in the weatherspoons!
Or how about some other suitable programme titles with a distinctly PLD-theme;
No Cash in the Attic.
Come Fine with Me
Say Yes to the Distress
No Friends
The 1261 House
Common Law and Order
Pendragons Den
He's been hassled again by those nasty Rossendale bailiffs;
So, if anyone from Rossendales reading this happens to be a mate of Mr. Evans, a word to the wise.Good afternoon rebels....
Just had another sneaky visit by Rossendales demanding monies with menaces and trespassing.....he very quietly put another notice of enforcement through my letter box and scuttled away like the roach of a man that he is....Mr Evans of Rossendales was warned that he would be considered a trespasser and thug if he attended my property again....I have taken steps to make sure he is not allowed into the bulding in future.
I'm thinking of gathering a few rebels and then phoning him and inviting him round so I can arrest him and call the policy enforcers....I'm still in the process of putting the local imposter police on notice at the moment so might wait until i've completed that first.....don't want to make it too easy for these traitors to get away with aiding and abetting high treason, although they will do for now of course.
They wouldn't do it because;
no-one would heed the rallying cry and turn up in the first place.
If by some miracle there were to be enough rebels assembled;
they'd all get arrested, at the very least for false imprisonment and assault.
If Dreary thinks the local plod are all imposters and without authority what purpose would be served by detaining a bailiff and then expecting the very same imposter police to turn out and do his bidding.
He just doesn't think these things through sometimes. If at all.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
I like the idea; how about "Dreary Dave's Dismal Day", a fly-on-the-wall (un)reality show set in an east midlands sheltered housing accommodation block as our hero potters about, generally distraining and rebelling.JimUk1 wrote:Without Dave, what kind of reality entertainment would we have?SteveUK wrote:Ah, but to be fair to the great leader, he only accepts his benefits ‘under duress’.....naturally.longdog wrote:
Given that their obergruppenführer David "Begging Bowl" Robinson survives entirely on state benefits (and whatever he can scam out of his followers) whilst simultaneously claiming it's illegal for the tax-payers who pay for his benefits to pay the taxes that pay his benefits worrying about who pays council employees would seem a tad churlish.
I’d like to see a reality show dedicated to these rebels to be honest, like meet the Osbournes, but with less swearing and more calamitous failures.
Imagine the episode where they “sieged” the court?
90% filmed in the weatherspoons!
Or how about some other suitable programme titles with a distinctly PLD-theme;
No Cash in the Attic.
Come Fine with Me
Say Yes to the Distress
No Friends
The 1261 House
Common Law and Order
Pendragons Den
He's been hassled again by those nasty Rossendale bailiffs;
So, if anyone from Rossendales reading this happens to be a mate of Mr. Evans, a word to the wise.Good afternoon rebels....
Just had another sneaky visit by Rossendales demanding monies with menaces and trespassing.....he very quietly put another notice of enforcement through my letter box and scuttled away like the roach of a man that he is....Mr Evans of Rossendales was warned that he would be considered a trespasser and thug if he attended my property again....I have taken steps to make sure he is not allowed into the bulding in future.
I'm thinking of gathering a few rebels and then phoning him and inviting him round so I can arrest him and call the policy enforcers....I'm still in the process of putting the local imposter police on notice at the moment so might wait until i've completed that first.....don't want to make it too easy for these traitors to get away with aiding and abetting high treason, although they will do for now of course.
They wouldn't do it because;
no-one would heed the rallying cry and turn up in the first place.
If by some miracle there were to be enough rebels assembled;
they'd all get arrested, at the very least for false imprisonment and assault.
If Dreary thinks the local plod are all imposters and without authority what purpose would be served by detaining a bailiff and then expecting the very same imposter police to turn out and do his bidding.
He just doesn't think these things through sometimes. If at all.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 9:29 pm
- Location: West Midlands, England
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
I think a custodial sentence could reasonably be expected in the circumstances.I'm thinking of gathering a few rebels and then phoning him and inviting him round so I can arrest him and call the policy enforcers.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: Practical Lawful Dissent FMOTL antics, continued...
Another potential outcome he doesn't seem to have factored into the equation is the debt collector, taking advantage of his common law right to defend himself against kidnap, administering a damn good hiding and then pressing charges.exiledscouser wrote:If Dreary thinks the local plod are all imposters and without authority what purpose would be served by detaining a bailiff and then expecting the very same imposter police to turn out and do his bidding.
He just doesn't think these things through sometimes. If at all.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?