Posted today.......
To: Chief Inspector Kev Byrne
Daventry Police Station
Daventry
Northamptonshire
NN11 4AA
From: David Robinson
Daventry
Northamptonshire
NN11
Served by recorded post.
Date: 03-04-2018
NOTICE
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
Dear Chief Inspector Byrne,
I am writing to you in order to bring to put you on Notice of the various crimes being presently committed against me, which the police (as yet) will not investigate. The allegations that I make herein are criminal in nature, therefore the police have a duty to investigate the allegations and to act upon their findings if a criminal act has indeed been committed. I trust that you will agree with that statement.
I have been studying law for sometime now. I understand that Britain is a common law jurisdiction. For it to no longer be a common law jurisdiction Treason must have been committed. The Common law (as you will know) refers to the common laws and customs of the people. The un-repealed 1215 Magna Carta and 1688 Coronation Oath Act are permanent contracts between the monarch and the people which remain in perpetuity today. A breach of either would constitute the crime of Treason at common law.
Since I have obtained absolute evidence that High Treason has and is being committed by quislings in Westminster, I have dutifully rejected the demands of the state as it is illegal to aid and abet crime. I have used the common law within Notices and Affidavits to all concerned to make my legal position known and, to provide evidence of the High Treason being committed, which provides me (as it does us all) with 'lawful excuse' not to comply with a criminal administration. The common law forbids it. Personal integrity also.
I have had some major successes over the years, mainly in helping others achieve remedy in denying the so called courts authority to act upon the ultra vires orders that they have created. Including a 7 day Committal order to prison ordered by the alleged District Judge Bromilow of Yeovil County Court 2015/16. I mention this not to gloat but to inform you of the reasons why the state is blatantly oppressing me.
I have been making this stand with absolute lawful excuse to do so since January 2010, which any properly convened court de jure hearing would confirm as being entirely legal under present day circumstances.
Since the plot to overthrow British National Sovereignty has been ongoing for generations, we no longer have common law courts where the jurors act as the judges; whom decide the validity of government statutes; whom decide what evidence is admissible in court; whom also deliver a verdict and the sentence. The verdict must also be unanimous in such a hearing. In short, there is nowhere for we the people to obtain justice.
There is no peaceful remedy against institutionalised tyranny without properly convened courts of law. We the common people, whom the police have a duty to serve according to law, are being subjected to massive state corruption and illegal court hearings where true justice is denied, which is absolute tyranny. Police are today being 'used' by a corporate front that has emerged over the last few decades, which has been used to destroy and take over all of our public services, including the police service.
Since I moved to Daventry approximately 18 months ago, I had no choice but to sign on (under duress) for entitlements to the welfare state to survive. I have been subjected to evidenced fraud and blatant ignorance with regard to the law by Atos and CAPITA (both Corporate entities) aided and abetted by the corrupt, anonymous, unaccountable agents of the Universal Credit scam. It is to my understanding that it is illegal for private corporate entities to be involved in ANY public services. It is a contradiction in terms to believe otherwise.
I was diagnosed with muscular dystrophy in 1988 and became unable to work a few years later. I was in receipt of disability benefits including the low rate of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) from the early 1990's. DLA was granted to me for life because of the nature of the degenerative condition that I endure. I have a letter from the DWP which confirms that claim. I also had no further requirement to supply medical certificates as there is no cure to my condition, therefore my condition cannot improve.
After attending an assessment by an Atos agent in Northampton in February 2017, whom lied within the report that she provided. Various agents of the DWP have used this fraudulent assessment to deny me disability entitlements. The lie within the false report is self evident as I cannot possibly do what the agent claimed she witnessed me doing, i.e., that I had demonstrated how I could wash my hair with both hands which is impossible..... DLA was also denied me some years ago for no reason. The only excuse that has been offered more recently is that DLA was scrapped whilst being replaced by a new benefit called Personal Independence payment (PIP), of which they claim I have no entitlement to. I have put managers of the DWP and Universal Credit on Notice of the facts, yet I am merely ignored as the theft and fraud continues.
I have also been subject to entitlements being deducted by fraudulent means from my account. Universal Credit and Daventry District Council agents are removing monies without justification for doing so, contrary to the evidenced facts that I have provided. I have also been standing against Daventry District Council's demands for full Council Tax of around £100.00 PCM. Last month I received £190.00 in entitlements. I could not afford to pay Council Tax even if it were legal to pay, obviously they are aware of that fact.
I have put all concerned on Notice of the facts in law with regard to Council Tax. Rossendales agents are in the process of enforcing an unauthorised Liability Order issued by Northampton Magistrates Court, which is NOT a court of law but a private corporate business, which can be evidenced by looking on the internet at 'Companies House' website. Northampton Magistrates Court's business number is 3844295. The Order is thus unauthorised and consequently illegal.
Rossendales agents still they threaten to remove my possessions (not that I have much) if I don't pay the extortionate demands. I will seek the protection of the common law and Daventry police if and when that is required. I am reporting acts of harassment, demands for monies with menaces and trespass herein. I would like to ascertain the future intentions of West Midlands police constables should I seek protection against Rossendales enforcement agents with regard to this matter. If my understanding of the law and claims against the present administration are in any way false then I seek clarity in substance, so that I do not act in breach of the common law.
The High Treason that I refer to is well evidenced and current. BREXIT and PESCO are blatant acts of High Treason by the May administration for example, but that is merely the tip of the iceberg.
All of the EU treaties sought to usurp the common law and deny the British people sovereignty. According to our Constitution (Magna Carta 1215 and the Coronation Oath Act 1688) the crown has the sole duty to deny unconstitutional Bills from being granted royal assent. That has NOT been occurring for many generations now. The 1911 Parliament Act was an act of High Treason by the Asquith administration as it destroyed the royal assent procedure contrary to the Coronation Oath Act 1688.
For the people of Britain to be truly sovereign, and to enjoy a fair, just system of service whilst being “policed by consent” (which is admitted that we are 'policed by consent' on the Police Federation website - first page), the duties of the jurors in ALL trials must be upheld in accordance with Magna Carta 1215, i.e., Articles 39,40 etc; jurors must be able to determine the legality of government statutes for the term “policed by consent” to be true. These duties have been denied the people for decades within the current de facto Admiralty courts, which is why we now live under such a despotic and entirely criminal regime. 90+% of present statutes would not pass as anything but illegal by a jury convened under the common law today.
Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta (which has NOT been repealed despite government propaganda) was also invoked on the 23rd March 2001. Despite the Barons' Committee being impotent and its invocation being somewhat flawed because they also used the Treasonous 1689 Bill of Rights within their petition, which usurps the duties of a constitutional monarch and jurors, the petition that they served on the 7th February 2001 provides further evidence of Treason with regard to the treaty of Nice. In brief, said treaty contravenes the rule of law and Elizabeth II had the duty under the Coronation Oath Act to instruct her parliament not to ratify it. The Bill of Rights treasonously overrules the royal assent creating Parliamentary Sovereignty which is a contradiction in terms, common sense needs to be employed because obviously something that is supposed to serve the sovereign people, cannot claim to be sovereign over them. This provides further grounds for the people to reject the current illegal administration. The invocation of said Article was also published by the MSM Ref; Daily Telegraph 24th March 2001 “Peers Petition Queen on Europe” by Caroline Davis. I have included copies of the transcripts of the petition and letters between the parties herein (Exhibit A).
Moreover, compelling evidence of Sedition and High Treason by the Heath Administration by signing Britain up to the European Economic Communities Act on the 1st January 1973, can be seen within a file collected from the Public Records Office by a David Barnby, entitled “Shoehorned Into The EU” FCO 30/1048. The files are readily available online. I have not included a copy herein.
I also have said evidence in my possession along with extensive case file(s) which I claim must be viewed as a matter of urgency within a recorded police interview without delay. I demand this for my own defence and in defence of the truth under common law.
I have been very active over the past eight years by successfully taking on the corrupt courts and other various institutions of the present regime, often in defence of others but also in defence of myself to remain within the common law, as I am again now doing against the illegal collection of Council Tax. This is why I claim the state is suppressing me in the manner that it is. I can prove to anyone whom observes the truth in law that there is no criminal intent (mens rea) within any my actions to date, quite the opposite in fact. Under common law if there is no 'mens rea' (criminal intent) then there is no crime.
Whilst serving British police constables remain unaware or ignorant as to the truth in law, because the common law was removed from universities in the 1970's in order to destroy it. And whilst serving police constables unquestioningly suppress the people for defending their right not to aid and abet crime in protection of our inalienable rights under common law, the treason will continue and the state will grow ever more tyrannical as a result. I have met many good police men and women over the years whom are stuck between a rock and a hard place, quietly they are sick and tired of the regime also, but they all knew very well the consequences for rocking the boat. John Wedger, an ex Met Police Constable being a recent good example of how the state suppresses whistle blowers.
For the sake of the future and your own families and friends liberty, I urge you to take this matter very seriously indeed. The quisling government evidently intends to embroil the British military under the command of the EU (PESCO) regardless of the people voting to leave the EU. A Nation unable to defend itself independently from all enemies foreign and domestic cannot be a sovereign Nation. How bad has it got to get before serving police constables recognise the threat to their own lives and liberty, and that of their loved ones and those they are entrusted to serve?
Any police constable(s) brave enough to make a stand against the quislings in Westminster et al (including their own high ranking officers) would be very well supported by the people, whom are waking up en masse to the longevity and complexities of the deception/Treason, and as to the remedy which is to unite under common law.
We the people are in the process of convening common law courts which cannot be denied to be anything but legitimate without publicly declaring the constitution invalid, which would be sedition to claim. I myself have a certified copy of registration of my Birth under common law via such a court. I have also (under duress) claimed full ownership of the legal fiction (MR DAVID PAUL ROBINSON).
The current corporate regime ONLY acts fraudulently and deceptively against the legal fiction, and has admitted in recent (alleged) 'court' hearings that the 'court' has no jurisdiction over the man. This is on public record within the Common Law Court case files:
https://www.commonlawcourt.com/
I have claimed ownership of the legal fiction under duress of circumstances because it is not a lawful/legal entity. For something to be 'legal' it must also be 'lawful' i.e., comply with the common law constitution. I have also already officially rejected any presumed affiliations that may exist between myself and the legal fiction, by declaring my standing under common law. I also served two (2) affidavits on Buckingham Palace in 2010 removing any presumed allegiance to the crown until the treason committed by the ratification of the treaty of Nice has been redressed.
A growing number of the members of our group on Facebook ('Practical Lawful Dissent') are using various pieces of Treason evidence in their rebuttal processes. Many public servants et al have consequently been put on Notice of the facts. Those put on Notice of the evidential facts cannot later deny within a court of law that they are unaware of the facts/crime(s) that they are aiding and abetting/committing. Misprision of Treason is also a very serious offence under sec: 1 of the illegally repealed 1795 Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act. Ignorance is no defence in law. Those whom act criminally regardless of the facts that have been presented to them within proper legal Notices, are therefore guilty of High Treason themselves.
There are various movements now joining together in unity to demand the return of the rule, and due process of law within the judiciary etc. We in the Practical Lawful Dissent movement seek to help remedy the fact that due process of law in unavailable by involving British police, whilst we remain in full support of the new Chartist movement and the Winchester Declaration and Restoration Amendment. We demand the involvement of police so that a possible future confrontation between the police and the people can be avoided.
We can bring back the common law by peaceful means if only the police will observe the evidential facts and act upon them without fear nor favour. I cannot stress enough the urgency of this matter. Whilst we allow very dangerous criminals to run our country into the ground, with their grubby fingers on the buttons, the threat to our lives and liberties will only increase as more and more people wake up and unite to make a stand against them. We live in exceptional times.
The people will not allow the treason to continue for much longer. We have no choice but to defend the common law for the sake of our health and liberty, also our children and for future generations. The united Nations Agenda 21, 20-30 is evidence enough of the future intentions of the global dictatorship that is blatantly emerging..
How British police can serve such an evidently corrupt regime without objection defies logic and reason. Secret (family) courts (which are entirely unconstitutional) have stolen as many as 70,000 children from unwitting, innocent parents whilst government quislings lose the files on paedophile rings that implicate some their own members!
There are many other very serious crimes being committed and evidently so. If serving police constables, whom have become corporate policy enforcers will not stand in defence of our children and due process of law, then we the people will have no choice but to take action ourselves. All serving police constables have a duty under their Oaths of office and warrant cards to act independently of all others in accordance with the law. The law that is referred to within the police Oath of office is the common law not unconstitutional Acts and Statutes. Officers of the crown are employed on the grounds that they “know the law and observe it well”.
Summary.
Please do not ignore this Notice I require assistance against crime.
1). I require written assurance from you C.I. Kev Byrne that West Midlands police constables will only act according to to the common law constitution when dealing with I, David Robinson. That MR DAVID ROBINSON (legal fiction) is a fraudulently created entity that has been revoked, made null and void, claimed and/or rejected, and thus does not apply to David Robinson the man living at the above address at the heading of this Notice.
2). I require an interview where my herein allegations are recorded and the evidence of which are thoroughly investigated. I intend to gain a crime number once the evidence has been properly examined by police and verified to be the truth. I intend to take the matter(s) further under common law to achieve remedy and seek justice.
I require a reply to this Notice in order to pre-empt any possible breach of the peace and further breaches of the law. I trust that I have supplied enough information and directions to the Treason evidence for you to be able exercise due diligence on the matter. Please reply within 7 days from receipt of this Notice or it shall be taken to mean by all interested parties that by tacit agreement ALL of the claims I make herein are agreed upon by you in full and, that all constables from West Midlands Police who attend the address at the top of this Notice will only act according to our common law constitution.
If enforcement of unconstitutional statutes/Orders are aided and abetted by West Midlands Police despite this Notice (and others previously served), then you sir may also be held personally liable within a properly convened court de jure hearing in future. I seek however to avoid such circumstances from occurring of course. With good reason I have no confidence in British Policing at this time. I therefore require clear confirmation of intent.
The common law determines that I have the right to self defence against those whom seek to cause me (or any other) loss or harm by illegal means. I take the threats I have received from Rossendales enforcement agent 'Mr Walker' (and others) extremely seriously. I shall defend my common law rights by force if necessary and, I shall seek remedy via due process of law against ANY individual(s), who by their acts or omissions breach the common law.
Written under duress without vexation, frivolity or intent to deceive. All of the above is written as an attempt to remedy the criminal allegations herein provided in a thoroughly peaceful and legal manner. I hereby declare on penalty of perjury that all of the claims made herein are the truth as to my understanding. With all my inalienable common law rights reserved.
Any reply MUST be made on the respondents full commercial liability and on penalty of perjury, whilst also providing a clearly legible printed name of the respondent.
Sincerely David Robinson.